SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Fauteuil - DG

Line is so fine

Créé par: BuckRogers
Équipe: 2022-23 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 11 nov. 2022
Publié: 11 nov. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
ANA
  1. Hamonic, Travis
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (OTT)
Détails additionnels:
Conditions:
2023 Top 10 protected carry 2024 with compensation Washington 2 round pick 2024.
If Kleinberg does not sign with Sens then 2024 first round pick will apply.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de NSH
2024
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de WSH
Logo de OTT
Logo de TBL
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2182 500 000 $77 931 548 $0 $4 450 000 $4 568 452 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 205 714 $8 205 714 $
AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 975 000 $4 975 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
762 500 $762 500 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
821 667 $821 667 $
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
950 000 $950 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 666 667 $3 666 667 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
900 000 $900 000 $
DG/DD, AG
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
7 950 000 $7 950 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 nov. 2022 à 19 h 4
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 4,361
Mentions "j'aime": 2,231
Why in the WORLD would OTT do that???
MisstheWhalers a aimé ceci.
11 nov. 2022 à 19 h 4
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 4,361
Mentions "j'aime": 2,231
You also can't have signing contingencies in contracts anymore.
MisstheWhalers a aimé ceci.
11 nov. 2022 à 19 h 6
#3
Future Norris guy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 15,605
Mentions "j'aime": 8,623
Quoting: NJDevils1317
Why in the WORLD would OTT do that???


Why would Anaheim do that? Hamonic is garbage compared to Klingberg.
11 nov. 2022 à 19 h 7
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 4,361
Mentions "j'aime": 2,231
Quoting: HockeyIsMyPassion61
Why would Anaheim do that? Hamonic is garbage compared to Klingberg.


For a 2024 1st unprotected for what could be a complete garbage team that likely won't get better??
MisstheWhalers a aimé ceci.
11 nov. 2022 à 19 h 11
#5
Future Norris guy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 15,605
Mentions "j'aime": 8,623
The new CBA forbids signing contingencies.
11 nov. 2022 à 19 h 11
#6
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,501
Mentions "j'aime": 22,667
Sens are going to be out of the playoffs, no way they trade futures for an upcoming UFA.
NJDevils1317 a aimé ceci.
11 nov. 2022 à 19 h 14
#7
gavinray
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 2,167
Mentions "j'aime": 561
Make it a 2024 second and it makes sense otherwise a crazy amount to give up
11 nov. 2022 à 19 h 27
#8
NoQuitInNewYork
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 2,124
Mentions "j'aime": 743
Why would Anaheim do this. Hamonic has 3 points in 13 games. He has 17 hits and damn 14 penalty minutes. He does however have +4 in +/-. Klingberg so far has 7 points in 14 games played. He’s on pace for 42 points. Klingberg is also an expiring UFA and the first is top 10 protected.
11 nov. 2022 à 19 h 45
#9
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 9,794
Mentions "j'aime": 6,565
Quoting: Scooter81
Why would Anaheim do this. Hamonic has 3 points in 13 games. He has 17 hits and damn 14 penalty minutes. He does however have +4 in +/-. Klingberg so far has 7 points in 14 games played. He’s on pace for 42 points. Klingberg is also an expiring UFA and the first is top 10 protected.


Because we are going to be sellers at the TDL, its not that unreasonable to have top 10 protection, since the 10 team NTC on klingberg is designed to prevent him from going somewhere that won't make the playoffs. Maybe i'd push it to top 8 protected, but its somewhat semantics, the idea is to send him somewhere where that protection on the pick will not kick in.

Also, why are you not asking for retention, that's one of the biggest selling points of Klingberg on Jan 2 is that Anaheim is willing to retain 50% of his salary in order to boost his value.

But yeah, deal looks about right, 2023 1st, warm body at RD coming back to fill the hole left, maybe a mid round pick or B prospect for the 3.5 million in retention.
11 nov. 2022 à 19 h 48
#10
NoQuitInNewYork
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 2,124
Mentions "j'aime": 743
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Because we are going to be sellers at the TDL, its not that unreasonable to have top 10 protection, since the 10 team NTC on klingberg is designed to prevent him from going somewhere that won't make the playoffs. Maybe i'd push it to top 8 protected, but its somewhat semantics, the idea is to send him somewhere where that protection on the pick will not kick in.

Also, why are you not asking for retention, that's one of the biggest selling points of Klingberg on Jan 2 is that Anaheim is willing to retain 50% of his salary in order to boost his value.

But yeah, deal looks about right, 2023 1st, warm body at RD coming back to fill the hole left, maybe a mid round pick or B prospect for the 3.5 million in retention.


Valid point. I agree that it should be a top 8 protected and their should be some RS.
11 nov. 2022 à 19 h 57
#11
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,648
Mentions "j'aime": 12,370
Quoting: HockeyIsMyPassion61
Why would Anaheim do that? Hamonic is garbage compared to Klingberg.


To get a 1st round pick.
11 nov. 2022 à 19 h 58
#12
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,648
Mentions "j'aime": 12,370
Quoting: Scooter81
Why would Anaheim do this. Hamonic has 3 points in 13 games. He has 17 hits and damn 14 penalty minutes. He does however have +4 in +/-. Klingberg so far has 7 points in 14 games played. He’s on pace for 42 points. Klingberg is also an expiring UFA and the first is top 10 protected.


To get a 1st round pick.
11 nov. 2022 à 20 h 13
#13
Registered sicko
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2022
Messages: 20
Mentions "j'aime": 1
I'd do this as a rental late in the season, but I wouldn't intend on resigning him. We have too many contracts that will need to go out and not enough cap to keep them all. Debrincat, Sanderson, Pinto, JBD, Thompson, and Grieg will all need contracts over the next 3 years and we only have so much money. We don't wanna Leafs ourselves.
GiggywithGibby a aimé ceci.
12 nov. 2022 à 9 h 47
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 5,722
Mentions "j'aime": 1,488
OTT is going to in the Bedard sweepstakes no chance they trade a first this or next year for 1 year of a RD, they pass
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage