SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Living in a Fantasy World

Créé par: BrokenDuck
Équipe: 2022-23 Islanders de New York
Date de création initiale: 23 janv. 2023
Publié: 23 janv. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Please don't completly shred me
Transactions
NYI
  1. Iafallo, Alex
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (LAK)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (PIT)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (LAK)
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de NYI
Logo de LAK
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
Logo de PIT
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
2024
Logo de NYI
Logo de LAK
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
2025
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
Logo de NYI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $82 619 963 $245 796 $1 402 500 $-119 963 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Islanders de New York
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Islanders de New York
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Islanders de New York
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Islanders de New York
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Islanders de New York
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Islanders de New York
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Islanders de New York
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Islanders de New York
4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Islanders de New York
750 000 $750 000 $ (Bonis de performance750 000 $$750K)
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Islanders de New York
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Islanders de New York
863 333 $863 333 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Islanders de New York
836 667 $836 667 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Islanders de New York
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Islanders de New York
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Islanders de New York
6 150 000 $6 150 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Islanders de New York
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Islanders de New York
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Islanders de New York
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Islanders de New York
825 000 $825 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Islanders de New York
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Islanders de New York
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Islanders de New York
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Islanders de New York
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 7
Logo de Islanders de New York
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Islanders de New York
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Islanders de New York
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance537 500 $$538K)
AD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 janv. 2023 à 15 h 55
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 6,348
Mentions "j'aime": 4,427
Yes, yes you are. Kings don't touch that with a 10, no 50-foot pole.
23 janv. 2023 à 15 h 56
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 3,623
Mentions "j'aime": 2,253
not really that interested in that, i'd prefer one of the prospects the kings already have to iafallo and two likely late first round picks, if they're trading sorokin it's going to be a full rebuild
23 janv. 2023 à 16 h 1
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 2,316
Mentions "j'aime": 2,214
Don't ask to not be shredded and then post something this obviously unrealistic/bad lol.
23 janv. 2023 à 16 h 3
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,449
Mentions "j'aime": 6,101
I wouldn't trade Iafallo for Sorokin 1-for-1. Iafallo is one of the most underrated players in the NHL.
23 janv. 2023 à 16 h 8
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 3,455
Mentions "j'aime": 1,624
Sorokin is not being moved.

Profile is also brand new with their 1st post so clearly a troll.
23 janv. 2023 à 16 h 20
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 847
Mentions "j'aime": 377
Hasek in his prime got traded for a middle six forward and a prospect. Roy in his prime got traded for a couple of prospects. You think any goaltender in the league is going to fitch a first let alone two of them? Besides Vassy and MAYBE Ullmark theres not a chance youd get this kind of return for Sorokin
23 janv. 2023 à 16 h 26
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 14,999
Mentions "j'aime": 12,084
Quoting: tkecanuck341
I wouldn't trade Iafallo for Sorokin 1-for-1. Iafallo is one of the most underrated players in the NHL.


smart move not trading a low end 2nd liner for the best goaltender in the league
23 janv. 2023 à 16 h 29
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 14,999
Mentions "j'aime": 12,084
Quoting: Warrior24
Sorokin is not being moved.

Profile is also brand new with their 1st post so clearly a troll.


at some point sorokin will have to get traded, can't let him walk for nothing.
23 janv. 2023 à 16 h 30
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,449
Mentions "j'aime": 6,101
Quoting: Db1899
smart move not trading a low end 2nd liner for the best goaltender in the league


He might be the best goaltender while playing for the Islanders, but goaltenders are way too dependent on the team playing in front of them. The Kings traded defense for offense this season, and their goaltenders' performance has suffered as a result. I don't think Sorokin would be the "best goaltender in the league" on the Kings.
23 janv. 2023 à 16 h 31
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 14,999
Mentions "j'aime": 12,084
Quoting: tkecanuck341
He might be the best goaltender while playing for the Islanders, but goaltenders are way too dependent on the team playing in front of them. The Kings traded defense for offense this season, and their goaltenders' performance has suffered as a result. I don't think Sorokin would be the "best goaltender in the league" on the Kings.


the isles are one of the worst defensive teams in the NHL, he'd be the best G on any team
23 janv. 2023 à 16 h 44
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,449
Mentions "j'aime": 6,101
Quoting: Db1899
the isles are one of the worst defensive teams in the NHL, he'd be the best G on any team


Don't agree.
23 janv. 2023 à 16 h 50
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 14,999
Mentions "j'aime": 12,084
Quoting: tkecanuck341
Don't agree.


You can disagree, but this it’s a fact that the isles suck defensively so you’re argument that goaltenders are dependent on their teams is not true
23 janv. 2023 à 17 h 3
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,449
Mentions "j'aime": 6,101
Quoting: Db1899
You can disagree, but this it’s a fact that the isles suck defensively so you’re argument that goaltenders are dependent on their teams is not true


The Kings defense was worse than the Islanders' over the first two months of the season. They were the worst in the league in goals against per game until around December 1st. Their defense was non-existent and much (not all) of the reason why Petersen got chased to the AHL. They have been doing better over the past 6 weeks or so except a few hiccups, and their goaltender performance (by both Quick and Copley) has improved dramatically as a result.

I don't think Sorokin would have done any better for the Kings during that time.
23 janv. 2023 à 17 h 7
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 14,999
Mentions "j'aime": 12,084
Quoting: tkecanuck341
The Kings defense was worse than the Islanders' over the first two months of the season. They were the worst in the league in goals against per game until around December 1st. Their defense was non-existent and much (not all) of the reason why Petersen got chased to the AHL. They have been doing better over the past 6 weeks or so except a few hiccups, and their goaltender performance (by both Quick and Copley) has improved dramatically as a result.

I don't think Sorokin would have done any better for the Kings during that time.


That’s not true. The isles were bottom 3 in the league over the first two months , only Anaheim and Chicago were worse.

LA gave up a lot of goals because Peterson sucked , not because the defense was bad.
23 janv. 2023 à 17 h 23
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,449
Mentions "j'aime": 6,101
Quoting: Db1899
That’s not true. The isles were bottom 3 in the league over the first two months , only Anaheim and Chicago were worse.

LA gave up a lot of goals because Peterson sucked , not because the defense was bad.


You might be thinking about goal differential when it comes to NYI, Anaheim, and Chicago, but LA had the single worst GA/GP in the league around American Thanksgiving. However, they were also tops of the league in Goals For, so it didn't look so bad.

You clearly didn't watch the Kings play earlier this season. Quick and Petersen both had a couple of stinker outings, but there's only so much you can do when the breakaway and odd-man rush chances per game are in the double digits (not exaggerating). Even Pheonix Copley wasn't immune, allowing in 6 goals in about 10 minutes against Buffalo due to non-existent defense by the Kings.

After the Buffalo game, McLellan gave an interview where he said the Kings "pushed the reset button" and were going back to coaching fundamentals. Things have improved dramatically since then.
23 janv. 2023 à 17 h 45
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 14,999
Mentions "j'aime": 12,084
Quoting: tkecanuck341
You might be thinking about goal differential when it comes to NYI, Anaheim, and Chicago, but LA had the single worst GA/GP in the league around American Thanksgiving. However, they were also tops of the league in Goals For, so it didn't look so bad.

You clearly didn't watch the Kings play earlier this season. Quick and Petersen both had a couple of stinker outings, but there's only so much you can do when the breakaway and odd-man rush chances per game are in the double digits (not exaggerating). Even Pheonix Copley wasn't immune, allowing in 6 goals in about 10 minutes against Buffalo due to non-existent defense by the Kings.

After the Buffalo game, McLellan gave an interview where he said the Kings "pushed the reset button" and were going back to coaching fundamentals. Things have improved dramatically since then.


Defense was never the problem with LA, it was goaltending

LA ranks 5th in the league, isles 23


23 janv. 2023 à 17 h 48
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 14,999
Mentions "j'aime": 12,084
Quoting: tkecanuck341
You might be thinking about goal differential when it comes to NYI, Anaheim, and Chicago, but LA had the single worst GA/GP in the league around American Thanksgiving. However, they were also tops of the league in Goals For, so it didn't look so bad.

You clearly didn't watch the Kings play earlier this season. Quick and Petersen both had a couple of stinker outings, but there's only so much you can do when the breakaway and odd-man rush chances per game are in the double digits (not exaggerating). Even Pheonix Copley wasn't immune, allowing in 6 goals in about 10 minutes against Buffalo due to non-existent defense by the Kings.

After the Buffalo game, McLellan gave an interview where he said the Kings "pushed the reset button" and were going back to coaching fundamentals. Things have improved dramatically since then.


LA was never bad defensively



23 janv. 2023 à 18 h 17
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,449
Mentions "j'aime": 6,101
Quoting: Db1899
LA was never bad defensively





xGA is based upon "danger" chances which is entirely based on where on the ice shots come from. It has nothing to do with whether they're odd-man rushes or if there's traffic in front of the net, or missed coverages that leave attacking players unmolested to get the chances they want. It also doesn't account for how many times the Kings went shorthanded due to blown defensive coverages resulting in penalties, and the fact that their PK was hitting around 60% until mid-December.

Tell Kings fans that the Kings were never bad defensively this season. The Kings were horrendous defensively for the first two months of the season. They had more turnovers and defensive breakdowns over the first 8 weeks of the season than they did at the depth of the rebuild when they finished 30th in the NHL in the standings.
23 janv. 2023 à 18 h 41
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 14,999
Mentions "j'aime": 12,084
Quoting: tkecanuck341
xGA is based upon "danger" chances which is entirely based on where on the ice shots come from. It has nothing to do with whether they're odd-man rushes or if there's traffic in front of the net, or missed coverages that leave attacking players unmolested to get the chances they want. It also doesn't account for how many times the Kings went shorthanded due to blown defensive coverages resulting in penalties, and the fact that their PK was hitting around 60% until mid-December.

Tell Kings fans that the Kings were never bad defensively this season. The Kings were horrendous defensively for the first two months of the season. They had more turnovers and defensive breakdowns over the first 8 weeks of the season than they did at the depth of the rebuild when they finished 30th in the NHL in the standings.


correct, it's still a much better indicator of a teams overall defensive impact than the eye test. LA is very good at preventing quality shots against, they can't be bad defensively if they are executing the most important part of defense
23 janv. 2023 à 18 h 58
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 14,449
Mentions "j'aime": 6,101
Quoting: Db1899
correct, it's still a much better indicator of a teams overall defensive impact than the eye test. LA is very good at preventing quality shots against, they can't be bad defensively if they are executing the most important part of defense


They have very clearly demonstrated that they can. For a period, every single game had at least 3-4 unstoppable shots against where the goalie had no chance. The fact that the Kings were good at suppressing shot quantity while still allowing that many guaranteed goals against is part of the reason why their goaltenders' SV% looks so bad.

Your chart also only shows 5v5 opportunities, while the Kings took a lot of penalties due to blown defensive coverages, and had among the league's worst PKs due to lack of appropriate personnel. If Sean Durzi is on your PK, you have problems.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage