SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Not sure how else they can squeeze

Créé par: Gronk
Équipe: 2022-23 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 6 oct. 2022
Publié: 6 oct. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
TOR
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (FLA)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
Logo de TOR
Logo de FLA
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2082 500 000 $81 927 283 $212 500 $0 $572 717 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 oct. 2022 à 11 h 13
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 1,485
Mentions "j'aime": 453
it has to be engvall or Kerfoot i think, as much as i dont like holl he just doenst give you enough space really and Keef loves him to much also. that is why we gave up McCann in the expansion draft.
6 oct. 2022 à 11 h 20
#2
Let Him Cook
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 4,011
Mentions "j'aime": 962
holl looks way faster this year too, he"ll be a big part of our blue line, we need him more than kerfoot imo.
palhal a aimé ceci.
6 oct. 2022 à 11 h 35
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 1,574
Mentions "j'aime": 455
It's going to be ZAR, not Simmonds
6 oct. 2022 à 11 h 48
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2018
Messages: 6,317
Mentions "j'aime": 2,227
Engvall or Holl dont allow you to have 19 skaters, even though hes the best of the lot, Kerfoot has to go, or the team will struggle to ice a team (or overplay their top 7 players constantly).

Leafs arent hurting for offense, never do, but the age on defense or over-reliance on Sandin/iljegren who have never played top 4 minutes or 70+ games, makes Holl more important than Kerfoot.
palhal a aimé ceci.
6 oct. 2022 à 12 h 3
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 4,787
Mentions "j'aime": 2,007
Quoting: python3504
it has to be engvall or Kerfoot i think, as much as i dont like holl he just doenst give you enough space really and Keef loves him to much also. that is why we gave up McCann in the expansion draft.


I agree.

For the last couple seasons, NHL caliber blueline depth has been an issue with the Leafs, and now having 7, there is a knee jerk reaction to move one of them to get under cap. Holl isn't a big flashy name, but is economical and efficient in his game, and just underrated. Sure, there are better out there, but there are worse. Moving Holl will simply recreate a wheel where you Dubas will be hunting for D depthbat the deadline..... just like last year.

Which brings us to Kerfoot or Engvall.

Kerfoot is completely versatile, plays 200 feet, and can play centre - which seems to matter. Now, I am not sure if we get the 2021-22 Kerfoot this year, but his sample size is large enough to suggest he is a defensively reliable and good for 40 points.

Engvall is a bit more of an enigma - a player who has the size to play a heavy game (but really doesn't), his transition game is fantastic, skates well, and defends well, and plays centre in a pinch. What he can do offensively is anyone's guess. Did he catch lightening in a bottle last year, or has he finally found his game?

Overall, I move Kerfoot, and here is why.

1. He is a Swiss Army knife in the line up, and Dubas signed a second one in Järnkrok. He too can play up the line up and play centre. And just like Kerfoot, better on the wing.

2. Kerfoot has priced himself out of Toronto, guaranteed. Engvall at this point maybe has not. If he repeats his season from last year, there maybe a similar contract in line. Retaining Engvall is more likely than retaining Kerfoot.

3. Kerfoot nets a better return. We know Kerfoot is worth a 2nd, and we know we won't get that. Engvall on the market maybe nets a 3rd under equal, non cap related circumstances. The cap pinch drives that price down. Knowing a move has to be made, I would move the player that will garner the best asset possible.

4. The sudden emergence of Malgin and the somewhat expected showing of Robertson...... neither player is someone I would exactly want in my bottom 6. But, in the top 6 could thrive - and we have seen evidence of that.neither player ar this stage has the defensive capabilities of Kerfoot, but certainly the offense is there. Leafs fans have seen Roberston in a more limited role, and the results have been luke warm. Going back a couple.years, we can say the same for Malgin. Imo, neither player is really suited to replace Engvall in the bottom 6, (and ZAR is a great 4th line option if someone thinks he is it). But, to replace Kerfoot in the top 6? Yeah..... I could see it.

Certainly not the easiest decision to male here folks, but long.term, thinking through the process, it's Kerfoot.
6 oct. 2022 à 12 h 13
#6
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,479
Mentions "j'aime": 22,655
Quoting: Hammerwise
Engvall or Holl dont allow you to have 19 skaters, even though hes the best of the lot, Kerfoot has to go, or the team will struggle to ice a team (or overplay their top 7 players constantly).

Leafs arent hurting for offense, never do, but the age on defense or over-reliance on Sandin/iljegren who have never played top 4 minutes or 70+ games, makes Holl more important than Kerfoot.


Just to add....Benn is out a month, and Dalmstrom six months. Leafs have absolutely no NHL Dman depth . It's insanity to think a 20 man roster works with only 6 NHL Dmen.
Hammerwise a aimé ceci.
6 oct. 2022 à 12 h 14
#7
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,479
Mentions "j'aime": 22,655
Quoting: jake4leafs
holl looks way faster this year too, he"ll be a big part of our blue line, we need him more than kerfoot imo.


I was really surprised how poor Holl's skating was last year compared to 20/21. Hope you're right about his speed "way faster" this year.
JAKE6 a aimé ceci.
6 oct. 2022 à 13 h 2
#8
Let Him Cook
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 4,011
Mentions "j'aime": 962
Modifié 6 oct. 2022 à 13 h 11
Quoting: palhal
I was really surprised how poor Holl's skating was last year compared to 20/21. Hope you're right about his speed "way faster" this year.


he is 15 pounds lighter, and it showed in pre season, he used to get burned far and wide by anyone, and now he seems to be around his man which was a pretty big issue in his game last year
palhal a aimé ceci.
6 oct. 2022 à 13 h 4
#9
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,479
Mentions "j'aime": 22,655
Quoting: jake4leafs
he is 15 pounds lighter, and it showed in pre season, he used to get burned far and wide by anyone, and now he seems to be always around his man which was a pretty big issue in his game last year imo


What I noticed last season, is when skating forward especially with the puck, he just glided instead of taking strides.
JAKE6 a aimé ceci.
6 oct. 2022 à 13 h 9
#10
Let Him Cook
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 4,011
Mentions "j'aime": 962
Quoting: palhal
What I noticed last season, is when skating forward especially with the puck, he just glided instead of taking strides.


fear of making turnovers? possibly looking down and getting rocked? i also think he knows his role is to be a that shutdown guy, with him getting caught out of place at times hes probably afraid of making mistakes
palhal a aimé ceci.
6 oct. 2022 à 13 h 12
#11
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,479
Mentions "j'aime": 22,655
Quoting: jake4leafs
fear of making turnovers? possibly looking down and getting rocked? i also think he knows his role is to be a that shutdown guy, with him getting caught out of place at times hes probably afraid of making mistakes


Lack of confidence is career killer in any profession. I think I got this quote correct from NFL coaching legend Vince Lombardi, " Fear makes cowards of us all."
JAKE6 a aimé ceci.
6 oct. 2022 à 13 h 57
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 1,485
Mentions "j'aime": 453
Quoting: jake4leafs
he is 15 pounds lighter, and it showed in pre season, he used to get burned far and wide by anyone, and now he seems to be around his man which was a pretty big issue in his game last year


true but he still makes some head scratching decisions at times.
6 oct. 2022 à 13 h 59
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 1,485
Mentions "j'aime": 453
Quoting: swinny
I agree.

For the last couple seasons, NHL caliber blueline depth has been an issue with the Leafs, and now having 7, there is a knee jerk reaction to move one of them to get under cap. Holl isn't a big flashy name, but is economical and efficient in his game, and just underrated. Sure, there are better out there, but there are worse. Moving Holl will simply recreate a wheel where you Dubas will be hunting for D depthbat the deadline..... just like last year.

Which brings us to Kerfoot or Engvall.

Kerfoot is completely versatile, plays 200 feet, and can play centre - which seems to matter. Now, I am not sure if we get the 2021-22 Kerfoot this year, but his sample size is large enough to suggest he is a defensively reliable and good for 40 points.

Engvall is a bit more of an enigma - a player who has the size to play a heavy game (but really doesn't), his transition game is fantastic, skates well, and defends well, and plays centre in a pinch. What he can do offensively is anyone's guess. Did he catch lightening in a bottle last year, or has he finally found his game?

Overall, I move Kerfoot, and here is why.

1. He is a Swiss Army knife in the line up, and Dubas signed a second one in Järnkrok. He too can play up the line up and play centre. And just like Kerfoot, better on the wing.

2. Kerfoot has priced himself out of Toronto, guaranteed. Engvall at this point maybe has not. If he repeats his season from last year, there maybe a similar contract in line. Retaining Engvall is more likely than retaining Kerfoot.

3. Kerfoot nets a better return. We know Kerfoot is worth a 2nd, and we know we won't get that. Engvall on the market maybe nets a 3rd under equal, non cap related circumstances. The cap pinch drives that price down. Knowing a move has to be made, I would move the player that will garner the best asset possible.

4. The sudden emergence of Malgin and the somewhat expected showing of Robertson...... neither player is someone I would exactly want in my bottom 6. But, in the top 6 could thrive - and we have seen evidence of that.neither player ar this stage has the defensive capabilities of Kerfoot, but certainly the offense is there. Leafs fans have seen Roberston in a more limited role, and the results have been luke warm. Going back a couple.years, we can say the same for Malgin. Imo, neither player is really suited to replace Engvall in the bottom 6, (and ZAR is a great 4th line option if someone thinks he is it). But, to replace Kerfoot in the top 6? Yeah..... I could see it.

Certainly not the easiest decision to male here folks, but long.term, thinking through the process, it's Kerfoot.


I agree with you, but my question is what do they get for Kerfoot, i see alot of people saying leafs would have to add but i cant see that.
6 oct. 2022 à 16 h 39
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 4,787
Mentions "j'aime": 2,007
Quoting: python3504
I agree with you, but my question is what do they get for Kerfoot, i see alot of people saying leafs would have to add but i cant see that.


No. I disagree. I am thinking a 3rd or 4th, maybe a mid level prospect, much like the Johnsson for Anderson deal.

Kerfoot has positive value. Just because there is a cap squeeze doesn't mitigate that fact. But, the chance to get market value (which would have been during the opening days of free agency at the latest) is gone.

Still see Calgary, Minny and the Peg having interest. He fits in any of those systems well. Just accept a less than market return and move on.
Hammerwise et python3504 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage