SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Foundation of a few trades who adds what where

Créé par: ItalChech
Équipe: 2023-24 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 2 déc. 2022
Publié: 2 déc. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
1950 000 $
1950 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
87 850 000 $
1950 000 $
1950 000 $
1950 000 $
1950 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
44 500 000 $
44 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
MTL
  1. Mangiapane, Andrew
Détails additionnels:
who adds what
2.
3.
MTL
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
EDM
  1. Edmundson, Joel (1 750 000 $ retained)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de MTL
Logo de FLA
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de PIT
Logo de VGK
Logo de MTL
Logo de CGY
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2024
Logo de MTL
Logo de EDM
Logo de COL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de EDM
2025
Logo de MTL
Logo de CGY
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2185 500 000 $76 961 666 $1 170 000 $3 920 000 $8 538 334 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 8
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 362 500 $3 362 500 $
C, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 7
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 925 000 $1 925 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance420 000 $$420K)
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
828 333 $828 333 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
766 667 $766 667 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
762 500 $762 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
885 000 $885 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance80 000 $$80K)
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
890 000 $890 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance275 000 $$275K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
918 333 $918 333 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
835 000 $835 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance57 500 $$58K)
AG, AD
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
875 000 $875 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
950 000 $950 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
RFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
2 déc. 2022 à 1 h 42
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 2,671
Mentions "j'aime": 1,027
CGY would have to add a 1st for Anderson value and another 1st to dump Mangiapane.
Mental_yuppi a aimé ceci.
2 déc. 2022 à 1 h 49
#2
Démarrer sujet
Habs
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 518
Mentions "j'aime": 72
Quoting: Mental_yuppi
I don't think habs do dvorak for boeser 1 for 1 and you added harris, also the anderson trade is horrible for MTL,

I'm not sure if you're that clueless or a troll


i did say it was a foundation for a trade, so no not a troll or clueless. just asking for rational advice for what else may be needed and by which team
2 déc. 2022 à 1 h 50
#3
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Canucks decline easily. If we trade Boeser, it isn't for another overpaid forward. We are likely headed for a rebuild
2 déc. 2022 à 1 h 56
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,066
Mentions "j'aime": 9,332
Quoting: LIRIK
CGY would have to add a 1st for Anderson value and another 1st to dump Mangiapane.


Mangiapane > Anderson though. And Anderson has a worse contract
M_Swann, aedoran, SydBarrett and 7 others a aimé ceci.
2 déc. 2022 à 2 h 4
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 2,671
Mentions "j'aime": 1,027
Quoting: mv21227
Mangiapane > Anderson though. And Anderson has a worse contract


Not only Anderson is better than Mangiapane, but he would be CGY first line RW.

He will be traded for a 1st or something of equal value.
Mental_yuppi a aimé ceci.
2 déc. 2022 à 2 h 11
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,066
Mentions "j'aime": 9,332
Quoting: LIRIK
Not only Anderson is better than Mangiapane, but he would be CGY first line RW.

He will be traded for a 1st or something of equal value.


How exactly is Anderson better than Mangiapane? Mangiapane has outproduced him each of the last 4 seasons, and is better defensively

Anderson may be traded for a 1st+, and whatever GM makes that trade for him probably deserves to be fired, but he’s not better than Mangiapane, and has an awful contract. In all honesty Montreal should take whatever they can get for him so they get out of his awful contract
Traptor, Luguber, Not_Isles5513 and 3 others a aimé ceci.
2 déc. 2022 à 2 h 12
#7
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: LIRIK
Not only Anderson is better than Mangiapane, but he would be CGY first line RW.

He will be traded for a 1st or something of equal value.


There is legit no way you think Anderson is better… this is why nobody takes people like you seriously
mv21227, aedoran, SydBarrett and 6 others a aimé ceci.
2 déc. 2022 à 2 h 25
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 10,465
Mentions "j'aime": 8,106
Quoting: LIRIK
CGY would have to add a 1st for Anderson value and another 1st to dump Mangiapane.


Quoting: Mental_yuppi
I don't think habs do dvorak for boeser 1 for 1 and you added harris, also the anderson trade is horrible for MTL,

I'm not sure if you're that clueless or a troll


These must be jokes right?
SydBarrett, Traptor, Luguber and 5 others a aimé ceci.
2 déc. 2022 à 2 h 32
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 2,671
Mentions "j'aime": 1,027
Quoting: Lancebmx
These must be jokes right?


You don't think Anderson will be traded for a 1st?
2 déc. 2022 à 2 h 34
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,066
Mentions "j'aime": 9,332
Quoting: LIRIK
You don't think Anderson will be traded for a 1st?


It think it’s more that if you think Mangiapane costs a 1st to dump then Anderson costs multiple 1sts to dump
SydBarrett, Lenny7, EsoYeezus69 and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
2 déc. 2022 à 2 h 38
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 560
Mentions "j'aime": 175
Quoting: Lancebmx
These must be jokes right?


Habs have absolutely no use for another winger, nothing to do with boeser value
2 déc. 2022 à 2 h 39
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 10,465
Mentions "j'aime": 8,106
Quoting: LIRIK
You don't think Anderson will be traded for a 1st?


Quoting: mv21227
It think it’s more that if you think Mangiapane costs a 1st to dump then Anderson costs multiple 1sts to dump


What he said. Anderson might get a first by some desperate gm that likes his style of play. I don't think he's worth a first at all. I wouldn't want him on my team at all, add in his contract and that would be even less. I would take Mangiapane over Anderson all day every day, even with his slow start.
SydBarrett, Luguber, Xspyrit and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
2 déc. 2022 à 2 h 42
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 10,465
Mentions "j'aime": 8,106
Quoting: Mental_yuppi
Habs have absolutely no use for another winger, nothing to do with boeser value


That's understandable then.
2 déc. 2022 à 2 h 45
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 2,671
Mentions "j'aime": 1,027
Quoting: mv21227
It think it’s more that if you think Mangiapane costs a 1st to dump then Anderson costs multiple 1sts to dump


That comment will look awful when he's traded for a 1st or more.
2 déc. 2022 à 3 h 40
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 21,678
Mentions "j'aime": 12,025
Quoting: mv21227
Mangiapane > Anderson though. And Anderson has a worse contract


I was thinking the same thing and Mangiapane is younger as well
SydBarrett, Luguber, Lenny7 and 4 others a aimé ceci.
2 déc. 2022 à 5 h 12
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 2,671
Mentions "j'aime": 1,027
Quoting: Juiceman
There is legit no way you think Anderson is better… this is why nobody takes people like you seriously


What do you think Anderson will be traded for? And what would Calgary get for Mangiapane?
2 déc. 2022 à 9 h 35
#17
GO FLAMES GO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 18,280
Mentions "j'aime": 10,619
Quoting: LIRIK
CGY would have to add a 1st for Anderson value and another 1st to dump Mangiapane.


Just because Mangiapane is struggling a bit, doesn't mean he has a bad contract
2 déc. 2022 à 10 h 9
#18
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: Gmonwy
Just because Mangiapane is struggling a bit, doesn't mean he has a bad contract


A struggling Mangiapane is still producing more than Anderson 😂
Gmonwy et Xspyrit a aimé ceci.
2 déc. 2022 à 10 h 47
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,066
Mentions "j'aime": 9,332
Quoting: LIRIK
That comment will look awful when he's traded for a 1st or more.


He may get traded for a 1st+, but he’s not close to being better than Mangiapane. Please explain what makes Anderson better
Xspyrit a aimé ceci.
2 déc. 2022 à 11 h 43
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,495
Mentions "j'aime": 3,718
Quoting: LIRIK
CGY would have to add a 1st for Anderson value and another 1st to dump Mangiapane.


This is a revenge joke right? Mangiapane scored 35 goals last season (27 at ES+SH), which is more than Anderson had points


FZNOE8SX0AA_znI?format=jpg&name=large

You don't want to see Josh Anderson's card in comparison

Mangiapane is immensely more useful than Anderson, is younger and has a better contract
mv21227 a aimé ceci.
2 déc. 2022 à 21 h 45
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 2,671
Mentions "j'aime": 1,027
Quoting: mv21227
He may get traded for a 1st+, but he’s not close to being better than Mangiapane. Please explain what makes Anderson better


Quoting: Xspyrit
This is a revenge joke right? Mangiapane scored 35 goals last season (27 at ES+SH), which is more than Anderson had points


FZNOE8SX0AA_znI?format=jpg&name=large

You don't want to see Josh Anderson's card in comparison

Mangiapane is immensely more useful than Anderson, is younger and has a better contract


Advanced stats are good for baseball, but it doesn't take into consideration any physical plays or attributes a player has. Pretty sure we could find bad players with good WAR.

Those stats don't show how physical or fast Josh Anderson is, or how many good hits or forechecks he does in a game. He's always first on the puck in a race.

Didn't you see the 2 breakaways he got yesterday against CGY? He's faster than any of their players. Markstrom was so scared he had to hit him. We know what happen after.

In that game, CGY showed how slow and soft they are. Even Sutter said Monahan had so much space on the first goal. And Monahan is a slow player.

Calgary would be a much better team with Anderson instead of Mangiapane.
2 déc. 2022 à 21 h 49
#22
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: LIRIK
Advanced stats are good for baseball, but it doesn't take into consideration any physical plays or attributes a player has. Pretty sure we could find bad players with good WAR.

Those stats don't show how physical or fast Josh Anderson is, or how many good hits or forechecks he does in a game. He's always first on the puck in a race.

Didn't you see the 2 breakaways he got yesterday against CGY? He's faster than any of their players. Markstrom was so scared he had to hit him. We know what happen after.

In that game, CGY showed how slow and soft they are. Even Sutter said Monahan had so much space on the first goal. And Monahan is a slow player.

Calgary would be a much better team with Anderson instead of Mangiapane.


You can be as physical and fast as you want, but if you can't be effective offensively or defensively, then you aren't a good player. Anderson doesn't produce. Getting paid 5.5 million to not produce is terrible. By your logic, Mikheyev is the best player in the league. He can beat McDavid in a footrace
3 déc. 2022 à 23 h 42
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,495
Mentions "j'aime": 3,718
Quoting: LIRIK
Advanced stats are good for baseball, but it doesn't take into consideration any physical plays or attributes a player has. Pretty sure we could find bad players with good WAR.

Those stats don't show how physical or fast Josh Anderson is, or how many good hits or forechecks he does in a game. He's always first on the puck in a race.

Didn't you see the 2 breakaways he got yesterday against CGY? He's faster than any of their players. Markstrom was so scared he had to hit him. We know what happen after.

In that game, CGY showed how slow and soft they are. Even Sutter said Monahan had so much space on the first goal. And Monahan is a slow player.

Calgary would be a much better team with Anderson instead of Mangiapane.



Yes advanced stats are going to be more telling for baseball since it's not continuous action involving many players in small spaces like hockey but disagree with the rest

- physical attributes should actually help a player to maintain or regain possession and in the end outshot and outchance the opposition

- you are not going to find a lot bad players with good WAR. Try to find 1 to begin

- I don't focus on WAR much. I look at EV Off and EV Def while looking at QoC (competition) and QoT (teammates). I might also look at special units depending on the context of my research

- Anderson is fast and physical which is great but he sucks at controlling the puck and passing the puck which makes him a bottom-6 forward and this has resulted in 3rd line numbers for pretty much all his career. People are saying he is just NOT WORTH the 5.5 AAV he has. Any GM giving valuable pieces for that contract is a dinosaur that should be nowhere near the management of a half a billion/billion business.


Remember this is what you said :

CGY would have to add a 1st for Anderson value and another 1st to dump Mangiapane.


Sorry but I doubt we could find ONE non-Habs fan to agree with this. This is VERY FAR from being realistic
4 déc. 2022 à 0 h 37
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 2,671
Mentions "j'aime": 1,027
Quoting: Xspyrit
Yes advanced stats are going to be more telling for baseball since it's not continuous action involving many players in small spaces like hockey but disagree with the rest

- physical attributes should actually help a player to maintain or regain possession and in the end outshot and outchance the opposition

- you are not going to find a lot bad players with good WAR. Try to find 1 to begin

- I don't focus on WAR much. I look at EV Off and EV Def while looking at QoC (competition) and QoT (teammates). I might also look at special units depending on the context of my research

- Anderson is fast and physical which is great but he sucks at controlling the puck and passing the puck which makes him a bottom-6 forward and this has resulted in 3rd line numbers for pretty much all his career. People are saying he is just NOT WORTH the 5.5 AAV he has. Any GM giving valuable pieces for that contract is a dinosaur that should be nowhere near the management of a half a billion/billion business.


Remember this is what you said :

CGY would have to add a 1st for Anderson value and another 1st to dump Mangiapane.


Sorry but I doubt we could find ONE non-Habs fan to agree with this. This is VERY FAR from being realistic


Lehkonen and Danault had a very good WAR while in MTL, but had 3rd line point production. I guess they qualify as bad players with good WAR?

MTL want a 1st for Anderson, and want nothing to do with Mangiapane. If they were to take a 5.8M player they don't really want, they're gonna ask for at least a 1st. Monahan's trade proved that. That's what i meant.
4 déc. 2022 à 18 h 49
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,495
Mentions "j'aime": 3,718
Modifié 4 déc. 2022 à 18 h 56
Quoting: LIRIK
Lehkonen and Danault had a very good WAR while in MTL, but had 3rd line point production. I guess they qualify as bad players with good WAR?

MTL want a 1st for Anderson, and want nothing to do with Mangiapane. If they were to take a 5.8M player they don't really want, they're gonna ask for at least a 1st. Monahan's trade proved that. That's what i meant.


Danault is one of the best 2-way centers in the league and has been for a while. He finished 7, 6, 6, 8 for the Selke in the last 4 years

His offense is a bit underrated. Look at his card, it reflects that

Only his special teams work and goal scoring ability brought his WAR down

E7ZvBzPXoAcxS51?format=jpg&name=large

ELITE defensively, good offensively and he does all that against Elite competition...

Lehkonen is another underrated forward, his offense improved over the years, his defense game was already elite.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FXkRDuRWIAETOD6?format=jpg&name=large

That being said, I'm not really sure what you are trying to say. Maybe you're just not very familiar with advanced stats


Quoting: LIRIK
MTL want a 1st for Anderson, and want nothing to do with Mangiapane. If they were to take a 5.8M player they don't really want, they're gonna ask for at least a 1st. Monahan's trade proved that. That's what i meant.


I have absolutely no idea what makes you think Mangiapane is some kind of cap dump like Monahan was... Again, he scored 35 goals last season while being a premium defensive forward

They'd be BAT**** crazy to not trade Anderson for Mangiapane. But don't worry, that'll never be on the table

Younger, better, more productive, much better defensively, LESS term too so less risky

AINEC

I didn't do it before but I'll show you Anderson card then... He is just not very good. The average hockey fan gets impressed by the skating ability and the physical presence but in the end, results matter :

FWM0YYFX0Ak9lSa?format=jpg&name=large
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage