SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Deadline Day VGK

Créé par: Giggz77
Équipe: 2022-23 Golden Knights de Vegas
Date de création initiale: 6 janv. 2023
Publié: 6 janv. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
VGK
    Future Considerations
    2.
    VGK
    1. Stalock, Alex
    2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (DAL)
    3.
    CHI
    1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (BUF)
    2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (DAL)
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2023
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de VGK
    2024
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de VGK
    2025
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de VGK
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2382 500 000 $85 223 317 $0 $0 $-2 723 317 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
    10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
    9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
    AD
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
    2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
    5 900 000 $5 900 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
    1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
    1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
    762 500 $762 500 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
    5 200 000 $5 200 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
    8 800 000 $8 800 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
    766 667 $766 667 $
    G
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
    5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
    2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
    2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 6
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    750 000 $750 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
    2 294 150 $2 294 150 $
    DG
    RFA - 3
    Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
    850 000 $850 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
    7 857 143 $7 857 143 $
    DD
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
    1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
    C, AD
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    6 janv. 2023 à 2 h 58
    #1
    Summary Writer
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2022
    Messages: 1,264
    Mentions "j'aime": 329
    Why is Chicago giving you a third for Hill
    6 janv. 2023 à 3 h 35
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    Alex
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2022
    Messages: 716
    Mentions "j'aime": 41
    Quoting: Timmins_Is_Eating_Tims
    Why is Chicago giving you a third for Hill



    Don’t know🤷🏻‍♂️ thought it was fair tbh
    TheeDjeeEem et Garak a aimé ceci.
    6 janv. 2023 à 3 h 35
    #3
    Démarrer sujet
    Alex
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2022
    Messages: 716
    Mentions "j'aime": 41
    Quoting: Giggz77
    Don’t know🤷🏻‍♂️ thought it was fair tbh



    Rebuilding
    Garak a aimé ceci.
    6 janv. 2023 à 8 h 7
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 10,659
    Mentions "j'aime": 10,311
    Quoting: Giggz77
    Rebuilding


    Quoting: Giggz77
    Don’t know🤷🏻‍♂️ thought it was fair tbh


    Think of it this way: That proposal has chicago handing VGK a substantial amount of cap flexibility, a goalie who is playing very well this year, and a 3rd round pick, for a goalie who has been massively underperforming, costs almost $3M, and is a UFA at the end of the season. Which means they are essentially handing VGK Stalock and a 3rd for nothing.
    6 janv. 2023 à 8 h 47
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 447
    Mentions "j'aime": 140
    Quoting: Garak
    Think of it this way: That proposal has chicago handing VGK a substantial amount of cap flexibility, a goalie who is playing very well this year, and a 3rd round pick, for a goalie who has been massively underperforming, costs almost $3M, and is a UFA at the end of the season. Which means they are essentially handing VGK Stalock and a 3rd for nothing.


    I will agree with you on everything but Hill underperforming. He is exactly what you expect from a backup goalie. Maybe even better than your average backup.

    I like your points but I hate over exaggeration
    6 janv. 2023 à 9 h 9
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 10,659
    Mentions "j'aime": 10,311
    Modifié 6 janv. 2023 à 9 h 43
    Quoting: Redguard191
    I will agree with you on everything but Hill underperforming. He is exactly what you expect from a backup goalie. Maybe even better than your average backup.

    I like your points but I hate over exaggeration


    I'm not over exaggerating, though. Stalock is a better and cheaper backup than Hill. As an expiring UFA, Hill is worth nothing to CHI, and as a rebuilding team, he is worth nothing to our rebuild. So, why are we giving up a cheap G that is playing really well this season plus a 3rd round pick, for essentially nothing? There is no exaggeration, its just the truth.

    Also, it's not like we would resign Hill and we probably wouldn't be able to flip him for anything, let alone anything worth while. We have Mrazek under contract next year, and one of our "goaltenders of the future" is set to move to the NHL ranks full time as soon as the end of this season or beginning of next season.
    SociallyHawkward a aimé ceci.
    6 janv. 2023 à 11 h 10
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 447
    Mentions "j'aime": 140
    Quoting: Garak
    I'm not over exaggerating, though. Stalock is a better and cheaper backup than Hill. As an expiring UFA, Hill is worth nothing to CHI, and as a rebuilding team, he is worth nothing to our rebuild. So, why are we giving up a cheap G that is playing really well this season plus a 3rd round pick, for essentially nothing? There is no exaggeration, its just the truth.

    Also, it's not like we would resign Hill and we probably wouldn't be able to flip him for anything, let alone anything worth while. We have Mrazek under contract next year, and one of our "goaltenders of the future" is set to move to the NHL ranks full time as soon as the end of this season or beginning of next season.


    Quoting: Garak
    Think of it this way: That proposal has chicago handing VGK a substantial amount of cap flexibility, a goalie who is playing very well this year, and a 3rd round pick, for a goalie who has been massively underperforming, costs almost $3M, and is a UFA at the end of the season. Which means they are essentially handing VGK Stalock and a 3rd for nothing.


    You completely ignored the fact that I was responding to this line " for a goalie who has been massively underperforming". Chicago can keep their 35 year old goalie because it makes sense for them with a goalie coming up in their system.
    Garak a aimé ceci.
    6 janv. 2023 à 12 h 5
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 10,659
    Mentions "j'aime": 10,311
    Quoting: Redguard191
    You completely ignored the fact that I was responding to this line " for a goalie who has been massively underperforming". Chicago can keep their 35 year old goalie because it makes sense for them with a goalie coming up in their system.


    Oh, yeah. Maybe massive is the wrong word. I guess I just expected a lot more from him considering his age and all the hype around him the last few years. He is making almost $3M this year, though. That is a pretty big contract for a backup, and, although he has had some brilliant performances, he lacks consistency. But he is still only 26 and could blossom given a larger role in the near future, so that is a positive. Either way, as a UFA and without an extension, he has no trade value specifically to CHI. He might have value with some retention to a team with playoff aspirations looking for promising G depth and/or someone with the potential to take over starting duties in the near future. But I'm not sure how much. Especially because other GM's will probably try to leverage VGK's cap situation against them.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage