SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

deals

Créé par: AK50
Équipe: 2022-23 Kraken de Seattle
Date de création initiale: 19 janv. 2023
Publié: 19 janv. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
2.
VAN
  1. Borgen, William
  2. Lind, Kole
  3. Wennberg, Alexander
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (SEA)
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
3.
SEA
  1. Klingberg, John (2 800 000 $ retained)
ANA
  1. Donskoi, Joonas
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (SEA)
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (SEA)
4.
SJS
  1. Jones, Martin
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (SEA)
  3. Choix de 6e ronde en 2023 (WSH)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de WPG
Logo de COL
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
2024
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de TOR
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de CGY
2025
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
Logo de SEA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2282 500 000 $76 339 166 $0 $925 000 $6 160 834 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 166 666 $5 166 666 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
897 500 $897 500 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 5
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
700 000 $700 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 900 000 $5 900 000 $
G
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
19 janv. 2023 à 11 h 29
#1
go Sharks go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 862
Mentions "j'aime": 396
Jones is no use to us and Reimer is worth more than a 4th and a 6th
19 janv. 2023 à 11 h 43
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 768
Mentions "j'aime": 480
As a Seattle fan, I'm don't think any of these trades as presently constructed make sense for the Kraken. Going in order:

1. I'd much rather have Bjorkstrand than Coleman. Bjorky is having a down season by his standards, but is still younger and more productive than Coleman, and does a lot of little things to help the team win that don't show up on the scoresheet.

2. The value for this one is OK for Seattle, though I think they'd prefer to keep Borgen if possible, as he's evolved into quite the underrated defenseman. Horvat would also be a good fit for what they need at this juncture. However, they're not really at the stage of their competitive window where giving up major assets for a rental. I think Horvat would be a prime offseason target for them in free agency, just not a trade target.

3. Seattle doesn't need a player with Klingberg's profile, and Anaheim would want more anyway.

4. Seattle shouldn't trade away Jones when he's been their best goalie, and the Sharks don't really need him. However, I could see the Kraken going after Reimer as a goalie target. If you remove Jones and bump up the 4th round pick to a 3rd, I think it makes much more sense for both sides and might actually be a deal that gets done.
AK50 a aimé ceci.
19 janv. 2023 à 11 h 48
#3
LosPatos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 3,324
Mentions "j'aime": 1,832
Counteroffer for Klingberg:

Donskoi
Nyman
2023 2nd Round (SEA)

for

Klingberg (50% retained)
AK50 a aimé ceci.
19 janv. 2023 à 11 h 53
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2017
Messages: 1,363
Mentions "j'aime": 1,433
The Canucks will want Firkus in any trade for Horvat
AK50 a aimé ceci.
19 janv. 2023 à 12 h 2
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,252
Mentions "j'aime": 19,514
Quoting: KrakenTheCode
1. I'd much rather have Bjorkstrand than Coleman. Bjorky is having a down season by his standards, but is still younger and more productive than Coleman, and does a lot of little things to help the team win that don't show up on the scoresheet

I think you are really underrating how effective Coleman is. I find it really strage that you talk about all the little things Bjorkstrand does but act like Coleman isn't a master of those exact same little things. He's one of the best 2-way wingers in the league.

I like Bjorkstrand but Calgary would never do this trade
AK50 a aimé ceci.
19 janv. 2023 à 13 h 33
#6
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 9,671
Mentions "j'aime": 6,414
Quoting: KrakenTheCode
As a Seattle fan, I'm don't think any of these trades as presently constructed make sense for the Kraken. Going in order:

1. I'd much rather have Bjorkstrand than Coleman. Bjorky is having a down season by his standards, but is still younger and more productive than Coleman, and does a lot of little things to help the team win that don't show up on the scoresheet.

2. The value for this one is OK for Seattle, though I think they'd prefer to keep Borgen if possible, as he's evolved into quite the underrated defenseman. Horvat would also be a good fit for what they need at this juncture. However, they're not really at the stage of their competitive window where giving up major assets for a rental. I think Horvat would be a prime offseason target for them in free agency, just not a trade target.

3. Seattle doesn't need a player with Klingberg's profile, and Anaheim would want more anyway.

4. Seattle shouldn't trade away Jones when he's been their best goalie, and the Sharks don't really need him. However, I could see the Kraken going after Reimer as a goalie target. If you remove Jones and bump up the 4th round pick to a 3rd, I think it makes much more sense for both sides and might actually be a deal that gets done.


I think the only way we are getting a 1st for Kling at this point is if we package one of our 2nd round picks with him and retention.

I am as perplexed as you though why hockey pundits keep saying Kling to Seattle is a match. I think Washington is the team that bites.
AK50 et LosPatos a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage