SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Mid Season Report Cards 2022-23

Créé par: NoVaSpartan
Équipe: 2022-23 Capitals de Washington
Date de création initiale: 6 janv. 2023
Publié: 6 janv. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Did it last year and enjoyed doing it, so I'm doing it again!

Here's last years, for reference: https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/3020384

Compared to last year, this team feels like they're playing a lot better. I could go either way with a couple of these different players (Alexeyev and Irwin could be argued up a tier, Protas could be argued down a tier). Overall though, this feels like a different team, in a good way, and not as much shooting themselves in the foot for every toe they have as last year.

Top of the Grade is closest to the next letter grade, and the bottom is almost the next grade down (though this year, a lot of guys are close together so being at the bottom isn't always a way to signify how close they are to the next tier)
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Excelling, Grade A
1800 000 $
Good, Grade B
1800 000 $
Mediocre, Grade C
1800 000 $
Bad, Grade D
1800 000 $
Awful, Grade F
1800 000 $
Not Enough Games, Not Eligible
1800 000 $
Kuemper, Darcy
1800 000 $
Lindgren, Charlie
1800 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
2024
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
2025
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
3182 500 000 $62 510 000 $100 000 $82 500 $19 990 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Excelling, Grade A
800 000 $800 000 $
Good, Grade B
800 000 $800 000 $
Mediocre, Grade C
800 000 $800 000 $
Logo de Capitals de Washington
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
791 667 $791 667 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
863 333 $863 333 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Lindgren, Charlie
800 000 $800 000 $
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
800 000 $800 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Kuemper, Darcy
800 000 $800 000 $
Logo de Capitals de Washington
762 500 $762 500 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
789 167 $789 167 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AD, AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
950 000 $950 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Bad, Grade D
800 000 $800 000 $
Awful, Grade F
800 000 $800 000 $
Logo de Capitals de Washington
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 415 000 $2 415 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
863 333 $863 333 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Not Enough Games, Not Eligible
800 000 $800 000 $
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 166 667 $5 166 667 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
9 200 000 $9 200 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
3 600 000 $3 600 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 janv. 2023 à 11 h 53
#1
Icedragon4405
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 1,765
Mentions "j'aime": 453
Aube-Kubel in F tier he has been awful and Snively can’t be ranked cause they have only played him once. It is frustrating as a caps team to see Snively is the kind of player they need in the lineup a skilled, speedy young player and instead they constantly play a guy like Kubel who is slow has barely any skill doesn’t score and takes awful penalties all the time that really hurts the teams chances it drives me insane that they play kubel over Snively it’s stupid
6 janv. 2023 à 12 h 10
#2
Démarrer sujet
Craig Laughlin Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 5,216
Mentions "j'aime": 5,708
Quoting: Icedragon4405
Aube-Kubel in F tier he has been awful and Snively can’t be ranked cause they have only played him once. It is frustrating as a caps team to see Snively is the kind of player they need in the lineup a skilled, speedy young player and instead they constantly play a guy like Kubel who is slow has barely any skill doesn’t score and takes awful penalties all the time that really hurts the teams chances it drives me insane that they play kubel over Snively it’s stupid


I disagree here. Aube Kubel hasn't been stellar, but he's been far from terrible in all facets. Has brought more speed to the lines he's been on and has been defensively competent in games. Only 5 points could be construed as underwhelming but 5 points in 13 games isn't terrible from a bottom 6er. The penalties are a bit rough but rounded out by other facets of his game.

As for Snively, I chose to rank him as he's been on the roster and uninjured the whole year and in his 6 games, has really failed to show too much that makes me think he should be in the lineup ahead of guys like NAK. He has only 1 assist in those 6 games and to me, hasn't shown a lot to prove himself defensively, especially with larger opportunities to perform by getting 4th line time, as opposed to NAK who's had less opportunities on a worse 3rd line.
All_Knowing et capsfan2121 a aimé ceci.
6 janv. 2023 à 12 h 29
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,632
Mentions "j'aime": 1,030
Quoting: NoVaSpartan
I disagree here. Aube Kubel hasn't been stellar, but he's been far from terrible in all facets. Has brought more speed to the lines he's been on and has been defensively competent in games. Only 5 points could be construed as underwhelming but 5 points in 13 games isn't terrible from a bottom 6er. The penalties are a bit rough but rounded out by other facets of his game.

As for Snively, I chose to rank him as he's been on the roster and uninjured the whole year and in his 6 games, has really failed to show too much that makes me think he should be in the lineup ahead of guys like NAK. He has only 1 assist in those 6 games and to me, hasn't shown a lot to prove himself defensively, especially with larger opportunities to perform by getting 4th line time, as opposed to NAK who's had less opportunities on a worse 3rd line.


Totally agree with NAK and Snively assessment. I actually think NAK is ranked perfectly - he has come in and done a fine-ish job in his role. Irwin and McM are ranked appropriately as well. I initially thought McM should be in F grade, but not having played consistently and not playing his natural position does not help.

The only thing I would slightly disagree with is Eller being an F. I have probably been one of few Caps fans who is "softer" on Eller (as I am with Carlson as well), but Eller has been the best Cap in the faceoff dot (almost 54%), and has been quite good on PKs. Yes, his penalty numbers are bad and only 15 points isn't great (although his linemates were constantly changing). I see him more of a D grade, definitely not F, but, as I write this, I realized it is such a small detail lol
capsfan2121, NoVaSpartan et MVC a aimé ceci.
6 janv. 2023 à 12 h 47
#4
Démarrer sujet
Craig Laughlin Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 5,216
Mentions "j'aime": 5,708
Quoting: All_Knowing
Totally agree with NAK and Snively assessment. I actually think NAK is ranked perfectly - he has come in and done a fine-ish job in his role. Irwin and McM are ranked appropriately as well. I initially thought McM should be in F grade, but not having played consistently and not playing his natural position does not help.

The only thing I would slightly disagree with is Eller being an F. I have probably been one of few Caps fans who is "softer" on Eller (as I am with Carlson as well), but Eller has been the best Cap in the faceoff dot (almost 54%), and has been quite good on PKs. Yes, his penalty numbers are bad and only 15 points isn't great (although his linemates were constantly changing). I see him more of a D grade, definitely not F, but, as I write this, I realized it is such a small detail lol


Yeah, I can get putting Eller in D, and I would tend to agree. Eller is only truly in F as a benchmark for every other player to be compared to. His PK abilities and faceoffs are probably enough to realistically pull him out of F tier.
All_Knowing a aimé ceci.
6 janv. 2023 à 12 h 50
#5
Skip skibbity
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 2,089
Mentions "j'aime": 811
I'd bump Irwin up to mediocre. He's pretty steady back there and you hardly ever notice him (in a good way.) He's nothing special but I don't think he's been bad. Everything else looks spot on in my opinion.
NoVaSpartan et All_Knowing a aimé ceci.
6 janv. 2023 à 12 h 53
#6
Démarrer sujet
Craig Laughlin Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 5,216
Mentions "j'aime": 5,708
Quoting: Highlander1
I'd bump Irwin up to mediocre. He's pretty steady back there and you hardly ever notice him (in a good way.) He's nothing special but I don't think he's been bad. Everything else looks spot on in my opinion.


Fair. I bounced between D and C for Irwin, but in my opinion, he's started to lose some steam recently. C grade would still be fair for him, though.
6 janv. 2023 à 13 h 37
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,236
Mentions "j'aime": 1,852
Irwin up, Dowd up, Fehervary down, McMichael down
6 janv. 2023 à 13 h 44
#8
Démarrer sujet
Craig Laughlin Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 5,216
Mentions "j'aime": 5,708
Quoting: qc14
Irwin up, Dowd up, Fehervary down, McMichael down


Could see and at least semi agree (I'm going to move Dowd up, thought I put him in tier 1 but clearly not) with all but Fehervary this year. I think Feh has been very sneaky good, especially at covering up other players flaws. He's had a few struggles but overall I think he's been very solid. Maybe lower in tier 2 but I've had no real issue with him and I personally wouldn't move him down to tier 3.
6 janv. 2023 à 14 h 36
#9
Always have 2018
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 1,989
Mentions "j'aime": 921
Report cards spot on. Gus, Milano, and Lindgren have been the biggest pleasant surprises in my book. I thought Strome would be great here and he will continue to get better as he gets more comfortable. Hope we sign Strome to at least 5 more years and get Milano and Gus resigned.
NoVaSpartan a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage