SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

sens should probably be all over ethan bear

Créé par: Borocop
Équipe: 2022-23 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 21 sept. 2022
Publié: 21 sept. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
cheap, RFA expiry, probably wont cost a ton to acquire, and allows them to sit on a potential chychrun trade into the season.
Transactions
CAR
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (WSH)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de NSH
2024
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de TBL
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2482 500 000 $79 254 880 $0 $4 040 000 $3 245 120 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 205 714 $8 205 714 $
AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
7 950 000 $7 950 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 975 000 $4 975 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
838 333 $838 333 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
950 000 $950 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 666 667 $3 666 667 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
762 500 $762 500 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
818 333 $818 333 $ (Bonis de performance15 000 $$15K)
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
900 000 $900 000 $
DG/DD, AG
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
21 sept. 2022 à 22 h 24
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,915
Mentions "j'aime": 725
Anything to keep Branstrom on the bench, right?
21 sept. 2022 à 22 h 26
#2
Démarrer sujet
Au-revoir Dorion
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 4,500
Mentions "j'aime": 2,970
Quoting: mvp13
Anything to keep Branstrom on the bench, right?


basically everyone outside of sanderson zub and chabot are interchangeable imo
21 sept. 2022 à 22 h 28
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,915
Mentions "j'aime": 725
Quoting: Borocop
basically everyone outside of sanderson zub and chabot are interchangeable imo


I think you'd have to give CAR a defenseman though, depending whatever happens with De Haan or Gardiner. Even if Chatfield is good, they could not have any relevant 7th D. I'm sure they sign De Haan and make my point moot, but at least for now that's the story
Borocop a aimé ceci.
21 sept. 2022 à 23 h 12
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2018
Messages: 7,123
Mentions "j'aime": 3,476
Quoting: mvp13
I think you'd have to give CAR a defenseman though, depending whatever happens with De Haan or Gardiner. Even if Chatfield is good, they could not have any relevant 7th D. I'm sure they sign De Haan and make my point moot, but at least for now that's the story


Brannstrom for Bear one for one?
22 sept. 2022 à 1 h 14
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,493
Mentions "j'aime": 5,024
Quoting: mvp13
I think you'd have to give CAR a defenseman though, depending whatever happens with De Haan or Gardiner. Even if Chatfield is good, they could not have any relevant 7th D. I'm sure they sign De Haan and make my point moot, but at least for now that's the story


You have completely missed the point on why Carolina would move Bear. Ignore the top 4 (Slavin - Burns, Skjei - Pesce)

Bear, Coghlan, Chatfield, De Haan. Currently all there. Lajoie has played in the NHL before and is also an option. The reason they could move Bear is because they have all that luxury. Carolina would not want a D man back. A 2nd for Bear is MORE Than good enough thanks and goodbye
22 sept. 2022 à 9 h 39
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 16,971
Mentions "j'aime": 11,965
Quoting: mvp13
Anything to keep Branstrom on the bench, right?


Brannstrom is far from the problem. He's fine.
22 sept. 2022 à 10 h 37
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 1,668
Mentions "j'aime": 772
Quoting: Caniac2000
You have completely missed the point on why Carolina would move Bear. Ignore the top 4 (Slavin - Burns, Skjei - Pesce)

Bear, Coghlan, Chatfield, De Haan. Currently all there. Lajoie has played in the NHL before and is also an option. The reason they could move Bear is because they have all that luxury. Carolina would not want a D man back. A 2nd for Bear is MORE Than good enough thanks and goodbye


We know Lajoie has played in NHL he was a Senator, lol. But he really is only AHL level.

I would love to see the Sens pick up Bear, he would be a great value and still has some potential higher upside to grow, plus he is a RD. I could see a Sanderson - Bear pairing working nicely.
No need to give up a D as well here Branstrom for all the noise around him is still a great puck mover and can QB a PP, I really see no reason for Sens to move him, even if he is only playing 3rd pairing and 2nd PP.
With Motte coming in, what I would really like is for them to move out Grambel and pick for him.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage