SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

100m team solved with math

Créé par: pretzelcoatl
Équipe: 2022-23 Équipe personnalisée
Date de création initiale: 25 sept. 2022
Publié: 25 sept. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Same program as my lineup from yesterday, with my personal goalie choices and no ELCs.
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
20100 000 000 $99 248 584 $0 $750 000 $751 416 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
5 450 000 $5 450 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
AG, AD, C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Islanders de New York
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 666 667 $5 666 667 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
950 000 $950 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
750 000 $750 000 $ (Bonis de performance750 000 $$750K)
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DD
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
25 sept. 2022 à 13 h 20
#1
Owly
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,559
Mentions "j'aime": 932
If you replace Mangiapane and Nelson with Kampf and ZAR you can likely fit McDavid and then this team is the best.
25 sept. 2022 à 13 h 34
#2
Démarrer sujet
n.1 Topias Vilen fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 5,900
Mentions "j'aime": 2,569
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
If you replace Mangiapane and Nelson with Kampf and ZAR you can likely fit McDavid and then this team is the best.


Aston-Reese is not currently signed. Let's say he signs to league minimum and take a look at the numbers.

Kampf: 1.5m, 1.03 WAR, 0.686 WAR/$
ZAR: 750k, -0.23 WAR, N/A WAR/$
Mangiapane: 5.8m, 5.32 WAR, 0.917 WAR/$
Nelson: 6m, 4.34 WAR, 0.723 WAR/$
McDavid: 12.5m, 7.95 WAR, 0.636 WAR/$

Mangiapane and Nelson are a more efficient use of cap space than McDavid. Their 11.8m is worth 9.66 wins, whereas McDavid's 12.5 is only worth 7.95. Kampf is more efficient than McDavid as well, but ZAR would be a detriment to the team. Of course, this is all using Bacon's WAR model, so if you think it's low on McDavid or high on Nelson and Mangiapane, that's totally reasonable.
25 sept. 2022 à 17 h 7
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,440
Mentions "j'aime": 6,060
Quoting: pretzelcoatl
Aston-Reese is not currently signed. Let's say he signs to league minimum and take a look at the numbers.

Kampf: 1.5m, 1.03 WAR, 0.686 WAR/$
ZAR: 750k, -0.23 WAR, N/A WAR/$
Mangiapane: 5.8m, 5.32 WAR, 0.917 WAR/$
Nelson: 6m, 4.34 WAR, 0.723 WAR/$
McDavid: 12.5m, 7.95 WAR, 0.636 WAR/$

Mangiapane and Nelson are a more efficient use of cap space than McDavid. Their 11.8m is worth 9.66 wins, whereas McDavid's 12.5 is only worth 7.95. Kampf is more efficient than McDavid as well, but ZAR would be a detriment to the team. Of course, this is all using Bacon's WAR model, so if you think it's low on McDavid or high on Nelson and Mangiapane, that's totally reasonable.


Why not do WAR per 60 per $? WAR/$ doesnt account for differences in # of GP or minutes played (eg guys like Marchment has a higher WAR/60 and lower cap hit than Buchnevich but Buchnevich has a higher total WAR since he played more)
pretzelcoatl a aimé ceci.
25 sept. 2022 à 18 h 30
#4
Démarrer sujet
n.1 Topias Vilen fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 5,900
Mentions "j'aime": 2,569
Quoting: UpsideDownQue
Why not do WAR per 60 per $? WAR/$ doesnt account for differences in # of GP or minutes played (eg guys like Marchment has a higher WAR/60 and lower cap hit than Buchnevich but Buchnevich has a higher total WAR since he played more)


Good point. I didn't have access to WAR/60.
25 sept. 2022 à 18 h 45
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 8,440
Mentions "j'aime": 6,060
Quoting: pretzelcoatl
Good point. I didn't have access to WAR/60.


TOI is one of the columns in the data Patrick Bacon posts to his public tableau page: https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/topdownhockey/viz/WinsAboveReplacement2021-2022/WinsAboveReplacement

You can just add a new column dividing WAR by TOI
pretzelcoatl a aimé ceci.
25 sept. 2022 à 21 h 37
#6
Démarrer sujet
n.1 Topias Vilen fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 5,900
Mentions "j'aime": 2,569
Quoting: UpsideDownQue
TOI is one of the columns in the data Patrick Bacon posts to his public tableau page: https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/topdownhockey/viz/WinsAboveReplacement2021-2022/WinsAboveReplacement

You can just add a new column dividing WAR by TOI


So I've added the TOI data to my sheet but I need to change some things before it goes into the program. Top 10 WAR/60/$ leaders, minimum 200 mins played:
1. Nathan Walker
2. Calen Addison (201 minutes played lmao)
3. Michael Ammadio
4. Matt Boldy
5. Noah Cates
6. Chad Ruhwedel
7. Seth Jarvis
8. Justin Danforth
9. Troy Terry
10. Tage Thompson
UpsideDownQue a aimé ceci.
25 sept. 2022 à 21 h 52
#7
Wingsfan92
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 861
Mentions "j'aime": 160
this defense worries me a bit but igor should be good enough lol
25 sept. 2022 à 23 h 3
#8
Démarrer sujet
n.1 Topias Vilen fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 5,900
Mentions "j'aime": 2,569
Modifié 25 sept. 2022 à 23 h 10
Quoting: C_LGRW71
this defense worries me a bit but igor should be good enough lol


Defense is all diamonds in the rough. Their contracts are so good that upgrading the forwards becomes the only priority. In my opinion, Siegenthaler-Makar would be the second best pairing in the league, after Toews-Makar.

Edit: I'll also throw it out there that if you allow ELCs, the defense group becomes Toews, Makar, Seider, (K'Andre) Miller, Ruhwedel, Jensen
C_LGRW71 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage