SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Reversing Bennings Biggest Blunders

Créé par: audiodave
Équipe: 2022-23 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 6 nov. 2022
Publié: 20 nov. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
What the Canucks could look like had Benning not made a bunch of bad moves.
Transactions
1.
2.
3.
4.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de NYR
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2025
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $63 994 584 $1 250 000 $3 682 500 $18 505 416 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
883 750 $883 750 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
750 000 $750 000 $ (Bonis de performance750 000 $$750K)
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
20 nov. 2022 à 22 h 20
#1
yotes own canada
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 2,101
Mentions "j'aime": 746
funny thing is all of these moves were frowned upon except maybe the myers signing so there really isnt "hindsight is 2020"
20 nov. 2022 à 22 h 29
#2
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,072
Mentions "j'aime": 22,466
Don't think can include Tanev and Elder in the conversation as they were UFAs. It just might be the in my opinion the untraceable 8m X 7 extension was a mistake.
20 nov. 2022 à 22 h 34
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 1,620
Mentions "j'aime": 1,228
Quoting: palhal
Don't think can include Tanev and Elder in the conversation as they were UFAs. It just might be the in my opinion the untraceable 8m X 7 extension was a mistake.


Letting them walk when both would have signed extensions was the mistake.
20 nov. 2022 à 22 h 35
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 1,620
Mentions "j'aime": 1,228
Quoting: dickie_boon
funny thing is all of these moves were frowned upon except maybe the myers signing so there really isnt "hindsight is 2020"


Who said anything about hindsight?
20 nov. 2022 à 22 h 36
#5
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,072
Mentions "j'aime": 22,466
Quoting: audiodave
Letting them walk when both would have signed extensions was the mistake.


Sorry, "letting them walk" just isn't true. Players have the option of wanting to remain or not, not just the teams.
20 nov. 2022 à 22 h 41
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 1,620
Mentions "j'aime": 1,228
Quoting: palhal
Sorry, "letting them walk" just isn't true. Players have the option of wanting to remain or not, not just the teams.


Both were willing to sign extensions to stay Canucks, but Benning didn't make them offers.
20 nov. 2022 à 22 h 42
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 10,170
Mentions "j'aime": 7,852
Just talking about the OEL trade. I wonder if LA would have traded down one spot for the #9 pick and the second rounder that went to Arizona.
audiodave a aimé ceci.
20 nov. 2022 à 22 h 48
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 1,620
Mentions "j'aime": 1,228
Quoting: Lancebmx
Just talking about the OEL trade. I wonder if LA would have traded down one spot for the #9 pick and the second rounder that went to Arizona.


If they had it would be awesome. Clarke looks like he is going to be a great defenseman.
20 nov. 2022 à 22 h 49
#9
The Canucks Suck
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 456
Mentions "j'aime": 109
Jared McCann?
20 nov. 2022 à 22 h 52
#10
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: palhal
Sorry, "letting them walk" just isn't true. Players have the option of wanting to remain or not, not just the teams.


For Chris Tanev, he was waiting for call but Benning never gave him one. We could have signed him. Benning went for OEL instead...
audiodave a aimé ceci.
20 nov. 2022 à 22 h 53
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2016
Messages: 1,620
Mentions "j'aime": 1,228
Quoting: SamTheGoalie36
Jared McCann?


Drafting him or trading him?
20 nov. 2022 à 22 h 57
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 10,170
Mentions "j'aime": 7,852
Quoting: audiodave
If they had it would be awesome. Clarke looks like he is going to be a great defenseman.


It might have been doable. The only equivalent trade I've found in recent memory is the Luke Schenn one where Toronto moved up two spots to draft Schenn at #5.
audiodave a aimé ceci.
20 nov. 2022 à 22 h 58
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 10,170
Mentions "j'aime": 7,852
Quoting: Juiceman
For Chris Tanev, he was waiting for call but Benning never gave him one. We could have signed him. Benning went for OEL instead...


That's really too bad. He was a staple for that defence for years.
audiodave et Juiceman a aimé ceci.
20 nov. 2022 à 23 h 2
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 434
Mentions "j'aime": 201
Don’t forget toffoli!
audiodave a aimé ceci.
21 nov. 2022 à 1 h 11
#15
The Canucks Suck
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 456
Mentions "j'aime": 109
Quoting: audiodave
Drafting him or trading him?


Trading him and dont forget Juolevi
audiodave a aimé ceci.
21 nov. 2022 à 1 h 34
#16
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: audiodave
Drafting him or trading him?


2014 Canucks drafted a lot of good players. Jared McCann, Thatcher Demko, Gustav Forsling. Too bad Benning shipped 2 of them out before they had a chance to prove themselves
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage