SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Read the Caption pls

Créé par: Matthew13
Équipe: 2022-23 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 12 déc. 2022
Publié: 13 déc. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
A few notes (Trade done before deadline)
1. I dont think this or any trade for Karlsson is happening, Holland is neither creative or daring enough to do something like this. Not bashing him its just not his style.
2. I don't want this trade to happen. It makes our right side a more offensive (not a need) and at best there is a small to negligible improvement in defense (a desperate need).
3. That all said I think that this is probably the way to go about it. Double retention almost evenly spread between the teams to keep it managable.
- Sharks get a defensemen they can sell for a 3rd or 2nd at the deadline
- Sharks get a bottom 6 forward with potential, they can keep or sell at 50% at the deadline.
- 1st round pick helps the rebuild
4. Chicago is probably more than 5 years out of trying to compete so the retention shouldnt be an issue. Still have two spots to shop Toews and Kane at the deadline and get a 2nd and a bottom 6 forward for their trouble.

Looking at it now I am probably light on what Im sending to Chicago for that much retention probably throw in a 4th?
Lastly what the Oilers are sending to San Jose is super low for a defensemen with the production Karlsson has had this year with retention, HOWEVER, he is 32 years old, has a history of injuries, history of being really mid for a while before this season, and has 5 years left on his contract. I think if he is traded this season the return will be of similar value to this regardless of who he goes too.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Karlsson, Erik
54 250 000 $
Transactions
1.
EDM
    Sent to Chicago for Retention on Karlsson
    (4250000x5)
    CHI
    1. Benson, Tyler
    2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
    2.
    EDM
      Erik Karlsson
      Retained 3000000 x 5
      SJS
      1. Barrie, Tyson
      2. Puljujärvi, Jesse
      3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
      Rachats de contrats
      Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
      2023
      Logo de EDM
      Logo de EDM
      Logo de EDM
      Logo de EDM
      2024
      Logo de EDM
      Logo de EDM
      Logo de EDM
      Logo de EDM
      Logo de EDM
      2025
      Logo de EDM
      Logo de EDM
      Logo de EDM
      Logo de EDM
      Logo de EDM
      Logo de EDM
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2282 500 000 $81 212 333 $896 000 $2 200 000 $1 287 667 $
      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
      AG, C
      NMC
      UFA - 7
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
      C
      NMC
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
      AD, AG
      NMC
      UFA - 6
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
      AG, AD
      NMC
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
      C, AG
      M-NTC, NMC
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
      AD
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
      AG, C
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      798 000 $798 000 $
      C
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      750 000 $750 000 $
      AG, AD
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
      C, AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      850 000 $850 000 $
      AG, C, AD
      UFA - 1
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
      DG
      NMC
      UFA - 8
      Karlsson, Erik
      4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
      G
      M-NTC
      UFA - 5
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
      DG/DD
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      750 000 $750 000 $
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
      DG
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
      DD
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      750 000 $750 000 $
      DG
      UFA - 1
      Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      4 167 000 $4 167 000 $
      DG
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
      2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
      G
      UFA - 1

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner
      13 déc. 2022 à 22 h 49
      #1
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: févr. 2022
      Messages: 1,371
      Mentions "j'aime": 147
      The only reason why a Karlson trade will have minimal retained salary is because of how the salary cap is structured.

      We need a luxury tax as the biggest issue the NHL is facing is paying off old escrow, a luxury tax would provide the means to do that.
      13 déc. 2022 à 22 h 50
      #2
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: janv. 2017
      Messages: 9,288
      Mentions "j'aime": 4,398
      I'd say you're very light on what you're offering Chicago to retain that much for that long, and it's possible the 'Hawks may want all three retention spots come the TDL as they could be shipping out more than just Toews & Kane (Domi & Athanasiou for example, possibly even Johnson), so I think the 'Hawks are probably a bad candidate and you'd need to offer a lot more to get them to do that retention.
      SociallyHawkward et Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
      13 déc. 2022 à 22 h 51
      #3
      In Connor We Trust
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2020
      Messages: 3,314
      Mentions "j'aime": 2,076
      Chicago is going to want a lot more for retaining 21 million.
      SociallyHawkward, TJTwolf, Hawksguy81 and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
      13 déc. 2022 à 22 h 52
      #4
      Démarrer sujet
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: févr. 2022
      Messages: 122
      Mentions "j'aime": 15
      Quoting: CakeEaterBanks
      The only reason why a Karlson trade will have minimal retained salary is because of how the salary cap is structured.

      We need a luxury tax as the biggest issue the NHL is facing is paying off old escrow, a luxury tax would provide the means to do that.


      I've thought about that too but I like that the rich teams are held to the same standards as the poor teams. I wouldn't like it if an organization could just buy a team
      13 déc. 2022 à 23 h 0
      #5
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: févr. 2022
      Messages: 1,371
      Mentions "j'aime": 147
      Quoting: Matthew13
      I've thought about that too but I like that the rich teams are held to the same standards as the poor teams. I wouldn't like it if an organization could just buy a team


      To be fair up to the owner. An owner can build a poor team and bad market into being a small market but committed fanbase that wants to spend. Case in point the Tampa bay Lightning, and Columbus Blue Jackets.
      13 déc. 2022 à 23 h 37
      #6
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2017
      Messages: 18,913
      Mentions "j'aime": 9,205
      You seriously think Chicago or any team will do that for a 2nd? laugh
      Hawksguy81 et Garak a aimé ceci.
      14 déc. 2022 à 10 h 56
      #7
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 10,437
      Mentions "j'aime": 10,009
      That is a ridiculous proposition. If CHI were willing to retain this much for this long, they might as well attempt to shop Jones with 50% retention.
      14 déc. 2022 à 13 h 43
      #8
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2021
      Messages: 1,119
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,346
      Retention of that much for that long is not going to happen. Chicago declines because it kills a retention slot for too long.
       
      Répondre
      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
      Question:
      Options:
      Ajouter une option
      Soumettre le sondage