SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

I fix Vancouver

Créé par: CakeEaterBanks
Équipe: 2022-23 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 14 janv. 2023
Publié: 14 janv. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Far weaker team in Vancouver but cap is cleared up. A lot of moves that fans wouldn’t like but that’s the reality we are in. Team will try to take advantage of their salary cap issues. They’ll have over 48 million when Peterson contract is up.

Most of the team are playoff teams or teams wanting to make the dance. Most of em trade their anchor contracts for useful players, for example Myers should pair with Sanderson well making Zub and Chabot the 1st pair.

Minny trading Greenway who’s struggled this season for Boeser who’s perennial 20 goal player that has potential to be 30 goal guy.

NYI gets miller whom they were intrested in at the draft last year. Gives NYI a great 1-2 punch down the middle with Barzal and Miller. Furthermore Millers antics won’t be tolerated by Lou.

LAK gets Schenn and Kuzmenko who’s been great this season. Schenn will replaced the void Roy leaves in the lineup and Kuzmenko brings scoring for a cheap cost.

It’s a meh team but it gives the Canucks a direction. They restock on draft picks, get players that fills needs and prospects to help the pool.
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Dellandrea, Ty
  2. Faksa, Radek
  3. Harley, Thomas
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (DAL)
  5. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (DAL)
DAL
  1. Horvat, Bo (2 750 000 $ retained)
2.
3.
VAN
  1. Zaitsev, Nikita
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (OTT)
4.
VAN
  1. Roy, Matt
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (LAK)
5.
VAN
  1. Vrána, Jakub
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (DET)
6.
VAN
  1. Greenway, Jordan
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (MIN)
MIN
  1. Boeser, Brock (1 500 000 $ retained)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de LAK
Logo de MIN
Logo de VAN
Logo de OTT
Logo de DET
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de NYR
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de DAL
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2025
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de DAL
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $73 940 833 $1 250 000 $2 112 500 $8 559 167 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Islanders de New York
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Stars de Dallas
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance537 500 $$538K)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Stars de Dallas
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Stars de Dallas
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 260 000 $7 260 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 janv. 2023 à 1 h 17
#1
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 28,461
Mentions "j'aime": 11,074
Gonna need to lower these asks.
Wqrrior a aimé ceci.
14 janv. 2023 à 1 h 31
#2
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,662
Mentions "j'aime": 24,577
We have 13 forwards on the roster now plus a second-liner (Moore) and third-liner (Kaliyev) on the injury list, so UFA Kuzmenko isn't the thrill to us that you hope he would be, especially at the cost of Matt Roy OR our second first-round pick in a row, this one coming when there will be some great LhD prospects available in the first two rounds. And if by chance we WERE to trade Matt Roy, Sean Durzi, Sean Walker and Jordan Spence would be ahead of Luke Schenn at RhD. So Los Angeles declines.

I bet that the Rangers would be interested in that package for the Dallas first, though.

I think that the whole point of Ottawa paying a second to dump Zaitsev is to cut cap, not increase it.
Wqrrior, aedoran et palhal a aimé ceci.
14 janv. 2023 à 1 h 53
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 47
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Even if you take the 2nd round pick out of the Ottawa trade… the Senators still don’t make it.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
14 janv. 2023 à 2 h 15
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 10,250
Mentions "j'aime": 3,963
Quoting: WhalersLogoWasTheBest
Even if you take the 2nd round pick out of the Ottawa trade… the Senators still don’t make it.


what if we retained 1-1.5m?

cap equalizes next year, but then they get the better player and the shorter term. I believe OTT was exploring RDs and Myers would fill the hole.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
14 janv. 2023 à 2 h 45
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 127
Mentions "j'aime": 78
Modifié 14 janv. 2023 à 2 h 55
Despite him having low to no trade value right now, Detroit wouldn't pay to move Vrana. All things considered Vrana > Garland. I think if you took the 2nd away Yzerman might have a look, but he's a patient dude. He'd sooner bury Vrana in the minors and ride his contract out to FA before giving up a 2nd and taking on a 4-year deal. Garland is a fiesty dude though...he could be a good add if we lose Bertuzzi. Not having the best year though. Might not crack Detroit's Top 6.
DeadWingsv2, aedoran, Billy12Bob and 2 others a aimé ceci.
14 janv. 2023 à 3 h 12
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 4,897
Mentions "j'aime": 1,406
Considering miller wouldn’t be one of NYIs top 2 Cs not sure how this helps. Also NYI was interested in him before he signed that mammoth of a contract that looks buyout bound before it’s even started. His antics this year certainly haven’t made him a more appealing player. Not really sure how this trade benefits NYI at all.
Dark_Matter, Not_Isles5513, OldNYIfan and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
14 janv. 2023 à 3 h 50
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 21,480
Mentions "j'aime": 11,898
Quoting: Dark_Matter
Despite him having low to no trade value right now, Detroit wouldn't pay to move Vrana. All things considered Vrana > Garland. I think if you took the 2nd away Yzerman might have a look, but he's a patient dude. He'd sooner bury Vrana in the minors and ride his contract out to FA before giving up a 2nd and taking on a 4-year deal. Garland is a fiesty dude though...he could be a good add if we lose Bertuzzi. Not having the best year though. Might not crack Detroit's Top 6.


I agree absolutely no reason to sell Vrana low and there is no way Garland is a 2nd rd better than Vrana.
OldNYIfan et tonyhzs a aimé ceci.
14 janv. 2023 à 7 h 52
#8
1GarthSnowFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 11,738
Mentions "j'aime": 4,799
Quoting: Islesforthecup
Considering miller wouldn’t be one of NYIs top 2 Cs not sure how this helps. Also NYI was interested in him before he signed that mammoth of a contract that looks buyout bound before it’s even started. His antics this year certainly haven’t made him a more appealing player. Not really sure how this trade benefits NYI at all.


I wouldn’t trade Bailey for Miller one for one just because of how bad that contract is.
14 janv. 2023 à 8 h 15
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 14,999
Mentions "j'aime": 12,084
Miller isn’t a good center and isles wouldn’t touch that contract.

Brock Nelson is better than Miller and he makes 6 mill for the next 3 seasons.
palhal et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
14 janv. 2023 à 8 h 29
#10
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,065
Mentions "j'aime": 22,462
Quoting: Db1899
Miller isn’t a good center and isles wouldn’t touch that contract.

Brock Nelson is better than Miller and he makes 6 mill for the next 3 seasons.


Just to add, Pagaeau doesn't waive, and the no team wants Miller's never ending contract, without big retention.
Db1899 et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
14 janv. 2023 à 10 h 8
#11
New Star Rising
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 486
Mentions "j'aime": 130
As a Dallas fan, I wouldn’t want to give up so much for a rental. IMO, Kuzmenko would be a better fit. Maybe the LA trade would work better for Dallas.
14 janv. 2023 à 10 h 54
#12
matt
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 602
Mentions "j'aime": 220
Quoting: Islesforthecup
Considering miller wouldn’t be one of NYIs top 2 Cs not sure how this helps. Also NYI was interested in him before he signed that mammoth of a contract that looks buyout bound before it’s even started. His antics this year certainly haven’t made him a more appealing player. Not really sure how this trade benefits NYI at all.


lol dude is still awesome on the wing he would absolutely be their best winger and make their PP much better than bottom 10 it is now. There is a need there thats why there was rumblings at the draft floor last year. His whole issue this year is he hasnt worked as a C. Both counting and underlying stats this season when hes on the wing are great.
14 janv. 2023 à 12 h 0
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 47
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Quoting: Wqrrior
what if we retained 1-1.5m?

cap equalizes next year, but then they get the better player and the shorter term. I believe OTT was exploring RDs and Myers would fill the hole.


Quoting: Wqrrior
what if we retained 1-1.5m?

cap equalizes next year, but then they get the better player and the shorter term. I believe OTT was exploring RDs and Myers would fill the hole.


Quoting: Wqrrior
what if we retained 1-1.5m?

cap equalizes next year, but then they get the better player and the shorter term. I believe OTT was exploring RDs and Myers would fill the hole.


Quoting: Wqrrior
what if we retained 1-1.5m?

cap equalizes next year, but then they get the better player and the shorter term. I believe OTT was exploring RDs and Myers would fill the hole.


The problem for Ottawa now (and I can’t believe I’m even saying this after the last few years) is that they are in a place where cap numbers are more important than actual dollars.

My guess is they would be more likely to give you the 2nd round pick and just not take back Meyers at all… which I know, is not at all what you are hoping for from a Vancouver perspective.

So I’m just not sure there is a match with these players and teams.
14 janv. 2023 à 12 h 16
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 5,322
Mentions "j'aime": 1,370
ott is not going to trade zeitsev to get a more expensive version of him
14 janv. 2023 à 17 h 33
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 4,897
Mentions "j'aime": 1,406
Quoting: mbaer84
lol dude is still awesome on the wing he would absolutely be their best winger and make their PP much better than bottom 10 it is now. There is a need there thats why there was rumblings at the draft floor last year. His whole issue this year is he hasnt worked as a C. Both counting and underlying stats this season when hes on the wing are great.


Great so you addressed the least important of the 3 concerns now how about the other 2?
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage