SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Matthews to Canucks

Créé par: myboykole
Équipe: 2022-23 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 29 nov. 2022
Publié: 29 nov. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
TOR
  1. Horvat, Bo (2 750 000 $ retained)
  2. Hughes, Quinn
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (VAN)
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (VAN)
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (VAN)
Détails additionnels:
Is this even?
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de NYR
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2025
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2082 500 000 $80 088 167 $1 250 000 $1 232 500 $2 411 833 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
883 750 $883 750 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 260 000 $7 260 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
Who wins this deal?
Le graphique a été masqué

Options de sondage


29 nov. 2022 à 15 h 26
#1
Amirov Forever
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 6,556
Mentions "j'aime": 6,036
Yeah not even close. Matthews just won the Hart and is a 2 time Rocket Richard winner who continually gets better. He's about as untouchable as it gets in Toronto
Logan_Ollivier et Bandit a aimé ceci.
29 nov. 2022 à 15 h 32
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,731
Mentions "j'aime": 14,494
Decent offer, but I wouldn't do it with a gun to my head if I am toronto
Logan_Ollivier et Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
29 nov. 2022 à 15 h 32
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 204
Mentions "j'aime": 33
I would say its not close but trading Franchise stars is a funny thing because there is a critical maximum that any GM would be willing to offer. For example, Connor McDavid is probably worth like 30 first round picks at face value, but at some point (well before 30) any GM in the league would consider that trade irresponsible. So there has to be a compromise between "regular guy value" and "trade anything thats not nailed down.
Saskleaf a aimé ceci.
29 nov. 2022 à 15 h 33
#4
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Literally why
29 nov. 2022 à 15 h 37
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2022
Messages: 161
Mentions "j'aime": 63
swap horvat with petterson
29 nov. 2022 à 15 h 37
#6
Owly
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,559
Mentions "j'aime": 932
Quoting: Juiceman
Literally why


Because it makes you better. But it's not a move Vancouver should make and one TO wouldn't even answer the phone for
29 nov. 2022 à 15 h 38
#7
Owly
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,559
Mentions "j'aime": 932
Quoting: Bandit
swap horvat with petterson


And it's still no
29 nov. 2022 à 15 h 42
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 8,566
Mentions "j'aime": 3,319
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
Because it makes you better. But it's not a move Vancouver should make and one TO wouldn't even answer the phone for


As good as Matthews is, this trade would cripple the Canucks. So, even if they experience some improvement (like make the playoffs), it will be short-lived. Just look at that D-core. They will have no cap to sign upgrades, and no 1sts for 3 years so drafting and developing guys will be a challenge.
29 nov. 2022 à 15 h 44
#9
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
Because it makes you better. But it's not a move Vancouver should make and one TO wouldn't even answer the phone for


It absolutely decimates our defense further, and we lose our draft capital. Do you know what our weakness is? Defense and prospects. Do you know our strengths? Offense. Literally the most counterproductive move possible
GMBL a aimé ceci.
29 nov. 2022 à 16 h 3
#10
Go leafs go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 13,236
Mentions "j'aime": 9,188
Quoting: Nathaniel
Yeah not even close. Matthews just won the Hart and is a 2 time Rocket Richard winner who continually gets better. He's about as untouchable as it gets in Toronto


Value wise I think it’s actually pretty good. 3 firsts, a rental centre to replace this year and is 3rd league wide in goals, and a young top pairing defenseman. Only problem is, as you said, Matthews is untouchable. Also adding Hughes doesn’t make much sense as RD is a much bigger need than LD. So this is definitely a pass.

Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
Because it makes you better. But it's not a move Vancouver should make and one TO wouldn't even answer the phone for


Nah, Vancouver should pass here. This is a lose lose trade. They lose their best defenseman and a lot of futures for a guy that could leave in 2 years. Both teams say no to this trade.
GMBL a aimé ceci.
29 nov. 2022 à 16 h 7
#11
Owly
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,559
Mentions "j'aime": 932
Quoting: GMBL
As good as Matthews is, this trade would cripple the Canucks. So, even if they experience some improvement (like make the playoffs), it will be short-lived. Just look at that D-core. They will have no cap to sign upgrades, and no 1sts for 3 years so drafting and developing guys will be a challenge.


Like I said they shouldn't make that trade
29 nov. 2022 à 16 h 8
#12
Owly
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,559
Mentions "j'aime": 932
Quoting: Juiceman
It absolutely decimates our defense further, and we lose our draft capital. Do you know what our weakness is? Defense and prospects. Do you know our strengths? Offense. Literally the most counterproductive move possible


Did you miss where I said you shouldn't make the trade? You win it but your team still sucks
29 nov. 2022 à 16 h 15
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 8,566
Mentions "j'aime": 3,319
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
Like I said they shouldn't make that trade


You did say that but you also said that it would make them better which isn't a given, not even in the short-term.
29 nov. 2022 à 16 h 38
#14
Eastsidegorilla
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 54
Mentions "j'aime": 10
Matthews would still be the 2C
29 nov. 2022 à 16 h 44
#15
Owly
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,559
Mentions "j'aime": 932
Quoting: GMBL
You did say that but you also said that it would make them better which isn't a given, not even in the short-term.


Doesn't matter, getting Matthews makes you win this trade. They shouldn't do it though because they should have a full rebuild but they still win the trade.
29 nov. 2022 à 19 h 0
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,731
Mentions "j'aime": 14,494
Quoting: Eastside1996
Matthews would still be the 2C


awesome face
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Chargement de l'animation
Soumettre les modifications du sondage