Why would VAN do that trade? Why are we giving up a 1st for Soucy?

Lot of "mehhh" heading to Vancouver in that deal.

Chicago probably accepts
Vancouver declines
Doubt Soucy returns a 1st but I can see it

CHI declines.

Laf or KK will be part of that pkg., VK is nothing in this trade, Blais as well, where is the meat, all potatoes?

No they aren’t for the billionth time. No 34 year old with a term of 3 months gets that.

If it happens it’s going to resemble the Claude Giroux deal. Kravtsov is the Owen Tippett.

Also if you’re looking for “meat and potatoes” then come back in 24 hours

Thats turkey and stuffing, not quite the same.
Kravstov sucks, sorry he may be part of the deal but not the main one.
Last year the guy had in 78 games- 26-66= 92
That's gonna cost ya, either way I'm good: He shows up you give up assets, he doesn't, he cant hurt the metro. win/win

You don’t eat any mashed potatoes with your dry turkey? Oof. I’ll keep you in my prayers tomorrow.

You can say what you want about Kravtsov but you’re completely in denial of trade value. Like I said, there’s no reason he’s not in the same tier as Tippett was last season.

Also, key words “last year.” He’s not on that pace this season.

Yeah using your words: Kane had 30 more pts than Claude last year and the return will not be as good as Kane's. Although Giroux is great he doesn't have that 3x cup, 1x MVP status