SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Two potential trades

Créé par: CB2022
Équipe: 2022-23 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 2 janv. 2023
Publié: 2 janv. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Trade #1: According to David Pagnotta (@TheFourthPeriod), Edmonton is looking to swap Jesse Puljujarvi for another bottom-six forward. There have also been rumors linking Edmonton to Sam Lafferty. You can connect the dots…

Why it makes sense for Edmonton: Lafferty is versatile, a hard worker, and cheap. He would save them nearly $2 million in cap space and is signed for only $1.15 million next season. Not to mention that he is currently out-producing Puljujarvi on team that scores 40% less.

Why it makes sense for Chicago: Puljujarvi is an obvious change of scenery candidate. His underlying numbers have always been solid. He is also a good skater for his size and forechecks well, two things Chicago values. Cap space won’t be an issue for Chicago and they can give Puljujarvi top-six minutes after the trade deadline.

Trade #2: According to Kevin Weekes (@KevinWeekes), Ottawa is “willing to move a high draft pick” to accommodate a Nikita Zaitsev trade.

Why it makes sense for Ottawa: Dorion has to believe that Ottawa will be a playoff team by the 24-25 season. That means the pick going to Chicago would be in the second-half of the first round. The potential sale of the team also complicates the Zaitsev situation.

Why it makes sense for Chicago: Money isn’t an issue for Chicago. They are in the midst of a full-blown rebuild and are stockpiling as many future draft picks as they can. There is no reason for them to *not* make this trade.
Transactions
1.
2.
CHI
  1. Zaitsev, Nikita
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (OTT)
Détails additionnels:
2025 1st round pick (OTT) is top-10 protected
OTT
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2024 (CHI)
Rachats de contrats
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de DAL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de VAN
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
2025
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $71 851 796 $237 500 $82 500 $10 648 204 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
758 333 $758 333 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
758 333 $758 333 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
975 000 $975 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
859 167 $859 167 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
900 000 $900 000 $
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
2 janv. 2023 à 15 h 35
#1
Hawks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,590
Mentions "j'aime": 1,598
You say you can give Puljujarvi top 6 minutes in the description but then put him on 3rd line…

I can imagine Ottawa wanting to move on from Zaitsev so badly they give someone a 1st and get nothing in return. Zaitsev + 1st for Mitchell
CB2022 et Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
2 janv. 2023 à 15 h 45
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2017
Messages: 18,913
Mentions "j'aime": 9,205
1st trade, IMO, Lafferty has more value right now as he is extremely cheap in terms of cap hit for what he brings to the ice and is signed for another season. JP for $3m isn't worth his cap hit as of now.

2nd trade, I highly highly doubt it takes a 1st to move Zaits...more like a 2nd.

Perhaps a better trade is...

Ottawa gets = Murphy, Lafferty
Chicago gets = Zaits, 1st, JP, 3rd
CB2022 a aimé ceci.
2 janv. 2023 à 15 h 48
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 23
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Quoting: Jco5ta5
You say you can give Puljujarvi top 6 minutes in the description but then put him on 3rd line…

I can imagine Ottawa wanting to move on from Zaitsev so badly they give someone a 1st and get nothing in return. Zaitsev + 1st for Mitchell


After the trade deadline. That should open up some spots in the top-six. I'd personally start him with Toews, but the coaching staff seems to like Toews and Raddysh together.

I'd be fine with moving Mitchell, but I'm also not very high on him. I think Ottawa is pretty desperate to move him. They won't buy him out due to the ownership situation. They were also willing to trade from #7OA to #16OA just to get rid of Murray's contract.
2 janv. 2023 à 15 h 54
#4
Seiders on the Storm
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2020
Messages: 9,890
Mentions "j'aime": 7,764
Couldn't Ottawa just buyout Zaitsev this summer and keep the 1st?
Newgod77 a aimé ceci.
2 janv. 2023 à 15 h 58
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 23
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Quoting: ChiHawk
1st trade, IMO, Lafferty has more value right now as he is extremely cheap in terms of cap hit for what he brings to the ice and is signed for another season. JP for $3m isn't worth his cap hit as of now.

2nd trade, I highly highly doubt it takes a 1st to move Zaits...more like a 2nd.

Perhaps a better trade is...

Ottawa gets = Murphy, Lafferty
Chicago gets = Zaits, 1st, JP, 3rd


I agree Lafferty has more value now. I'm just not sure what you could realistically get in a trade for him. Would the FO rather have *another* 3rd round pick or take a chance on someone like Puljujarvi?

A first for Zaitsev may be a bit much. But I also think that it will take more than a second to move his contract. New York had to trade 2 seconds (one was a conditional 2nd/3rd) to get rid of Nemeth, who only had a $2.5 million cap hit. That would be the starting point, in my opinion.
2 janv. 2023 à 16 h 4
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 23
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Quoting: MoreHitzSeider
Couldn't Ottawa just buyout Zaitsev this summer and keep the 1st?


I've heard a few reputable people say that Ottawa doesn't want to add any more dead money to their expense sheet while they are trying to sell the team. I think that is why a buyout is off the table and they're trying to trade him.
2 janv. 2023 à 16 h 27
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,186
Mentions "j'aime": 4,797
The Zaitsev NTC probably complicates things here. Doubt he would waive to come here. I have also seen Friedman recently link Mccabe to EDM. I wonder if a Mccabe+Lafferty for JP+ deal is in the works
CB2022 a aimé ceci.
2 janv. 2023 à 16 h 51
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2020
Messages: 204
Mentions "j'aime": 127
I don't watch JP a lot but I think his situation is similar to Kubalik last year. His QO will be significant and his play this year hasn't backed that up. So it is a risk. Hawks won't have cap issues but why would you risk $3+ mil that he can play better without McDavid than with him?
CB2022 a aimé ceci.
2 janv. 2023 à 17 h 5
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 23
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Quoting: Wadejos123
The Zaitsev NTC probably complicates things here. Doubt he would waive to come here. I have also seen Friedman recently link Mccabe to EDM. I wonder if a Mccabe+Lafferty for JP+ deal is in the works


Out of curiosity, why do you think Zaitsev would not waive? Yes it's a glorified AHL roster, but I doubt any contenders would take him. Chicago is a pretty nice place to be rich and he would get NHL ice time.
2 janv. 2023 à 17 h 8
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 23
Mentions "j'aime": 5
Quoting: Tucson
I don't watch JP a lot but I think his situation is similar to Kubalik last year. His QO will be significant and his play this year hasn't backed that up. So it is a risk. Hawks won't have cap issues but why would you risk $3+ mil that he can play better without McDavid than with him?


Very good point. I felt like the moves made last offseason were more about changing the team's style of play. Hence why they signed Domi and Athanasiou for similar amounts as Kubalik and Strome. Puljujarvi seems to fit the mold of what the new FO is looking for. But his QO could definitely be a deterrent.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage