SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

A thought

Créé par: MNCountryClub
Équipe: 2022-23 Wild du Minnesota
Date de création initiale: 18 oct. 2022
Publié: 20 oct. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
For what it's worth, I think both teams pass. Just saw CGY was looking for a RW and wanted to throw some garbage at the wall.
Transactions
CGY
  1. Gustavsson, Filip
  2. Hartman, Ryan
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (MIN)
Détails additionnels:
Just a framework - not sure if more picks are needed to balance. CGY gets a RW for a favorable cap hit, MN stabilizes the net and locks out Goose from getting more ice time.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
2024
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
2025
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2282 500 000 $79 932 754 $0 $1 532 500 $2 567 246 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
880 833 $880 833 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
825 000 $825 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 450 000 $2 450 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
7 575 000 $7 575 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
795 000 $795 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
20 oct. 2022 à 10 h 33
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 203
Mentions "j'aime": 25
I worry about trading Hartman. I don't like him where he is playing now, but his Caphit is insane and we've got more Cap hell to go.
20 oct. 2022 à 10 h 39
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,656
Mentions "j'aime": 1,904
Quoting: BillytheKid
I worry about trading Hartman. I don't like him where he is playing now, but his Caphit is insane and we've got more Cap hell to go.


I don't think there's any chance he actually gets moved. I'm just not his biggest fan and wanted to toss this out there. But I'd imagine he's pretty safe.
20 oct. 2022 à 11 h 7
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 8,697
Mentions "j'aime": 7,071
If we are looking to trade Hartman, Calgary could be a good fit. Not sure how I feel about Kylington though, he's somewhat more of the same of what we have and we need somebody who is a lot better in their own zone. Tanev or Weegar are better targets IMO but I wouldn't love moving Hartman for either given his cap hit and the year he had last year.
20 oct. 2022 à 11 h 43
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 2,656
Mentions "j'aime": 1,904
Quoting: TanSor
If we are looking to trade Hartman, Calgary could be a good fit. Not sure how I feel about Kylington though, he's somewhat more of the same of what we have and we need somebody who is a lot better in their own zone. Tanev or Weegar are better targets IMO but I wouldn't love moving Hartman for either given his cap hit and the year he had last year.


Yeah I'd definitely prefer either of those, but Weegar just extended and Tanev has a full NTC, so I assumed both were unavailable.

I'm pretty lukewarm on the entire proposal to begin with. Just saw a trend in "CGY getting RW" posts and thought I'd try something around Hartman. I doubt Hartman is even available for anything less than a no-brainer return.
TanSor a aimé ceci.
20 oct. 2022 à 12 h 48
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,217
Mentions "j'aime": 19,489
Calgary is moving along just fine right now and are not at all interested in downgrading their goaltending. If you want Vladar it will be in the offseason.

Quoting: TanSor
If we are looking to trade Hartman, Calgary could be a good fit. Not sure how I feel about Kylington though, he's somewhat more of the same of what we have and we need somebody who is a lot better in their own zone. Tanev or Weegar are better targets IMO but I wouldn't love moving Hartman for either given his cap hit and the year he had last year.


I don't mind Hartman, especially at that cap hit. I think he's more suited for a center role than RW though and he's certainly not moving any of our current centers out. I do think he overperformed quite a bit last year though and will come back down to earth now. As for Weegar and Tanev, absolutely not available.
KingofRnR et TanSor a aimé ceci.
20 oct. 2022 à 15 h 0
#6
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 6,782
Mentions "j'aime": 1,831
Definitely an interesting idea and proposal!
20 oct. 2022 à 15 h 22
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 8,697
Mentions "j'aime": 7,071
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Calgary is moving along just fine right now and are not at all interested in downgrading their goaltending. If you want Vladar it will be in the offseason.



I don't mind Hartman, especially at that cap hit. I think he's more suited for a center role than RW though and he's certainly not moving any of our current centers out. I do think he overperformed quite a bit last year though and will come back down to earth now. As for Weegar and Tanev, absolutely not available.


Completely agree. What I was trying to say is that (assuming Hartman returns to form) we need a 1C a lot more than another good RD and given that, we shouldn't settle for anything other than those two if the Flames want Hartman.
20 oct. 2022 à 15 h 33
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,217
Mentions "j'aime": 19,489
Quoting: TanSor
Completely agree. What I was trying to say is that (assuming Hartman returns to form) we need a 1C a lot more than another good RD and given that, we shouldn't settle for anything other than those two if the Flames want Hartman.


I think Minny is actually fine on defensive depth with the breakout of Addison. I wonder if something like a Horvat for Dumba swap could benefit both teams
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage