SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

One Move

Équipe: 2022-23 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 24 janv. 2023
Publié: 24 janv. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
NSH
  1. Bryson, Jacob
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (BUF)
Détails additionnels:
Top 10 protected
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de PHI
Logo de VGK
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
2024
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
2025
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $65 576 667 $0 $3 620 000 $16 923 333 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
855 833 $855 833 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance412 500 $$412K)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
837 500 $837 500 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
687 500 $687 500 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 916 667 $4 916 667 $
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
825 000 $825 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
24 janv. 2023 à 7 h 19
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 5,715
Mentions "j'aime": 4,783
Like it
24 janv. 2023 à 7 h 34
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 1,228
Mentions "j'aime": 657
This is exactly what I see Adams doing...making one move for a LD whether it's someone as costly as Ekholm or someone more in line with the Sabres timeline but I wouldn't be opposed to this trade.
24 janv. 2023 à 7 h 37
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 2,267
Mentions "j'aime": 1,561
I bet Nashville would get more for Ekky. 2023 1st, good prospect, mid round pick or something to make cap work is what I try and stick to
Ennis a aimé ceci.
24 janv. 2023 à 8 h 5
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 4,862
Mentions "j'aime": 3,238
Gonna have to keep adding if you want Ekholm.
Ennis a aimé ceci.
24 janv. 2023 à 8 h 29
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,731
Mentions "j'aime": 14,493
Quoting: Just_A_Guess
Gonna have to keep adding if you want Ekholm.


No, I don't think so
24 janv. 2023 à 8 h 29
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,731
Mentions "j'aime": 14,493
Quoting: OkMan
I bet Nashville would get more for Ekky. 2023 1st, good prospect, mid round pick or something to make cap work is what I try and stick to


I doubt that. He's 32 and makes top pairing money for 3 more years!
24 janv. 2023 à 8 h 33
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 4,862
Mentions "j'aime": 3,238
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
No, I don't think so


You would be incorrect. Your offer does nothing for NSH. Bryson is useless and the 1st is for next year, non bueno. Swap Bryson for Olofsson and Jokiharju and you have a deal.
24 janv. 2023 à 8 h 38
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,731
Mentions "j'aime": 14,493
Quoting: Just_A_Guess
You would be incorrect. Your offer does nothing for NSH. Bryson is useless and the 1st is for next year, non bueno. Swap Bryson for Olofsson and Jokiharju and you have a deal.


I mean, no
GenW a aimé ceci.
24 janv. 2023 à 8 h 41
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 4,862
Mentions "j'aime": 3,238
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
I mean, no


Ok, shop elsewhere then. We're not giving our players away for pennies on the dollar.
24 janv. 2023 à 9 h 3
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,731
Mentions "j'aime": 14,493
Quoting: Just_A_Guess
Ok, shop elsewhere then. We're not giving our players away for pennies on the dollar.


I don't agree that this is what you are doing, but ok
24 janv. 2023 à 9 h 11
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 5,332
Mentions "j'aime": 3,405
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
I don't agree that this is what you are doing, but ok


You're trading for Ekholm and you didn't even give us THIS YEARS first. Stop it.
Not to mention the pick is top 10 protected? For next year?

We don't want a 25 year old bottom 4 defenseman, either.

If you want a locked under contract, 6'4, primarily shutdown defenseman who can play 21+ minutes a night and score 30-40 pts a season...
It's gonna cost you a 1st+, and not just some scraps.
24 janv. 2023 à 9 h 35
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,731
Mentions "j'aime": 14,493
Quoting: EvanderKanesLawyer
You're trading for Ekholm and you didn't even give us THIS YEARS first. Stop it.
Not to mention the pick is top 10 protected? For next year?

We don't want a 25 year old bottom 4 defenseman, either.

If you want a locked under contract, 6'4, primarily shutdown defenseman who can play 21+ minutes a night and score 30-40 pts a season...
It's gonna cost you a 1st+, and not just some scraps.


I mean, I gave you a 1st+
24 janv. 2023 à 9 h 44
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 5,332
Mentions "j'aime": 3,405
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
I mean, I gave you a 1st+


You gave us Bryson, which we would have no use for, and a next years top 10 protected first.

Not even close.
24 janv. 2023 à 9 h 49
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,731
Mentions "j'aime": 14,493
Quoting: EvanderKanesLawyer
You gave us Bryson, which we would have no use for, and a next years top 10 protected first.

Not even close.


I gave you a first and more, which you literally just said was the cost.
GenW a aimé ceci.
24 janv. 2023 à 10 h 3
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 3,752
Mentions "j'aime": 967
I like this. Shore up the D with a solid, if unspectacular, veteran. Let the youngster F spread their wings.
24 janv. 2023 à 10 h 4
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 5,332
Mentions "j'aime": 3,405
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
I gave you a first and more, which you literally just said was the cost.


You're being dense on purpose.
You have us quantity>quality.

The first would have to be in this years draft and the + would have to be a middle ground prospect. Which you gave neither of.
24 janv. 2023 à 10 h 28
#17
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,731
Mentions "j'aime": 14,493
Quoting: EvanderKanesLawyer
You're being dense on purpose.
You have us quantity>quality.

The first would have to be in this years draft and the + would have to be a middle ground prospect. Which you gave neither of.


You didn't say that. You said 1st+. Sorry for not being a mind reader
24 janv. 2023 à 15 h 2
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 4,862
Mentions "j'aime": 3,238
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
I don't agree that this is what you are doing, but ok


You might want to do some research then, you're way off the mark and to think otherwise is a mistake.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage