SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

changing of the guard

Créé par: michaelpratt21
Équipe: 2022-23 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 9 janv. 2023
Publié: 9 janv. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Yell at me lamoriello
Transactions
1.
NYI
  1. Bear, Ethan
  2. Horvat, Bo
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (VAN)
Détails additionnels:
Horvat resigns in offseason
2.
VAN
  1. Kotkaniemi, Jesperi
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (CAR)
3.
VAN
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (NJD)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de NYR
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de CAR
Logo de VAN
Logo de NJD
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2025
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2582 500 000 $78 492 917 $1 250 000 $2 082 500 $4 007 083 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
4 820 000 $4 820 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
883 750 $883 750 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Islanders de New York
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 260 000 $7 260 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
9 janv. 2023 à 23 h 54
#1
829411
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 233
Mentions "j'aime": 51
Every team says no. NYI for sure says no. The Car trade actually is creative.
joshelkin et MikeyMike01 a aimé ceci.
9 janv. 2023 à 23 h 56
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 9,655
Mentions "j'aime": 9,033
Isles fans are (rightfully) going to rip you to shreds
joshelkin, MikeyMike01 et tm0000 a aimé ceci.
9 janv. 2023 à 23 h 57
#3
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,065
Mentions "j'aime": 22,462
Although I don't think the Canucks do the trade with Canes as you suggest, it's the type of trade that gets done. Two long term bad contracts for one another
Isles don't need a centre, and more silliness basing a trade on a extension. No way the Isles even trade Dobson for Horvat even up.
9 janv. 2023 à 23 h 57
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 9,162
Mentions "j'aime": 2,942
I like the originality of your Carolina trade but we still say no. Miller’s contract is a big negative
9 janv. 2023 à 23 h 58
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 9,162
Mentions "j'aime": 2,942
Quoting: palhal
Although I don't think the Canucks do the trade with Canes as you suggest, it's the type of trade that gets done. Two long term bad contracts for one another
Isles don't need a centre, and more silliness basing a trade on a extension. No way the Isles even trade Dobson for Horvat even up.


Kotkaniemi’s deal isn’t a bad one. The buy out is way too cheap for it to be considered a bad long term deal
palhal a aimé ceci.
10 janv. 2023 à 0 h 2
#6
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,065
Mentions "j'aime": 22,462
You're right. Next three years are very cheap buyouts.....I guess that's one reason the Canes don't trade for Miller.
10 janv. 2023 à 0 h 3
#7
Islanders Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 7,817
Mentions "j'aime": 2,754
Oh man you're gonna hear it for that Isles trade. Dobson is untouchable.
MikeyMike01 a aimé ceci.
10 janv. 2023 à 0 h 4
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 9,162
Mentions "j'aime": 2,942
Quoting: palhal
You're right. Next three years are very cheap buyouts.....I guess that's one reason the Canes don't trade for Miller.


Miller is bad defensively so he wouldn’t play in our scheme well and the contract will age poorly, quickly. 2 reasons
palhal a aimé ceci.
10 janv. 2023 à 0 h 8
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 4,897
Mentions "j'aime": 1,406
Quoting: ecupirate07
Kotkaniemi’s deal isn’t a bad one. The buy out is way too cheap for it to be considered a bad long term deal


If you’re talking about buyouts then it’s a bad deal
bagelbob et Isles10 a aimé ceci.
10 janv. 2023 à 0 h 11
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 9,162
Mentions "j'aime": 2,942
Quoting: Islesforthecup
If you’re talking about buyouts then it’s a bad deal


The buyout is one of the reasons it isn’t a bad deal, yes. Doesn’t mean its the only reason.
10 janv. 2023 à 0 h 46
#11
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: ecupirate07
Kotkaniemi’s deal isn’t a bad one. The buy out is way too cheap for it to be considered a bad long term deal


Even considering a buyout tells you how much of an oopsie that deal was.
bagelbob et Isles10 a aimé ceci.
10 janv. 2023 à 6 h 11
#12
Lets Get Kraken
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 8,487
Mentions "j'aime": 3,403
Even if KK’s deal was bad, Millers is much worse. Besides KK is a perfect fit for the Canes system, and Miller is one of the worst fits for the Canes system. They didn’t want him last year, the Canes certainly don’t want him now.
10 janv. 2023 à 6 h 53
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 9,162
Mentions "j'aime": 2,942
Quoting: Juiceman
Even considering a buyout tells you how much of an oopsie that deal was.


Canes aren’t considering a buy out its just a fact of the deal. The deal hasn’t been an oopsie.
10 janv. 2023 à 7 h 35
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,114
Mentions "j'aime": 4,975
Canes easily pass. Kotkaniemi's 22, he's already one of the best play drivers in the NHL, he's already fantastic defensively and his production is getting better. Miller is on the wrong side of 30, signed for way too much for way too long, has already shown he throws temper tantrums on the ice, and most importantly for a Canes system, CANNOT DEFEND. This is a long term future 3C on a reasonable deal for a buyout candidate the second his scoring regresses in 2-3 years.
fullblowncaniac90 a aimé ceci.
10 janv. 2023 à 8 h 2
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 4
Mentions "j'aime": 1
You can’t have Dobson go away
tm0000 a aimé ceci.
10 janv. 2023 à 17 h 30
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 4,897
Mentions "j'aime": 1,406
Quoting: ecupirate07
The buyout is one of the reasons it isn’t a bad deal, yes. Doesn’t mean its the only reason.


No if you’re discussing why a deal isn’t bad and you mention “if the team doesn’t wants to get out of the contract it won’t cost them too much in dead cap money it’s a bad contract. If it was a good contract that shouldn’t come to mind much less be relevant
10 janv. 2023 à 17 h 53
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 9,162
Mentions "j'aime": 2,942
Quoting: Islesforthecup
No if you’re discussing why a deal isn’t bad and you mention “if the team doesn’t wants to get out of the contract it won’t cost them too much in dead cap money it’s a bad contract. If it was a good contract that shouldn’t come to mind much less be relevant

You’re trying too hard. Its just a fact of the deal. Buyouts are always relevant. Each player is only one injury away from being shells of their former selves or have an injury that nags on for seasons. I get it mentioning KK just triggers people
11 janv. 2023 à 4 h 37
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 4,897
Mentions "j'aime": 1,406
Quoting: ecupirate07
You’re trying too hard. Its just a fact of the deal. Buyouts are always relevant. Each player is only one injury away from being shells of their former selves or have an injury that nags on for seasons. I get it mentioning KK just triggers people


No people don’t say someone has a good deal bc if they would have a terrible injury and would be “shells of their former selves” then they have a good buyout. That’s some insane criteria for what a good contract is.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage