SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Edmundson trade

Créé par: Wreckless
Équipe: 2022-23 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 5 déc. 2022
Publié: 5 déc. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
MTL
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2024
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2025
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
1982 500 000 $74 749 000 $896 000 $1 350 000 $7 751 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
798 000 $798 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
875 000 $875 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 167 000 $4 167 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
762 500 $762 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
807 500 $807 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $863 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, AD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
5 déc. 2022 à 11 h 3
#26
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 9,687
Mentions "j'aime": 4,536
Quoting: Garak
I may have been exaggerating. But Wreckless had an original post that had two 1st going to MTL and then quickly deleted it and made this proposition before I could submit my original comment, so I got flustered. haha. Either way, IF, and that's a big IF, MTL does get a 1st for him it won't be in 2023. I can almost guarantee that. Probably not even 2024. The pick would probably have to be after the expiration of his contract. Chiarot is garbage and should be a lesson learned to all GM's around the league, not a guideline for LHD trades.


This is why I think Chiarot will be an exception rather than the rule. He's a terrible dman who FLA grossly overpaid for, so on one hand, will GM's learn or can you just never discount the fact that at least one GM could totally overvalue him?
Garak a aimé ceci.
5 déc. 2022 à 11 h 4
#27
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,213
Mentions "j'aime": 6,242
Quoting: jake4leafs
3 years ago he had 6 tk with 69 gv, hes just not that good, so his experience on winning teams isnt worth jack, and his personal life isnt affecting his play. hes had those horrible numbers for a few years now, he might be worth a 3rd


Oh you like Tk vs Gv stats comps, Reilly had 19 tk and 75 gv in 19-20, in fact over the last 4 years Reilly has a takeaway to giveaway ratio of 84 to 214. Guess Reilly shouldn't even be in the ECHL!!! wow he is horrible!!!
5 déc. 2022 à 11 h 5
#28
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 10,437
Mentions "j'aime": 10,014
Quoting: Campabee
For those who think Chiarot is the exception and shouldn't have returned a 1st + and that Edmundson won't get a 1st + 2nd, I would like to remind you that Kulak who is a good bottom 4 D man but is no where near the same calibre as Chiarot returned a 2nd a struggling prospect and a 7th. Chiarot's return is on par with a middle pairing guy on a decent contract with retention. Eddy will return better than Chiarot (if he can remain healthy) Expect the return to be around a 1st + 2nd or good prospect. Using Edmonton as an example the return would be 2023 1st + Holloway or Schaefer, if we have to take back cap you can expect to upgrade the prospect to like Bourgault or Broberg depending on the amount of cap we take back (if it's just Foegle then maybe you just add a 3rd if it is Foegle and Puljujarvi or Barrie then the prospect is upgraded)


I will admit, i may have overreacted. It is possible a 1st could be involved, but I doubt anyone would give up a 2023 1st for him. And NONE of the prospects/young players you mentioned would ever be involved, especially not along side a 1st round pick.
CD282, arab05 et JAKE6 a aimé ceci.
5 déc. 2022 à 11 h 7
#29
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 9,687
Mentions "j'aime": 4,536
Quoting: Campabee
For those who think Chiarot is the exception and shouldn't have returned a 1st + and that Edmundson won't get a 1st + 2nd, I would like to remind you that Kulak who is a good bottom 4 D man but is no where near the same calibre as Chiarot returned a 2nd a struggling prospect and a 7th. Chiarot's return is on par with a middle pairing guy on a decent contract with retention. Eddy will return better than Chiarot (if he can remain healthy) Expect the return to be around a 1st + 2nd or good prospect. Using Edmonton as an example the return would be 2023 1st + Holloway or Schaefer, if we have to take back cap you can expect to upgrade the prospect to like Bourgault or Broberg depending on the amount of cap we take back (if it's just Foegle then maybe you just add a 3rd if it is Foegle and Puljujarvi or Barrie then the prospect is upgraded)


I always love when people say they know things for sure. Don't tell you know for sure, because you don't. The market will dictate most of this, not the comparison to Chiarot. That's why EVERY deadline there are players who get more than they should and there players who get less than they should.

The biggest x-factor is never underestimating a GM who will overvalue. That's what it will come down to. Ed having term will affect his value because it will affect which teams target him. There are too many factors to say you know for sure. What I do is called guessing, because I nor you, have no idea yet.
Garak a aimé ceci.
5 déc. 2022 à 11 h 7
#30
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 10,437
Mentions "j'aime": 10,014
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
This is why I think Chiarot will be an exception rather than the rule. He's a terrible dman who FLA grossly overpaid for, so on one hand, will GM's learn or can you just never discount the fact that at least one GM could totally overvalue him?


True. I'm sure there is one GM that will be susceptible to Hughes snake oil salesmanship.
Mr_Gardoki a aimé ceci.
5 déc. 2022 à 11 h 10
#31
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,213
Mentions "j'aime": 6,242
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
I always love when people say they know things for sure. Don't tell you know for sure, because you don't. The market will dictate most of this, not the comparison to Chiarot. That's why EVERY deadline there are players who get more than they should and there players who get less than they should.

The biggest x-factor is never underestimating a GM who will overvalue. That's what it will come down to. Ed having term will affect his value because it will affect which teams target him. There are too many factors to say you know for sure. What I do is called guessing, because I nor you, have no idea yet.


Where did I say I knew anything I wrote? Also please reread that cause I said Kulak is the benchmark not Chiarot. Kulak's return was a 2nd + 7th and a D level prospect, are you trying to say Kulak is better than Eddy or Chiarot?
5 déc. 2022 à 11 h 16
#32
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 1,250
Mentions "j'aime": 465
Quoting: Campabee
Oh you like Tk vs Gv stats comps, Reilly had 19 tk and 75 gv in 19-20, in fact over the last 4 years Reilly has a takeaway to giveaway ratio of 84 to 214. Guess Reilly shouldn't even be in the ECHL!!! wow he is horrible!!!


Don't know if you can count, but 84 to 214 is much much better than 6 to 69. Rielly is also a pure offensive defenseman, while Edmundson is a "shutdown" defenseman. You're just hurting your own argument.
JAKE6 a aimé ceci.
5 déc. 2022 à 11 h 18
#33
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 1,250
Mentions "j'aime": 465
Quoting: Campabee
Where did I say I knew anything I wrote? Also please reread that cause I said Kulak is the benchmark not Chiarot. Kulak's return was a 2nd + 7th and a D level prospect, are you trying to say Kulak is better than Eddy or Chiarot?


Kulak is definitely better than Chiarot
5 déc. 2022 à 11 h 19
#34
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 9,687
Mentions "j'aime": 4,536
Quoting: Campabee
Where did I say I knew anything I wrote? Also please reread that cause I said Kulak is the benchmark not Chiarot. Kulak's return was a 2nd + 7th and a D level prospect, are you trying to say Kulak is better than Eddy or Chiarot?


But neither can be the bench-mark because it's an entirely new market. Supply/Demand.

Edmundson having term may wind up hurting his chance of being dealt to a contender. Most contending teams are up against the cap, so depending on what their roster situation looks like next year it may cancel him out as a target entirely, and this will absolutely affect his value since there may only be a few teams in on him, not to mention the UFA market next year is pretty solid for dmen. Non-contending teams MAY think, why would I spend big futures when I can go shopping this off-season since there's no immediate need.

In a bubble? Sure, Edumndson is probably worth a 1st. Just far too many x-factors. I think the fact Ghost and Klingberg will be available will hurt his return.
5 déc. 2022 à 11 h 20
#35
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 9,687
Mentions "j'aime": 4,536
Quoting: LukaTAG
Kulak is definitely better than Chiarot


That's irrelevant.
5 déc. 2022 à 11 h 26
#36
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 1,250
Mentions "j'aime": 465
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
That's irrelevant.


He literally asked about it
5 déc. 2022 à 11 h 34
#37
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,213
Mentions "j'aime": 6,242
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
But neither can be the bench-mark because it's an entirely new market. Supply/Demand.

Edmundson having term may wind up hurting his chance of being dealt to a contender. Most contending teams are up against the cap, so depending on what their roster situation looks like next year it may cancel him out as a target entirely, and this will absolutely affect his value since there may only be a few teams in on him, not to mention the UFA market next year is pretty solid for dmen. Non-contending teams MAY think, why would I spend big futures when I can go shopping this off-season since there's no immediate need.

In a bubble? Sure, Edumndson is probably worth a 1st. Just far too many x-factors. I think the fact Ghost and Klingberg will be available will hurt his return.


Eddy having term means 2 playoff runs as opposed to just 1, and his cap hit is 3.5 Mil, it's much easier to move that kind of money (and cheaper) than it is to move 5+. Klingberg will return a 1st ++ for sure, I think teams are souring on Ghost though.
5 déc. 2022 à 11 h 45
#38
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 9,687
Mentions "j'aime": 4,536
Modifié 5 déc. 2022 à 11 h 53
Quoting: Campabee
Eddy having term means 2 playoff runs as opposed to just 1, and his cap hit is 3.5 Mil, it's much easier to move that kind of money (and cheaper) than it is to move 5+. Klingberg will return a 1st ++ for sure, I think teams are souring on Ghost though.


Right, but how many contending and playoff-bound teams have $3.5M in free cap space and/or roster space? Proration for the deadline is one thing, but next season?

Also, where have you seen anything implying teams are souring on Ghost?
5 déc. 2022 à 11 h 54
#39
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,213
Mentions "j'aime": 6,242
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
Right, but how many contending and playoff-bound teams have $3.5M in free cap space and/or roster space? Proration for the deadline is one thing, but next season?


Teams who have been reported to be interested in Edmundson can move money to fit him. Take Edmonton for example, Moving just Barrie or moving Foegle and Puljujarvi get the space needed and LA can move Arvidsson, teams can make these types of moves and often do to facilitate a trade they want to make.
5 déc. 2022 à 11 h 55
#40
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 9,687
Mentions "j'aime": 4,536
Quoting: Campabee
Teams who have been reported to be interested in Edmundson can move money to fit him. Take Edmonton for example, Moving just Barrie or moving Foegle and Puljujarvi get the space needed and LA can move Arvidsson, teams can make these types of moves and often do to facilitate a trade they want to make.


Where are these reports?

Also, I edited my quote, so where are these reports that teams are souring on Ghost?
5 déc. 2022 à 12 h 2
#41
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,213
Mentions "j'aime": 6,242
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
Where are these reports?

Also, I edited my quote, so where are these reports that teams are souring on Ghost?


I never said there were reports of teams souring on Ghost, I said I think teams are to sour on Ghost. I could be wrong and probably am since I have not followed his progress much since the trade lol.
5 déc. 2022 à 12 h 3
#42
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 9,687
Mentions "j'aime": 4,536
Quoting: Campabee
I never said there were reports of teams souring on Ghost, I said I think teams are to sour on Ghost. I could be wrong and probably am since I have not followed his progress much since the trade lol.


Then what could you be possibly basing that on to make a claim like that? You said you haven't followed his progress, but just making a guess based on absolutely nothing that teams are souring on him?

I'm not trying to flame you, but come on, man. Making a claim based what you think is happening in your mind?
5 déc. 2022 à 12 h 9
#43
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,213
Mentions "j'aime": 6,242
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
Then what could you be possibly basing that on to make a claim like that? You said you haven't followed his progress, but just making a guess based on absolutely nothing that teams are souring on him?

I'm not trying to flame you, but come on, man. Making a claim based what you think is happening in your mind?


No I get it, I simply based my opinion on some of the comments on here and other sites prior to the trade from Philly. I think if other GM's had valued him the Flyer's wouldn't have had to "dump" him on the Yotes.
5 déc. 2022 à 12 h 10
#44
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 9,687
Mentions "j'aime": 4,536
Quoting: Campabee
No I get it, I simply based my opinion on some of the comments on here and other sites prior to the trade from Philly. I think if other GM's had valued him the Flyer's wouldn't have had to "dump" him on the Yotes.


Ghost is killing it this year and will have a very cap-friendly hit come the deadline.
5 déc. 2022 à 12 h 47
#45
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 15,213
Mentions "j'aime": 6,242
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
Ghost is killing it this year and will have a very cap-friendly hit come the deadline.


Like I said, I haven't really followed him at all and I based it on the Flyers having to pay a 2nd + to dump him. If he is doing that well then I stand corrected lol
5 déc. 2022 à 14 h 18
#46
Let Him Cook
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 4,011
Mentions "j'aime": 962
Quoting: Campabee
For those who think Chiarot is the exception and shouldn't have returned a 1st + and that Edmundson won't get a 1st + 2nd, I would like to remind you that Kulak who is a good bottom 4 D man but is no where near the same calibre as Chiarot returned a 2nd a struggling prospect and a 7th. Chiarot's return is on par with a middle pairing guy on a decent contract with retention. Eddy will return better than Chiarot (if he can remain healthy) Expect the return to be around a 1st + 2nd or good prospect. Using Edmonton as an example the return would be 2023 1st + Holloway or Schaefer, if we have to take back cap you can expect to upgrade the prospect to like Bourgault or Broberg depending on the amount of cap we take back (if it's just Foegle then maybe you just add a 3rd if it is Foegle and Puljujarvi or Barrie then the prospect is upgraded)


anderson for the 7th overall vibes all over again. edmundson is worth a second MAX
1 juill. 2023 à 12 h 18
#47
Let Him Cook
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 4,011
Mentions "j'aime": 962
see. XDDDD
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage