SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Before deadline

Créé par: michaelpratt21
Équipe: 2022-23 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 24 janv. 2023
Publié: 25 janv. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
2.
VAN
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (VGK)
3.
VAN
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (TBL)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de NYR
Logo de TBL
Logo de VGK
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2025
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2582 500 000 $81 402 500 $1 250 000 $2 850 000 $1 097 500 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 260 000 $7 260 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 450 000 $2 450 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
25 janv. 2023 à 19 h 5
#1
Bog
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 913
Mentions "j'aime": 334
Horrible for the Canucks. Minnesota doesn’t make sense as a Horvat landing spot imo. Klimovich looks like an absolute stud right now and Horvat is worth more than that
Lightman13 a aimé ceci.
25 janv. 2023 à 19 h 17
#2
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2020
Messages: 2,766
Mentions "j'aime": 520
Never stops with these Canucks fans! Not in a million times Minnesota does thus! We aren't interested in bo Horvat, my gosh now you guys can stop trolling and being like Montreal fans
25 janv. 2023 à 19 h 21
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 5,306
Mentions "j'aime": 3,373
Guys, seriously, Minnesota isn't trading their top assets for your rentals. If you want pieces like Rossi, Lambos, Khusnutdinov, a 1st round pick, etc, offer something we can actually use long term.

Disclaimer though: you guys don't have anything that would work for us for that price.
Lightman13 a aimé ceci.
25 janv. 2023 à 19 h 29
#4
Patient gm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,849
Mentions "j'aime": 984
Quoting: Caerii
Guys, seriously, Minnesota isn't trading their top assets for your rentals. If you want pieces like Rossi, Lambos, Khusnutdinov, a 1st round pick, etc, offer something we can actually use long term.

Disclaimer though: you guys don't have anything that would work for us for that price.


Petterson would be about it
25 janv. 2023 à 19 h 31
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 5,306
Mentions "j'aime": 3,373
Quoting: Lightman13
Petterson would be about it


Even then, we can't afford him next year without drastic wholesale changes, and we definitely can't afford his extension the year after.
Lightman13 a aimé ceci.
25 janv. 2023 à 19 h 39
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 2,631
Mentions "j'aime": 954
TB must be dollar for dollar according to JBB in his nid season state of the lightning media deal.
25 janv. 2023 à 20 h 10
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 4,389
Mentions "j'aime": 3,118
Quoting: bogdown
Horrible for the Canucks. Minnesota doesn’t make sense as a Horvat landing spot imo. Klimovich looks like an absolute stud right now and Horvat is worth more than that


Horvat is worth nowhere near that.

A career 60 point 2nd line center having a career year in his age 28 season is not worth half of what Canuncks fans think he is. They pulled the same crap with JT Miller last season saying he should get an Eichel level return and how did that work out for them again?

But more importantly, Minnesota isn't...

A) Moving Foligno in a Horvat trade.

B) Moving Middleton in a Horvat trade.

C) Moving its #1 Prospect in Rossi for a pure rental in a Horvat trade.

Also, saying Klimovich is a stud is a bit much, he's having a really good season down in the AHL with Abbotsford. But I wouldn’t call him a stud.

Klimovich: 9 goals, 11 assists, 20 points in 36 games played in the AHL this year.

Rossi: 8 goals, 14 assists, 22 points in 21 games played in the AHL this year.

In short, Rossi has played 15 less games in the AHL than Klimovich due to starting out in the NHL this year and has 1 less goal, 3 more assists, and 2 more points. Despite having played roughly half as many games.

Tell me again which one qualifies as a stud?
25 janv. 2023 à 21 h 29
#8
Patient gm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,849
Mentions "j'aime": 984
Quoting: Caerii
Even then, we can't afford him next year without drastic wholesale changes, and we definitely can't afford his extension the year after.


I wasn’t saying the wild could afford him, just that he’s about the only player in Vancouver worth that return.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage