SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Engvall odd man out

Créé par: RangerWall92
Équipe: 2022-23 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 11 oct. 2022
Publié: 11 oct. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
TOR
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (WPG)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de WPG
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2282 500 000 $82 467 913 $212 500 $0 $32 087 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
840 630 $840 630 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 oct. 2022 à 16 h 6
#1
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,074
Mentions "j'aime": 22,466
Even if Engvall is traded as you suggest, the Leafs still have to make cuts to accommodate 1.4m Liljegren.
11 oct. 2022 à 16 h 15
#2
Kster
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 1,278
Mentions "j'aime": 359
Quoting: palhal
Even if Engvall is traded as you suggest, the Leafs still have to make cuts to accommodate 1.4m Liljegren.


No they don’t. And I wouldn’t trade anyone yet (that 3rd line looks crispy), let’s see how things unfold.
11 oct. 2022 à 16 h 16
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,320
Mentions "j'aime": 4,115
Quoting: palhal
Even if Engvall is traded as you suggest, the Leafs still have to make cuts to accommodate 1.4m Liljegren.


Mete + Gaudette = 1.5m. Lily = 1.4m

They would send both those guys down (as they are down right now).
11 oct. 2022 à 16 h 36
#4
NoQuitInNewYork
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 2,124
Mentions "j'aime": 743
Still won’t work
11 oct. 2022 à 16 h 56
#5
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,074
Mentions "j'aime": 22,466
Quoting: TMLBRIAN
Mete + Gaudette = 1.5m. Lily = 1.4m

They would send both those guys down (as they are down right now).


You're right for a 21 man roster. Really long term term not practical.
11 oct. 2022 à 16 h 59
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,320
Mentions "j'aime": 4,115
Quoting: palhal
You're right for a 21 man roster. Really long term term not practical.


they are rocking a 20 man roster right now. I think they are happy running a smaller team if they can keep all their guys.
Logan_Ollivier a aimé ceci.
11 oct. 2022 à 17 h 1
#7
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,074
Mentions "j'aime": 22,466
Quoting: TMLBRIAN
they are rocking a 20 man roster right now. I think they are happy running a smaller team if they can keep all their guys.


The Leafs have mismanaged. the cap so bad....they can't keep all their guys, hence the 20 or 21 man roster.
11 oct. 2022 à 17 h 3
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,320
Mentions "j'aime": 4,115
Quoting: palhal
The Leafs have mismanaged. the cap so bad....they can't keep all their guys, hence the 20 or 21 man roster.


I think it was a conscious decision when they signed Jarnkrok that they would do a 20-21 man roster this year.
palhal et Logan_Ollivier a aimé ceci.
11 oct. 2022 à 17 h 22
#9
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,074
Mentions "j'aime": 22,466
Quoting: TMLBRIAN
I think it was a conscious decision when they signed Jarnkrok that they would do a 20-21 man roster this year.


More like a "unconscious" decision. But you are correct, for some reason they thought 2.1m Jarnkrok was better than having two players like Robertson, Steeves, Simmons, Gaudette on the team.
Jarnkrok for four years....yikes. His four assists in 17 games with the Flames I thought should have more of PTO than long term contract.
11 oct. 2022 à 17 h 25
#10
Ovchinnikov 137
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 10,412
Mentions "j'aime": 11,982
Quoting: palhal
The Leafs have mismanaged. the cap so bad....they can't keep all their guys, hence the 20 or 21 man roster.


17 of 32 NHL teams are running fewer than their allowed 23 men to start the season.

TB - 20 men, $0
BOS - 20 men, $0
FLA - 20 men, $0

Teams were already up against the ceiling before, it's only gotten worse since the pandemic happened and flattened the cap with only minimal raises until 2024.

But totally, this is just a Leaf issue
Logan_Ollivier a aimé ceci.
11 oct. 2022 à 17 h 28
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,320
Mentions "j'aime": 4,115
Quoting: palhal
More like a "unconscious" decision. But you are correct, for some reason they thought 2.1m Jarnkrok was better than having two players like Robertson, Steeves, Simmons, Gaudette on the team.
Jarnkrok for four years....yikes. His four assists in 17 games with the Flames I thought should have more of PTO than long term contract.


It was conscious. Keefe talked about it this week in interviews. He said "we knew as soon as we signed Jarnkrok that we would be running a short roster this year" (paraphrasing). Jarnkrok has been a steady player for years. 2.1m is fine. 4 years is a lot but the contract is by no means terrible.
Logan_Ollivier a aimé ceci.
11 oct. 2022 à 17 h 57
#12
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,074
Mentions "j'aime": 22,466
Quoting: MatthewsFan
17 of 32 NHL teams are running fewer than their allowed 23 men to start the season.

TB - 20 men, $0
BOS - 20 men, $0
FLA - 20 men, $0

Teams were already up against the ceiling before, it's only gotten worse since the pandemic happened and flattened the cap with only minimal raises until 2024.

But totally, this is just a Leaf issue


I'll disagree with your math. Tampa gets cap relief or "more cap" due to Seabrook on season ending LTIR. Also Bruins get cap relief as McAvoy is out for months. We'll see how many teams run just a 20 man active roster.
11 oct. 2022 à 18 h 7
#13
Ovchinnikov 137
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 10,412
Mentions "j'aime": 11,982
Quoting: palhal
I'll disagree with your math. Tampa gets cap relief or "more cap" due to Seabrook on season ending LTIR. Also Bruins get cap relief as McAvoy is out for months. We'll see how many teams run just a 20 man active roster.


🤦‍♂️ TBL/BOS all at 20/23 roster




But sure, this is just a Leaf issue lol
11 oct. 2022 à 18 h 30
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 932
Mentions "j'aime": 320
Quoting: MatthewsFan
🤦‍♂️ TBL/BOS all at 20/23 roster




But sure, this is just a Leaf issue lol


it is just a leafs issue... Boston and Tampa have both had longer playoff runs than the leafs, so, while they're up against the ceiling, it works.

Toronto, not so much.

Tampa currently has $3M of Cole still on their books, he may have his contract annulled freeing up room, to which, they'll likely call up a player or two (Myers and a forward)

The point is, a 20 man roster isn't ideal.... 2 guys get the flu and you're running an 18 man roster.... one goalie gets sick, and you're running without a backup.

And again, Boston has McAvoy on LTIR, so they can easily call up 1-2 people to fill in, there's no rush for them though, and Marchand coming back when he does puts them up to 21

Toronto doesn't have anyone on IR that is counting against the cap (Cirelli and Marchand), and eventually filling the roster spot.

So, yeah, it's a Leafs issue... as they will be the only team with a 20 man roster for the full season because of horrible cap management.
11 oct. 2022 à 18 h 58
#15
Ovchinnikov 137
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 10,412
Mentions "j'aime": 11,982
Quoting: KMMHL2012
it is just a leafs issue... Boston and Tampa have both had longer playoff runs than the leafs, so, while they're up against the ceiling, it works.

Toronto, not so much.

Tampa currently has $3M of Cole still on their books, he may have his contract annulled freeing up room, to which, they'll likely call up a player or two (Myers and a forward)

The point is, a 20 man roster isn't ideal.... 2 guys get the flu and you're running an 18 man roster.... one goalie gets sick, and you're running without a backup.

And again, Boston has McAvoy on LTIR, so they can easily call up 1-2 people to fill in, there's no rush for them though, and Marchand coming back when he does puts them up to 21

Toronto doesn't have anyone on IR that is counting against the cap (Cirelli and Marchand), and eventually filling the roster spot.

So, yeah, it's a Leafs issue... as they will be the only team with a 20 man roster for the full season because of horrible cap management.


Do yourself a favor and at least look at things before you type.

BOS currently has waived Mike Rielly (3,000,000), Nick Foligno (3,800,000) and Chris Wagner (1,350,000) in the minors (thats a little over 8mil in salary just sitting in the minors lol) I can only imagine what you'd be saying if Kyle Dubas had that much salary buried in the minors.

They just signed Stralman for 1 year a 1mil. So now once Marchard and McAvoy are healthy will still need to waive another player and have a 22 man roster.

And yes, TBL is taking advantage of having Seabrook on LTIR.


It is absolutely less than ideal to have 21 man roster (which the Leafs can have starting Thursday) and a roster decision will have to be made once Liljgren is healthy, but again, this is not just a Leafs issue. lol
Logan_Ollivier a aimé ceci.
11 oct. 2022 à 19 h 22
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 932
Mentions "j'aime": 320
Quoting: MatthewsFan
Do yourself a favor and at least look at things before you type.

BOS currently has waived Mike Rielly (3,000,000), Nick Foligno (3,800,000) and Chris Wagner (1,350,000) in the minors (thats a little over 8mil in salary just sitting in the minors lol) I can only imagine what you'd be saying if Kyle Dubas had that much salary buried in the minors.

They just signed Stralman for 1 year a 1mil. So now once Marchard and McAvoy are healthy will still need to waive another player and have a 22 man roster.

And yes, TBL is taking advantage of having Seabrook on LTIR.


It is absolutely less than ideal to have 21 man roster (which the Leafs can have starting Thursday) and a roster decision will have to be made once Liljgren is healthy, but again, this is not just a Leafs issue. lol


who cares what Boston waived, I don't care about billionaires money being spent.

Boston: They have a 20 man roster, at 400k under the cap... which includes Marchand and McAvoy.... so when they are back, they have a 22 man roster WITH buried penalties.

Tampa : They have a 20 man roster, right at the cap after LTIR Seabrook, with Cole potentially getting his contract annulled, and Cirelli and Bogosian on IR.... so, when they are back, (assuming Cole too), they have a 22 or 23 man roster below the cap

Toronto: They have a 20 man roster, are $2.1M over the cap, LTIR Lil & Benn bring them under the cap (just barely).... if either of them come back, Toronto has to shed cap hits and move a roster player (Engvall or Kerfoot most likely, giving them room a player and an ELC)....

The fact that you can't see this simple fact that your homerism is showing.

To reiterate Toronto is the only team that cannot ice a 21, 22, or 23 man roster without having to shed a roster player to make room.

No other team has to move someone to play a 21-22-23 man roster.

So, again, for your viewing pleasure, and hopefully you can understand it this time, Yes, it is solely a leafs issue to be this terrible at cap management, Yes they are the only team that has this predicament.
palhal a aimé ceci.
11 oct. 2022 à 19 h 27
#17
Ovchinnikov 137
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 10,412
Mentions "j'aime": 11,982
Quoting: KMMHL2012
who cares what Boston waived, I don't care about billionaires money being spent.

Boston: They have a 20 man roster, at 400k under the cap... which includes Marchand and McAvoy.... so when they are back, they have a 22 man roster WITH buried penalties.

Tampa : They have a 20 man roster, right at the cap after LTIR Seabrook, with Cole potentially getting his contract annulled, and Cirelli and Bogosian on IR.... so, when they are back, (assuming Cole too), they have a 22 or 23 man roster below the cap

Toronto: They have a 20 man roster, are $2.1M over the cap, LTIR Lil & Benn bring them under the cap (just barely).... if either of them come back, Toronto has to shed cap hits and move a roster player (Engvall or Kerfoot most likely, giving them room a player and an ELC)....

The fact that you can't see this simple fact that your homerism is showing.

To reiterate Toronto is the only team that cannot ice a 21, 22, or 23 man roster without having to shed a roster player to make room.

No other team has to move someone to play a 21-22-23 man roster.

So, again, for your viewing pleasure, and hopefully you can understand it this time, Yes, it is solely a leafs issue to be this terrible at cap management, Yes they are the only team that has this predicament.


For your viewing pleasure.


Fez3l8KWYA0fBCM?format=png&name=medium


Best illustration of how capped out the NHL is: Red line is the cap ceiling, green is the cap floor, anything over red is LTIR obviously.

And yes, I love the Leafs
Logan_Ollivier a aimé ceci.
11 oct. 2022 à 19 h 41
#18
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,074
Mentions "j'aime": 22,466
Quoting: MatthewsFan
Do yourself a favor and at least look at things before you type.

BOS currently has waived Mike Rielly (3,000,000), Nick Foligno (3,800,000) and Chris Wagner (1,350,000) in the minors (thats a little over 8mil in salary just sitting in the minors lol) I can only imagine what you'd be saying if Kyle Dubas had that much salary buried in the minors.

They just signed Stralman for 1 year a 1mil. So now once Marchard and McAvoy are healthy will still need to waive another player and have a 22 man roster.

And yes, TBL is taking advantage of having Seabrook on LTIR.


It is absolutely less than ideal to have 21 man roster (which the Leafs can have starting Thursday) and a roster decision will have to be made once Liljgren is healthy, but again, this is not just a Leafs issue. lol


Why were discussing the cap and wrote that that Tampa and Boston are in far better situation than Seabrook and MacAvoy are on long term LTIR. Has nothing to do with the Bruins having wasted 8m in bad signings and have them in the minors. Want to discuss stay on topic and facts I can only imagine what you'd be thinking if you understood the cap.

Good bye to those who can't write honestly.
CallingOutHomers a aimé ceci.
11 oct. 2022 à 19 h 42
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 932
Mentions "j'aime": 320
Quoting: MatthewsFan
For your viewing pleasure.


Fez3l8KWYA0fBCM?format=png&name=medium


Best illustration of how capped out the NHL is: Red line is the cap ceiling, green is the cap floor, anything over red is LTIR obviously.

And yes, I love the Leafs


Clearly, because you're just spamming graphs that say nothing other than "a lot of teams are spending a lot of money".

You know what I see in that graph..... only 1 team in that graph, can't ice a 21 man roster without trading a roster player away.

So, we're back to the topic at hand, the Leafs are the only ones with this issue.

Can you show me a graph about skate sizes, average height, age, weight.... because that's about as relevant as the other graphs you've posted to the question at hand, an Engvall trade and running a 20 man roster.
11 oct. 2022 à 19 h 44
#20
Ovchinnikov 137
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 10,412
Mentions "j'aime": 11,982
Quoting: palhal
Why were discussing the cap and wrote that that Tampa and Boston are in far better situation than Seabrook and MacAvoy are on long term LTIR. Has nothing to do with the Bruins having wasted 8m in bad signings and have them in the minors. Want to discuss stay on topic and facts I can only imagine what you'd be thinking if you understood the cap.

Good bye to those who can't write honestly.


Agreed, that's my bad. I usually like to stay away from your terrible takes.

Later
Logan_Ollivier a aimé ceci.
11 oct. 2022 à 23 h 9
#21
Marner rocks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 3,878
Mentions "j'aime": 869
Kerfoot is a fill in center, not a full season guy. Is the 3rd line or 4th line the shutdown line? Kerfoot has proven that he isn't a shutdown center that's the reason they got Kampf.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage