SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Would you trade Shane Pinto for Jakob Chychrun straight up

Créé par: sensonfire
Équipe: 2022-23 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 28 sept. 2022
Publié: 28 sept. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
OTT
  1. Chychrun, Jakob
Détails additionnels:
I would say it's pretty clear that we are not trading Pinto for Chychrun.


Because Arizona would want additional pieces as well.
ARI
  1. Pinto, Shane
Détails additionnels:
But what if Arizona actually offered to trade Chychrun for Pinto and nothing else?


Should Ottawa pull the trigger on a Chychrun-Pinto swap?


Let me know your thoughts.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de NSH
2024
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de WSH
Logo de OTT
Logo de TBL
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $81 306 548 $0 $3 425 000 $1 193 452 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 205 714 $8 205 714 $
AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
7 950 000 $7 950 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 975 000 $4 975 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
821 667 $821 667 $
C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
762 500 $762 500 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
950 000 $950 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 666 667 $3 666 667 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
900 000 $900 000 $
DG/DD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
Would you trade Shane Pinto for Jakob Chychrun straight up?
Le graphique a été masqué

Options de sondage


28 sept. 2022 à 15 h 46
#1
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
I wouldn't. Not to play him on the right side. In my opinion ottawa should be looking for someone who can play the right side.
csick, sensonfire, Nhl_oilers and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
28 sept. 2022 à 15 h 47
#2
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,827
Mentions "j'aime": 23,916
I wouldn’t move Shane Pinto period
sensonfire, GenXHockey et Nhl_oilers a aimé ceci.
28 sept. 2022 à 15 h 52
#3
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Quoting: csick
I wouldn’t move Shane Pinto period


If Ethan Bear is in fact available that move makes more sense. Paying the big price for chychrun to play him on his weak side where he isn't worth the haul makes no sense. A team like LA would make more sense.

Chabot-Zub
Sanderson-bear
Holden-Hamonic
Zaitsev

Move zaitsev in the offseason when it will cost less. He's a perfectly fine 5/6 guy to fill in for injuries.
sensonfire et GMBL a aimé ceci.
28 sept. 2022 à 15 h 53
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 2,614
Mentions "j'aime": 1,666
What has shane pinto done to justify being worth JC?
28 sept. 2022 à 16 h 6
#5
Démarrer sujet
sensonfire
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 11,812
Mentions "j'aime": 4,451
Quoting: Black61
What has shane pinto done to justify being worth JC?


The hype.
Dan10900 et villenash a aimé ceci.
28 sept. 2022 à 16 h 7
#6
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,827
Mentions "j'aime": 23,916
Quoting: Black61
What has shane pinto done to justify being worth JC?


The hype. He’s gonna play both the PP and PK , he’s gonna be deployed against the best opposing top lines. This kid is too good to trade
sensonfire et Nhl_oilers a aimé ceci.
28 sept. 2022 à 16 h 16
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 16,998
Mentions "j'aime": 11,998
I'm not gonna argue Pinto is a more valuable asset, but I agree with Ottawa's decision not to move him for Chychrun
csick, Nhl_oilers et sensonfire a aimé ceci.
28 sept. 2022 à 16 h 20
#8
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,827
Mentions "j'aime": 23,916
Quoting: Claesson4Norris
I'm not gonna argue Pinto is a more valuable asset, but I agree with Ottawa's decision not to move him for Chychrun


Next year he absolutely will be. Remember how badly Tampa didn’t want to trade Cirelli his first few years? And then they won 2 cups
sensonfire a aimé ceci.
28 sept. 2022 à 16 h 22
#9
Reinbacher Josi 2.0
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2022
Messages: 4,123
Mentions "j'aime": 2,278
Hate to break it to ya, but Chychrun, who is slightly overrated, is still very good, on a good contract, and will cost much more than just Pinto (Probably a protected first, another prospect, a pick somewhere between 2nd-4th round).
Dan10900, sensonfire, villenash and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
28 sept. 2022 à 16 h 32
#10
gavinray
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 2,167
Mentions "j'aime": 561
You can't appreciate Pinto unless you watch him. The stats don't do him justice.
He was the best player on the ice last preseason game 1g, 1a.
He's already one of the better defensive players on the team at such a young age - like a Bergeron lite.
Chychrun is overrated and doesn't fill our D need very well.
sensonfire, GMBL, csick and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
28 sept. 2022 à 16 h 35
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 7,990
Mentions "j'aime": 4,210
I agree with the other guys. Pinto is going to be a very good player, and Ottawa will absolutely benefit big time if they keep him. However, looking at it from Arizona’s perspective, I can’t see why they would do it either. If I’m Arizona, with how good Pinto is going to be, they have Cooley, Geekie, and Hayton coming up to fill those centre positions, and if they all pan out, that could be a very good center depth. If I’m Arizona, I want a stud LHD back as the main piece for Chychrun.. now I’m not saying it’s fair, but if I’m Arizona, I would say it’s either Sanderson coming over, or it’s a very good prospect/roster player as the main piece. Now instantly Ottawa should decline and tell them to keep him then, but that’s what I would want. Not necessarily Sanderson, but a good LHD as the main piece.
sensonfire a aimé ceci.
28 sept. 2022 à 16 h 48
#12
Lets Get Kraken
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,470
I imagine Geekie likely gets developed as a W/C if Chychrun gets moved for a package involving Pinto, and with the likelihood of the Yotes being one of the most likely destinations for Matthews, I get why they would want Pinto, but it wouldn’t make much sense for them to have Matthews, Cooley, Geekie, Pinto, and Hayton all try to play down the middle.

I’m still of the opinion the Yotes shouldn’t trade Chychrun, but Chychrun wants to go to a contender, and the Yotes are open to his requests. I imagine the big assets they want back would be a 1st, more than likely unprotected or with minimal protection in 2023, a higher end LHD prospect, and a higher end W prospect. Either which way, Ottawa won’t want to move Pinto based on his potential, and Arizona won’t move Chychrun for Pinto straight up.
csick et sensonfire a aimé ceci.
28 sept. 2022 à 16 h 52
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 8,566
Mentions "j'aime": 3,319
Quoting: MTL_stats
Hate to break it to ya, but Chychrun, who is slightly overrated, is still very good, on a good contract, and will cost much more than just Pinto (Probably a protected first, another prospect, a pick somewhere between 2nd-4th round).


Pretty much any futures trade for an established good player is going to require a lot. The ask on Chychrun is just ridiculous, he's being super overrated but he's still very young, so if he does reach a different level down the road ARZ doesn't want to undersell in hindsight.

That being said I think the point of the excercise is to ignore the actual trade values, and examine the tradeoff in terms of which player is going to provide the Sens with the most value, not just now but in the coming years as well. Personally, I agree with @GenXHockey in them getting a serviceable, young RHD like Bear who won't cost too much instead of playing Chychrun on his offside. The Sens are in danger of trying to get better too fast which may not yield the desired results and also impact their ability to retain potential key pieces in DeBrincat and Zub.

If they insist on Chychrun, I think they should be moving Brannstrom+ who perhaps might develop into a LHD that can play the right side just as well as Chychrun. Giving up Pinto if he can really play PK and PP well in the NHL would be a mistake. There's also the potential to have him on a super cheap two-year deal if he's extended before he does anything in the NHL.

I'm guessing the ask for Chychrun and to move Zaitsev was Pinto+Brannstrom+ 2023 1st + a 2nd or 3rd.
Caufield, sensonfire et GenXHockey a aimé ceci.
28 sept. 2022 à 16 h 57
#14
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,827
Mentions "j'aime": 23,916
Quoting: MTL_stats
Hate to break it to ya, but Chychrun, who is slightly overrated, is still very good, on a good contract, and will cost much more than just Pinto (Probably a protected first, another prospect, a pick somewhere between 2nd-4th round).


LOOOOOOOOL
28 sept. 2022 à 17 h 0
#15
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,827
Mentions "j'aime": 23,916
Quoting: GMBL
Pretty much any futures trade for an established good player is going to require a lot. The ask on Chychrun is just ridiculous, he's being super overrated but he's still very young, so if he does reach a different level down the road ARZ doesn't want to undersell in hindsight.

That being said I think the point of the excercise is to ignore the actual trade values, and examine the tradeoff in terms of which player is going to provide the Sens with the most value, not just now but in the coming years as well. Personally, I agree with GenXHockey in them getting a serviceable, young RHD like Bear who won't cost too much instead of playing Chychrun on his offside. The Sens are in danger of trying to get better too fast which may not yield the desired results and also impact their ability to retain potential key pieces in DeBrincat and Zub.

If they insist on Chychrun, I think they should be moving Brannstrom+ who perhaps might develop into a LHD that can play the right side just as well as Chychrun. Giving up Pinto if he can really play PK and PP well in the NHL would be a mistake. There's also the potential to have him on a super cheap two-year deal if he's extended before he does anything in the NHL.

I'm guessing the ask for Chychrun and to move Zaitsev was Pinto+Brannstrom+ 2023 1st + a 2nd or 3rd.


Ottawa isn’t going to trade him. His potential is sky high as a 2 way player and will without a doubt be the best defensive player on the Sens while being able to score a lot of pts . He will be very valuable in the playoffs. Chychrun isn’t needed at the expense of Pinto
sensonfire et GMBL a aimé ceci.
28 sept. 2022 à 17 h 10
#16
NoWah49
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 4,865
Mentions "j'aime": 1,432
If the Sens didn't have Sanderson, I would say sure, but otherwise I'm not sure it's worth it
sensonfire, GMBL et prostyle a aimé ceci.
28 sept. 2022 à 17 h 29
#17
Bet On It
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 610
Mentions "j'aime": 230
If Chychrun was a RHD, maybe. I still think Pinto will offer more value to the Sens than Chychrun could, and that they'd be better off looking for a cheaper option.

But Chychrun's a LHD, so it's a moot point. It's not worth giving up the potential Pinto has for someone to have to play out of position. Depth helps win cups, and Pinto's trending at the very least to be an exceptional 3C. I personally think he'll be one of Ottawa's top 6 C's as early as 2023.
sensonfire, GMBL et prostyle a aimé ceci.
28 sept. 2022 à 18 h 19
#18
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,827
Mentions "j'aime": 23,916




Ahem
sensonfire et gavinray a aimé ceci.
28 sept. 2022 à 18 h 20
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,495
Mentions "j'aime": 3,718
Modifié 28 sept. 2022 à 18 h 32
Quoting: csick
I wouldn’t move Shane Pinto period


Re-assuring that Dorion and co know this as well

Pinto is an unicorn type player, you just don't move him at all.

Sanderson, Greig and Pinto are guys that you just don't trade. I'd actually rather trade DeBrincat next season if that could get us a young stud RHD

Quoting: Black61
What has shane pinto done to justify being worth JC?


Projectability

Quoting: gavinray
You can't appreciate Pinto unless you watch him. The stats don't do him justice.


Using stats to "appreciate" a player is stupid anyway but even more so for a player like Pinto

Ask Montreal if they regret letting Phillip Danault go

If Pinto wasn't injured all season last year these discussions wouldn't even happen.

Quoting: Claebom
I personally think he'll be one of Ottawa's top 6 C's as early as 2023.


Stutzle and Norris are both signed for 8 years though (well, 9 for Stutzle)

Stutzle - Norris - Pinto is going to be a deadly trio of Centers

Just let it happen.
sensonfire et csick a aimé ceci.
28 sept. 2022 à 18 h 33
#20
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,827
Mentions "j'aime": 23,916
Quoting: Xspyrit
Re-assuring that Dorion and co know this as well

Pinto is an unicorn type player, you just don't move him at all.

Sanderson, Greig and Pinto are guys that you just don't trade. I'd actually rather trade DeBrincat next season if that could get us a young stud RHD



Projectability



Using stats to "appreciate" a player is stupid anyway but even more so for a player like Pinto

Ask Montreal if they regret letting Phillip Danault go

If Pinto wasn't injured all season last year these discussions wouldn't even happen.



Stutzle and Norris are both signed for 8 years though (well, 9 for Stutzle)

Stutzle - Norris - Pinto is going to be a deadly trio of Centers

Just let it happen.


If Debrincat doesn’t want to re-sign , trade him for like Ryan Pulock
sensonfire a aimé ceci.
28 sept. 2022 à 18 h 39
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,495
Mentions "j'aime": 3,718
Quoting: csick
If Debrincat doesn’t want to re-sign , trade him for like Ryan Pulock


His contract is great and he's RD so it wouldn't be a bad idea... plus maybe we get a pick or two
csick et sensonfire a aimé ceci.
28 sept. 2022 à 18 h 54
#22
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,827
Mentions "j'aime": 23,916
Quoting: Xspyrit
His contract is great and he's RD so it wouldn't be a bad idea... plus maybe we get a pick or two


Maybe add Thomson and they add an equivalent forward prospect to even the deal idk
sensonfire a aimé ceci.
28 sept. 2022 à 20 h 6
#23
Formerly Jamiepo
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 21,157
Mentions "j'aime": 10,700
Modifié 28 sept. 2022 à 20 h 56
Quoting: evelutions2
I imagine Geekie likely gets developed as a W/C if Chychrun gets moved for a package involving Pinto, and with the likelihood of the Yotes being one of the most likely destinations for Matthews, I get why they would want Pinto, but it wouldn’t make much sense for them to have Matthews, Cooley, Geekie, Pinto, and Hayton all try to play down the middle.

I’m still of the opinion the Yotes shouldn’t trade Chychrun, but Chychrun wants to go to a contender, and the Yotes are open to his requests. I imagine the big assets they want back would be a 1st, more than likely unprotected or with minimal protection in 2023, a higher end LHD prospect, and a higher end W prospect. Either which way, Ottawa won’t want to move Pinto based on his potential, and Arizona won’t move Chychrun for Pinto straight up.


On the list of teams to acquire Matthews Arizona is number 182. This is after every other nhl, khl, liga, shl, sel and a few teams from other leagues who can actually afford him pass.
sensonfire a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Chargement de l'animation
Soumettre les modifications du sondage