Forums/Armchair-GM

Opportunity

Créé par: brady_t12
Date de création initiale: 23 nov. 2022
Publié: 23 nov. 2022
Équipe: 2022-23 Capitals de Washington
Transactions
1.
WSH
  1. Schaefer, Reid
  2. Choix de 2023 ronde en 1e (EDM)
EDM
  1. Orlov, Dmitry (2 550 000 $ retained)
2.
WSH
  1. Holl, Justin
  2. Choix de 2023 ronde en 3e (OTT)
  3. Choix de 2024 ronde en 1e (TOR)
TOR
  1. Jensen, Nick (1 250 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
With Rielly on LTIR, Leafs need defense help immediately. Dump Holl and get a top 4 RHD for extra cheap
3.
WSH
  1. Hörnqvist, Patric
  2. Choix de 2024 ronde en 3e (FLA)
Détails additionnels:
Florida also throws in either Denisenko or Serron Noel
FLA
  1. Sheary, Conor
Détails additionnels:
Florida dumps Hornqvist to get Duclair off LTIR and also adds a rental forward for cheap.
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
  • Dmitry Orlov: 2 550 000 $ (50%)
  • Nick Jensen: 1 250 000 $ (50%)
ANNÉE DE REPÊCHAGE1E RONDE2E RONDE3E RONDE4E RONDE5E RONDE6E RONDE7E RONDE
2023
Logo de WSH
Logo de EDM
Logo de WSH
Logo de OTT
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
2024
Logo de WSH
Logo de TOR
Logo de WSH
Logo de FLA
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
2025
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $78 623 334 $100 000 $82 500 $3 876 666 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Capitals de Washington
Ovechkin, Alex
9 500 000 $
AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
Kuznetsov, Evgeny
7 800 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
Protas, Aliaksei
789 167 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
Milano, Sonny
750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
Strome, Dylan
3 500 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
Mantha, Anthony
5 700 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
Johansson, Marcus
1 100 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
Eller, Lars
3 500 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
Oshie, T.J.
5 750 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
Hathaway, Garnet
1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
Dowd, Nic
1 300 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
Hörnqvist, Patric
5 300 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Capitals de Washington
Gustafsson, Erik
800 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
Carlson, John
8 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
Kuemper, Darcy
5 250 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Capitals de Washington
Fehérváry, Martin
791 667 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
van Riemsdyk, Trevor
950 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
Lindgren, Charlie
1 100 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
Alexeyev, Alexander
863 333 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
Holl, Justin
2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Capitals de Washington
Aubé-Kubel, Nicolas
1 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
Wilson, Tom
5 166 667 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
Bäckström, Nicklas
9 200 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
Snively, Joe
800 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
Malenstyn, Beck
762 500 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
Brown, Connor
3 600 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
Irwin, Matt
750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
Hagelin, Carl
2 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 nov. 2022 à 1 h 27
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 1,424
Mentions "j'aime": 425
Lol no one is paying a 1st and a 3rd for a rental. Any team that even remotely thought about it will look back at Florida's mistake.

Not to mention it's been a down year for him. Doesn't look as good.

*I can't stress how bad this is. To pay a 1st and a 3rd for a rental 4th dman is wild.
23 nov. 2022 à 5 h 21
#2
812
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 13,212
Mentions "j'aime": 8,829
Quoting: TooMalevolent
Lol no one is paying a 1st and a 3rd for a rental. Any team that even remotely thought about it will look back at Florida's mistake.

Not to mention it's been a down year for him. Doesn't look as good.

*I can't stress how bad this is. To pay a 1st and a 3rd for a rental 4th dman is wild.

This is jensens best year. What are you talking about
NoVaSpartan et brady_t12 a aimé ceci.
23 nov. 2022 à 5 h 52
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 1,941
Mentions "j'aime": 411
Quoting: capsfan2121
This is jensens best year. What are you talking about


I disagreed with the other guy about the price for a rental D man, but it's much too steep of a price for a player that really isn't too much better than Holl himself, that's the reason why I believe this trade wouldn't happen, I see it more as Holl, a second and a prospect like Kral.
capsfan2121 a aimé ceci.
23 nov. 2022 à 8 h 43
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 6,146
Mentions "j'aime": 2,256
If Caps are still healthy struggling in January I'm all for this.
23 nov. 2022 à 8 h 43
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 6,146
Mentions "j'aime": 2,256
Quoting: TheOtherAuston
I disagreed with the other guy about the price for a rental D man, but it's much too steep of a price for a player that really isn't too much better than Holl himself, that's the reason why I believe this trade wouldn't happen, I see it more as Holl, a second and a prospect like Kral.


LOL what? Jensen is a top pair defensive defensemen, think he's 7th in xGAR among all defensemen the last 3 years. Holl is a bottom pairing guy. They aren't even close.
NoVaSpartan, brady_t12 et MVC a aimé ceci.
23 nov. 2022 à 8 h 52
#6
Nic Dowd Enjoyer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 3,681
Mentions "j'aime": 4,533
If Washington was to look at that Florida deal, I think they should look to get Gerasimyuk off of Florida instead of Noel or Denisenko. I think he could easily become the best goalie in the Caps system, I see him having much better upside than Gibson or Stevenson, and I think Florida could be persuaded with Knight already being their goalie of the future.

I can't see Edmonton moving their 1st round pick from last year, I think it would have to be a different prospect for the Oilers to consider.

Toronto trade is fine value for a Top 4 defenseman at $1.25 mil.
capsfan2121 et brady_t12 a aimé ceci.
23 nov. 2022 à 8 h 54
#7
Leafs Sufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 3,212
Mentions "j'aime": 2,545
Why would TOR include a defenseman in a trade when their d-core is dropping like flies? They need to be adding right now without subtracting from the roster.

Assuming you added a 3rd to "take Holl", remove it and Holl and the deal is fine.
brady_t12 a aimé ceci.
23 nov. 2022 à 9 h 47
#8
Démarrer sujet
Fantasy Hockey Pro
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,558
Mentions "j'aime": 777
Quoting: Ritzy
Why would TOR include a defenseman in a trade when their d-core is dropping like flies? They need to be adding right now without subtracting from the roster.

Assuming you added a 3rd to "take Holl", remove it and Holl and the deal is fine.


That's fair. I looked at it as dumping Holl, but I guess considering Muzzin is on LTIR for god knows how long, they really don't need to dump the 2M. Jensen at 50% retained for a first would be fair.
23 nov. 2022 à 9 h 50
#9
Démarrer sujet
Fantasy Hockey Pro
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,558
Mentions "j'aime": 777
Quoting: TooMalevolent
Lol no one is paying a 1st and a 3rd for a rental. Any team that even remotely thought about it will look back at Florida's mistake.

Not to mention it's been a down year for him. Doesn't look as good.

*I can't stress how bad this is. To pay a 1st and a 3rd for a rental 4th dman is wild.


First of all, Jensen would probably be the best defenseman on the Leafs aside from Rielly, who just landed on LTIR. Secondly, it's a first for Jensen at 50% retained, and a third to dump Holl, which you could argue Toronto doesn't actually need to do right now. So drop Holl and the third from the trade, and I'd be happy doing Jensen at 50% for a first round pick.

Also, you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about saying this is a down year for Jensen.
23 nov. 2022 à 10 h 14
#10
Leafs Sufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 3,212
Mentions "j'aime": 2,545
Quoting: brady_t12
That's fair. I looked at it as dumping Holl, but I guess considering Muzzin is on LTIR for god knows how long, they really don't need to dump the 2M. Jensen at 50% retained for a first would be fair.


Precisely, there is plenty of money for TOR to spend that doesn't involve sending a contract back. At this point in time, I don't even think they need the retention on Jensen. But that could change.

Let's call it a day 2024 first for Jensen at 50%. The debate on his value without retention isn't entirely necessary.
23 nov. 2022 à 10 h 27
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 1,424
Mentions "j'aime": 425
Quoting: brady_t12
First of all, Jensen would probably be the best defenseman on the Leafs aside from Rielly, who just landed on LTIR. Secondly, it's a first for Jensen at 50% retained, and a third to dump Holl, which you could argue Toronto doesn't actually need to do right now. So drop Holl and the third from the trade, and I'd be happy doing Jensen at 50% for a first round pick.

Also, you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about saying this is a down year for Jensen.


Anyone that thinks Rielly is the Leafs best dman has not watched the Leafs. Brodie-Jenson would be a fine pair to throw down in a shut down role, but dmen as expiring players never get 1st Rd picks as a return. And the 50% retained doesn't mean anything. That's a 4th Rd pick. There's an established market for how much retention costs. Jensen is worth a 2nd, 4th and B prospect.

*Again, besides Florida who regrets the trade.
23 nov. 2022 à 10 h 35
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 1,424
Mentions "j'aime": 425
Quoting: capsfan2121
This is jensens best year. What are you talking about


Doesn't look like it, but I don't watch them all the time and they have had injuries. From what I have seen, it's down from strong previous years.
23 nov. 2022 à 10 h 39
#13
we miss leo k
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 4,734
Mentions "j'aime": 3,882
Quoting: TooMalevolent
Anyone that thinks Rielly is the Leafs best dman has not watched the Leafs. Brodie-Jenson would be a fine pair to throw down in a shut down role, but dmen as expiring players never get 1st Rd picks as a return. And the 50% retained doesn't mean anything. That's a 4th Rd pick. There's an established market for how much retention costs. Jensen is worth a 2nd, 4th and B prospect.

*Again, besides Florida who regrets the trade.


-Hampus Lindholm for 1st/2nd/2nd+
-Ben Chiarot for a 1st/4th+
-Rasmus Ristolainen for a 1st+
-David Savard for a 1st/3rd+

All trades down in the past 2 years where a defenseman in the last year of his contract got traded for *at least* a 1st, sounds like we could talk about what the established market might actually be. Jensen fully retained would be cheaper than all of them (Savard was only cheaper because of double retention) and he's been the Caps best defender this year, by far. Not saying it's a slam dunk that he gets a 1st, but betting that strongly against it with multiple recent examples that the Caps can point to as comps is not a bet I'd want to put money behind.
TooMalevolent et brady_t12 a aimé ceci.
23 nov. 2022 à 10 h 56
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 1,424
Mentions "j'aime": 425
Quoting: dannibalcorpse
-Hampus Lindholm for 1st/2nd/2nd+
-Ben Chiarot for a 1st/4th+
-Rasmus Ristolainen for a 1st+
-David Savard for a 1st/3rd+

All trades down in the past 2 years where a defenseman in the last year of his contract got traded for *at least* a 1st, sounds like we could talk about what the established market might actually be. Jensen fully retained would be cheaper than all of them (Savard was only cheaper because of double retention) and he's been the Caps best defender this year, by far. Not saying it's a slam dunk that he gets a 1st, but betting that strongly against it with multiple recent examples that the Caps can point to as comps is not a bet I'd want to put money behind.


All massive overpays. Even Savard was one, but I think that one is the best example of how this Jenson trade could work. Jensen is better, so I conceited that. It's a good example. Lindholm is with an extension. That was worked into the trade, not the same thing. But fair point on Savard.
23 nov. 2022 à 11 h 33
#15
Démarrer sujet
Fantasy Hockey Pro
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,558
Mentions "j'aime": 777
Quoting: TooMalevolent
All massive overpays. Even Savard was one, but I think that one is the best example of how this Jenson trade could work. Jensen is better, so I conceited that. It's a good example. Lindholm is with an extension. That was worked into the trade, not the same thing. But fair point on Savard.


Regardless of whether or not they're overpays, your statement that "dmen as expiring players never get 1st Rd picks as a return" is wrong. If the leafs don't want Jensen, someone else will and they will pay at least a first round pick. He's gotten better every year he's been with the Caps. The leafs can bounce in the first round again if they want to rely on half a defensive core and do nothing about it at the trade deadline.
23 nov. 2022 à 13 h 19
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 1,424
Mentions "j'aime": 425
Quoting: brady_t12
Regardless of whether or not they're overpays, your statement that "dmen as expiring players never get 1st Rd picks as a return" is wrong. If the leafs don't want Jensen, someone else will and they will pay at least a first round pick. He's gotten better every year he's been with the Caps. The leafs can bounce in the first round again if they want to rely on half a defensive core and do nothing about it at the trade deadline.


Not getting Jenson is not the equivalent of a team doing nothing with their team. Caps not the only team in the league. Maybe relax a bit bud. Are you Jenson's agent?

Again I don't think anyone pays a 1st, but I can easily be wrong. I just read Klingberg as a rental might be a 1st+. That's insane. But if that's the market, then yeah Jensen at a 1st is fair. Rather have him. I just think it's more in line with the Manson trade last year. We'll see how it goes.
23 nov. 2022 à 15 h 33
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 1,941
Mentions "j'aime": 411
Quoting: brady_t12
First of all, Jensen would probably be the best defenseman on the Leafs aside from Rielly, who just landed on LTIR. Secondly, it's a first for Jensen at 50% retained, and a third to dump Holl, which you could argue Toronto doesn't actually need to do right now. So drop Holl and the third from the trade, and I'd be happy doing Jensen at 50% for a first round pick.

Also, you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about saying this is a down year for Jensen.


Maybe third best behind Rielly and Brodie
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage