SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Sad to see

Créé par: Prime_Jimbo
Équipe: 2022-23 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 23 nov. 2022
Publié: 23 nov. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
The captain dawns Edmonton orange in a push for the cup. OEL agrees to wave his NMC to join an absolute powerhouse with the likes of McDavid, Drai, Kane, Nuge, Bo and Hyman. Garland and Schenn also join a team playing quite well who ups the ante to win now.

The Canucks are now sellers and will continue into next year with Myers, Barrie and Pearson as leading trade candidates on expiring deals.
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Barrie, Tyson
  2. Foegele, Warren
  3. Puljujärvi, Jesse
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
EDM
  1. Ekman-Larsson, Oliver
  2. Horvat, Bo (2 750 000 $ retained)
2.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de EDM
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de NYR
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2025
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $74 583 750 $1 250 000 $2 632 500 $7 916 250 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
883 750 $883 750 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
900 000 $900 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 nov. 2022 à 1 h 7
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,052
Mentions "j'aime": 9,325
I highly doubt OEL waives his NMC. And even if he did we shouldn’t lower Horvat’s return by including him
23 nov. 2022 à 1 h 7
#2
Vancouerrific
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 3,214
Mentions "j'aime": 1,052
Garbage value for Bo

vomit-fat.gif
audiodave a aimé ceci.
23 nov. 2022 à 1 h 14
#3
Démarrer sujet
VAN
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 6,144
Mentions "j'aime": 1,878
Quoting: mv21227
I highly doubt OEL waives his NMC. And even if he did we shouldn’t lower Horvat’s return by including him


Why not? If the Canucks have the opportunity to move OEl, they'd be foolish not to. The Canucks take back an almost identical cap hit in Foegele and Barrie with much shorter term. While still obtaining a couple solid pieces in return seeing Bo move the other way. If Bo is moved, it will be a significant blow to the team and moving out a player like OEL expedites any attempt at a quick rebuild. Getting assets for Bo while straddled with 5 years of OEL (who doesn't have a role on the PP) will be even worse IMO.
23 nov. 2022 à 1 h 22
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,052
Mentions "j'aime": 9,325
Quoting: Prime_Jimbo
Why not? If the Canucks have the opportunity to move OEl, they'd be foolish not to. The Canucks take back an almost identical cap hit in Foegele and Barrie with much shorter term. While still obtaining a couple solid pieces in return seeing Bo move the other way. If Bo is moved, it will be a significant blow to the team and moving out a player like OEL expedites any attempt at a quick rebuild. Getting assets for Bo while straddled with 5 years of OEL (who doesn't have a role on the PP) will be even worse IMO.


I personally think it would be better to get as good of a return as possible for Horvat, and worse case scenario buy out OEL in a couple seasons.

OEL’s advanced stats have actually been quite good since the trade, he’s still a quality 2nd pair dman, just a bad contract https://twitter.com/harshbirbrar03/status/1594739480321302530?s=46&t=BmVoowWR8AAckRI4kulYYA
Prime_Jimbo a aimé ceci.
23 nov. 2022 à 1 h 30
#5
Démarrer sujet
VAN
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 6,144
Mentions "j'aime": 1,878
Quoting: mv21227
I personally think it would be better to get as good of a return as possible for Horvat, and worse case scenario buy out OEL in a couple seasons.

OEL’s advanced stats have actually been quite good since the trade, he’s still a quality 2nd pair dman, just a bad contract https://twitter.com/harshbirbrar03/status/1594739480321302530?s=46&t=BmVoowWR8AAckRI4kulYYA


Thanks for sharing. The defense is terrible though. He's not a good fit in the team. His metrics might be solid but he's almost unoticable out there. That's fine for 1-2m dman but not 7m. And if his metrics are holding up, better chance to move him now than never being able to (not that it's likely anyway).
23 nov. 2022 à 1 h 37
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 3,205
Mentions "j'aime": 1,077
Quoting: mv21227
I personally think it would be better to get as good of a return as possible for Horvat, and worse case scenario buy out OEL in a couple seasons.

OEL’s advanced stats have actually been quite good since the trade, he’s still a quality 2nd pair dman, just a bad contract https://twitter.com/harshbirbrar03/status/1594739480321302530?s=46&t=BmVoowWR8AAckRI4kulYYA


Quoting: Prime_Jimbo
Thanks for sharing. The defense is terrible though. He's not a good fit in the team. His metrics might be solid but he's almost unoticable out there. That's fine for 1-2m dman but not 7m. And if his metrics are holding up, better chance to move him now than never being able to (not that it's likely anyway).


I think OEL can still be really good, but he needs a good partner. Finding one for him and Hughes has been difficult.
23 nov. 2022 à 1 h 56
#7
Démarrer sujet
VAN
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 6,144
Mentions "j'aime": 1,878
Quoting: Canucks33
I think OEL can still be really good, but he needs a good partner. Finding one for him and Hughes has been difficult.


I think if you pay a player that much, they should elevate their peers game. Players like Petey and Hughes are elevating their linemates/pairing (Schenn).

https://twitter.com/JFreshHockey/status/1595166964799967255?t=oOT4YsVPEXRsZ_hls7aTbQ&s=19
23 nov. 2022 à 2 h 6
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 1,623
Mentions "j'aime": 1,228
Quoting: WhereArtTLuongo
Garbage value for Bo

vomit-fat.gif


That made me laugh, thanks!
WhereArtTLuongo a aimé ceci.
23 nov. 2022 à 2 h 59
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 3,205
Mentions "j'aime": 1,077
Quoting: Prime_Jimbo
I think if you pay a player that much, they should elevate their peers game. Players like Petey and Hughes are elevating their linemates/pairing (Schenn).

https://twitter.com/JFreshHockey/status/1595166964799967255?t=oOT4YsVPEXRsZ_hls7aTbQ&s=19


Ideally sure, but you're no team is entirely perfect. The Avalanche won the cup with a 3RD at 6M. The Lightning won back to back championships with guys like Schenn, Bogosian, Rutta and Shattenkirk at RD. OEL is still good enough to help the team win IF he get's a good partner.
MisstheWhalers a aimé ceci.
23 nov. 2022 à 6 h 42
#10
Future Norris guy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 15,569
Mentions "j'aime": 8,609
laugh laugh Talk about a garbage offer for Bo Horvat at 50% retained.

There's no way OEL is waiving for Edmonton, He basically said it's Boston and Vancouver only.

2 cap dumps in Barrie and Foegele and Puljujari = 3rd round pick at best. Talk about a pathetic offer for Bo. Dude you're lowering Bo's value just by attaching Ekman-Larsson to him. No reason to make this offer.
23 nov. 2022 à 10 h 21
#11
Démarrer sujet
VAN
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 6,144
Mentions "j'aime": 1,878
Quoting: HockeyIsMyPassion61
laugh laugh Talk about a garbage offer for Bo Horvat at 50% retained.

There's no way OEL is waiving for Edmonton, He basically said it's Boston and Vancouver only.

2 cap dumps in Barrie and Foegele and Puljujari = 3rd round pick at best. Talk about a pathetic offer for Bo. Dude you're lowering Bo's value just by attaching Ekman-Larsson to him. No reason to make this offer.


Things change and OEL could have different feelings about the org now.

I'm well aware that OEL would have a negative impact on Bo's return but freeing up OELs money for better use is definitely a positive.
MisstheWhalers a aimé ceci.
23 nov. 2022 à 10 h 25
#12
Démarrer sujet
VAN
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 6,144
Mentions "j'aime": 1,878
Quoting: Canucks33
Ideally sure, but you're no team is entirely perfect. The Avalanche won the cup with a 3RD at 6M. The Lightning won back to back championships with guys like Schenn, Bogosian, Rutta and Shattenkirk at RD. OEL is still good enough to help the team win IF he get's a good partner.


Those guys were on minimal cost contracts making their contribution. OEL at 7m+, the expectation should be game changer. Bear is playing solid but OEL hasn't suddenly flourished.

Colorado also has multiple players outplaying their aav, arguably one of the best centers and dmen (who was on ELC when they won the cup) in the league as well. These guys are making bigger impacts than any player on the Canucks.
23 nov. 2022 à 20 h 46
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 3,205
Mentions "j'aime": 1,077
Quoting: Prime_Jimbo
Those guys were on minimal cost contracts making their contribution. OEL at 7m+, the expectation should be game changer. Bear is playing solid but OEL hasn't suddenly flourished.

Colorado also has multiple players outplaying their aav, arguably one of the best centers and dmen (who was on ELC when they won the cup) in the league as well. These guys are making bigger impacts than any player on the Canucks.


Did you read my post?

Johnson was on the 3rd pair at 6M and is absolutely not a game changer. Makar's cap hit was 9M last year. The fact that Schenn, Ruuta, Bogosian and Shattenkirk were getting regular playing time at all was a weakness for Tampa.

Bear has been good but that doesn't mean he's a good partner for OEL, at least not yet.

The point is every single team in the league has weaknesses both in their cap allocation and their lineup, you just have to be strong enough to overcome them. Right now the Canucks defense (in terms of both the players and structure) is a glaring weakness that they can't overcome. There's no excuse for that given how well Pettersson and Horvat are playing.
Prime_Jimbo a aimé ceci.
23 nov. 2022 à 23 h 38
#14
Démarrer sujet
VAN
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 6,144
Mentions "j'aime": 1,878
Quoting: Canucks33
Did you read my post?

Johnson was on the 3rd pair at 6M and is absolutely not a game changer. Makar's cap hit was 9M last year. The fact that Schenn, Ruuta, Bogosian and Shattenkirk were getting regular playing time at all was a weakness for Tampa.

Bear has been good but that doesn't mean he's a good partner for OEL, at least not yet.

The point is every single team in the league has weaknesses both in their cap allocation and their lineup, you just have to be strong enough to overcome them. Right now the Canucks defense (in terms of both the players and structure) is a glaring weakness that they can't overcome. There's no excuse for that given how well Pettersson and Horvat are playing.


Ya you're right about Makar.

We'll disagree about OEL. He struggles against speed, getting the pick out of his zone, he's not used on PP and that's money down the drain and will continue to be. I think all of those players you listed are more impactful defensively besides Shattenkirk and have fallen off since besides Schenn. Definitely more physical. OELs fit is off. Myers is a bad fit too and money tied up sucks.

The TB and Avs forward group is still much better despite Petey and Bo's efforts. Their play style is significantly more impactful with speed and pressure.
24 nov. 2022 à 0 h 4
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 3,205
Mentions "j'aime": 1,077
Quoting: Prime_Jimbo
Ya you're right about Makar.

We'll disagree about OEL. He struggles against speed, getting the pick out of his zone, he's not used on PP and that's money down the drain and will continue to be. I think all of those players you listed are more impactful defensively besides Shattenkirk and have fallen off since besides Schenn. Definitely more physical. OELs fit is off. Myers is a bad fit too and money tied up sucks.

The TB and Avs forward group is still much better despite Petey and Bo's efforts. Their play style is significantly more impactful with speed and pressure.


The bolded is a systems thing and exactly what Rutherford is talking about. When you have inefficiencies within your cap and your lineup, you can overcome that with strong team structure. That's what Rutherford was talking about with injuries on HNIC After Hours. OEL would look a lot better on Tampa or Colorado because the of the way they play as a team. All those things you pointed out that OEL struggles with are true, but they were also true for those Tampa defensemen. Tampa was able to overcome that. That's the level that Rutherford wants the Canucks to get to, but it's a slow, methodical process.

Specifically on Tampa, Lalonde's Spittin Chiclets interview was interesting. He mentioned that after getting swept by CBJ the coaching staff worked to completely eliminate risk from their game. The players bought in and it worked. However, there was an instance where Lalonde and the other assistants were irate with Kucherov for his puck management. Lalonde went as far as contemplating having Kucherov moved. But Cooper met with Kucherov one day and completely settled him down and his commitment to playing within the team's system didn't waver after that. Think about how long Cooper andKucherov have been in Tampa and how much they've gone through to get to that point where it finally clicked at the perfect time. All that to say that however Rutherford is going to build the team, it's going to take a long time and there are no quick fixes.
Prime_Jimbo a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage