SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Horvat for Chychrun

Créé par: gordfish
Équipe: 2022-23 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 25 sept. 2022
Publié: 25 sept. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Obviously Horvat won't resign in Arizona, but they can flip him. They are not going to get what they are reportedly asking for Chychrun (two firsts, an A prospect and a roster player) or he would have already been dealt, but they can start the bidding for Horvat with what the Jets got for Copp; a prospect, a first and a second-round pick (in a very deep draft).

Chychrun would set up in Vancouver a lot like Sergachev has in Tampa.
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de NYR
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2025
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $80 714 167 $1 250 000 $2 000 000 $1 785 833 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
450 000 $450 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 260 000 $7 260 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
25 sept. 2022 à 12 h 59
#1
NoQuitInNewYork
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 2,124
Mentions "j'aime": 743
Coyotes decline
GMBL a aimé ceci.
25 sept. 2022 à 13 h 3
#2
alwaysnextyear
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 5,494
Mentions "j'aime": 1,549
Even if they don't get what they're currently asking for Chychrun (which I agree they won't), they'll still get better offers than this from other teams.
GMBL et majormoose007 a aimé ceci.
25 sept. 2022 à 13 h 4
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 1,550
Mentions "j'aime": 1,276
Easy no from Arizona... And this post is just dumb, do the trade from Arizona's POV if the focus is what they're going to get from a Horvat trade.

Chychrun would easily get them a return more than Copp's, they're just asking for too good of a prospect and they have more time to work through trades than a deadline deal.

The Copp trade also wasn't as rich as you're implying. It was a conditional pick that was pretty unlikely to turn into a first, but the Rangers over-achieved.
GMBL, Xqb15a et majormoose007 a aimé ceci.
25 sept. 2022 à 13 h 4
#4
Breadman likes Bread
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2017
Messages: 3,492
Mentions "j'aime": 1,729
Bad asset management for the Coyotes in my opinion. Why would they trade a guy away who still has term left on his deal (and who’s a better player in his own right,) for a pending UFA who they might not even get appropriate trade value for? I’m not saying it’s a bad move, I’m just not sure if it makes sense for the Coyotes.
GMBL a aimé ceci.
25 sept. 2022 à 13 h 14
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 8,566
Mentions "j'aime": 3,319
They might not get their ask on Chychrun but they are certainly going to get less than that on Horvat when they try to flip him. They would need to be getting Horvat+ for them to possibly get more.
25 sept. 2022 à 13 h 16
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,252
Mentions "j'aime": 8,893
The “you can flip him” take is so much BS. If you are trading your best player you aren’t going back to your billionaire boss and saying “I know this has been going on for a year but I traded our best player locked up on a good deal for a pending UFA who we have no chance of re-signing”. Doing stupid things like that doesn’t just get you fired it kills your career. Needless to say AZ is never doing this trade.
25 sept. 2022 à 13 h 19
#7
alwaysnextyear
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 5,494
Mentions "j'aime": 1,549
Quoting: Xqb15a
The “you can flip him” take is so much BS. If you are trading your best player you aren’t going back to your billionaire boss and saying “I know this has been going on for a year but I traded our best player locked up on a good deal for a pending UFA who we have no chance of re-signing”. Doing stupid things like that doesn’t just get you fired it kills your career. Needless to say AZ is never doing this trade.


To me it makes sense only if the pending UFA they're acquiring is the 3rd or 4th piece in the deal. Something like 1st, 2nd, prospect and 'pending UFA you can flip at the deadline'.
25 sept. 2022 à 13 h 30
#8
Pop Pop
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 14,461
Mentions "j'aime": 8,213
They'd have less leverage movng Horvat than chychrun so I don't see how this helps them.
mk458 a aimé ceci.
25 sept. 2022 à 13 h 48
#9
You know nothing JS
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,998
Mentions "j'aime": 4,395
Arizona wants picks and futures. And you thought offering a soon to be UFA was a good idea?!?
mk458 a aimé ceci.
25 sept. 2022 à 14 h 0
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 16,883
Mentions "j'aime": 11,894
They'll get more for Chychrun
mk458 a aimé ceci.
25 sept. 2022 à 14 h 0
#11
Future Norris guy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 14,855
Mentions "j'aime": 8,323
Why would Arizona do this? Horvat is a pending UFA. Good chance he wouldn't even sign with Arizona. Prospects and 1st round picks is what Bill Armstrong wants.
mk458, jpsnow13 et majormoose007 a aimé ceci.
25 sept. 2022 à 14 h 3
#12
MK458
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 2,103
Mentions "j'aime": 928
This is ridiculous. If this is what they could get back for Chychrun then they simply wouldn't trade Chychrun. He's a great player on a bargain contract for multiple seasons after this one. Arizona has stated that they're okay keeping Chychrun if they don't find the right deal. This is not even close to the right deal
25 sept. 2022 à 14 h 10
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 2,152
Mentions "j'aime": 992
This is legitimately one of the worst ideas I’ve ever seen on this site. What logic is Arizona using to give up the more valuable asset with cost control, for the less valuable pending UFA?
25 sept. 2022 à 14 h 45
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,252
Mentions "j'aime": 8,893
Quoting: alwaysnextyear
To me it makes sense only if the pending UFA they're acquiring is the 3rd or 4th piece in the deal. Something like 1st, 2nd, prospect and 'pending UFA you can flip at the deadline'.


That’s fair, but as the primary piece it’s utter nonsense.
25 sept. 2022 à 15 h 26
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2018
Messages: 2,635
Mentions "j'aime": 1,167
Canucks are NOT trading our capt.IMHO.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage