SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Made By A Flames Fan

Créé par: KingofRnR
Équipe: 2022-23 Devils du New Jersey
Date de création initiale: 20 sept. 2022
Publié: 20 sept. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2975 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1750 000 $
Transactions
1.
NJD
  1. Duehr, Walker
  2. Kylington, Oliver
  3. Littler, Cade [Liste de réserve]
  4. Ruzicka, Adam [Droits de RFA]
  5. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (CGY)
CGY
  1. Bahl, Kevin
  2. Bastian, Nathan
  3. McLeod, Michael
  4. Zetterlund, Fabian
Détails additionnels:
Flames takes the risk of McLeod Hockey Canada Investigation, but NJD only received a 3rd Round Pick and Cade Littler as compensation
2.
3.
NJD
  1. Farinacci, John [Liste de réserve]
ARI
  1. Johnsson, Andreas
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (CGY)
4.
NJD
  1. Greer, AJ
  2. Choix de 7e ronde en 2023 (LAK)
BOS
  1. McCarthy, Case [Liste de réserve]
Rachats de contrats
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de LAK
2024
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
2025
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
Logo de NJD
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $81 908 293 $0 $1 550 000 $591 707 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
5 450 000 $5 450 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 375 000 $2 375 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
874 125 $874 125 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 166 667 $3 166 667 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
925 000 $925 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
975 000 $975 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DG/DD, AG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
21 sept. 2022 à 0 h 11
#51
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: KingofRnR
676314069039530033

The way you wrote that just doesn't seem like you're very secure or confident about that


You have no way of being able to tell
CEO a aimé ceci.
21 sept. 2022 à 0 h 14
#52
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,130
Mentions "j'aime": 18,343
Quoting: KingofRnR
Gaudreau's a liar. he said a lot of things that didn't materialize. Yes, Goaltending was your biggest need, but signing Vitek Vanecek was a huge step in the right direction, so now it's a 1.00PPG+ LW in my eyes, since you already have solutions internally coming up to bolster your Defense, both at LD & RD


It’s goaltending, but hardest position to evaluate via trade.

If we were to do some massive deal, I think a Mercer+dman for Spencer Knight (or similar deal) helps us more.

Otherwise…with Sharangovich, Palat, Holtz, Wood, Foote, Gritsyuk on left side, I don’t think there is a sense of urgency to add another. Especially if we are paying 1C prices.
21 sept. 2022 à 0 h 17
#53
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,130
Mentions "j'aime": 18,343
Quoting: Juiceman
It is more quantity than quality. I guarantee you the Canucks don't value Shakir as a first round pick. It has to be Nemec or L Hughes. What is so hard to understand about that?


Probably Nemec+Mercer…but I doubt either team is looking to do this sort of deal.

Garland-for-Severson (or similar) or even a Pearson-for-Walsh scenario all seem more fitting.
CEO a aimé ceci.
21 sept. 2022 à 0 h 17
#54
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,525
Mentions "j'aime": 668
Quoting: KingofRnR
Yes, they got a 1st + Very Good Prospect in Faber = 2 Pieces

I offered a 1st + 3rd + 1st/Mukhamadullin + a 2nd/Ohktiuk + 3rd(more like another late 1st/2nd now)/Thompson + Tatar as a replacement to make the $$$ work. As if, Severson for Hoglander isn't reasonable, considering VAN has tons of LW's and desperately needs help on D, especially on the right side. Severson is likely the Chiarot at this year's Trade Deadline, no!?

I see VAN Trading Pettersson before Quinn Hughes. Much harder to find a Stud Defensemen than a Left Shot C/LW


You act like Pettersson isn't a top 15 center. He is our 1C, and will be as long as he's on the team. Your package could get you Horvat, and you can negotiate your extension
theleano1 a aimé ceci.
21 sept. 2022 à 0 h 18
#55
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Probably Nemec+Mercer…but I doubt either team is looking to do this sort of deal.

Garland-for-Severson (or similar) or even a Pearson-for-Walsh scenario all seem more fitting.


Pearson for Walsh doesn't seem very good for New Jersey
theleano1 a aimé ceci.
21 sept. 2022 à 0 h 21
#56
Démarrer sujet
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 6,795
Mentions "j'aime": 1,835
Quoting: Juiceman
Pearson for Walsh doesn't seem very good for New Jersey

I Agree Juice, That'd be a Terrible Trade for NJD

Garland for Severson would be risky for VAN toio, would you even consider it? You'd only have Boeser and LW Kuzmenko as your only Right Shot Top-9 Forwards, is that ideal!?
21 sept. 2022 à 0 h 22
#57
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,130
Mentions "j'aime": 18,343
Quoting: Juiceman
Pearson for Walsh doesn't seem very good for New Jersey


It’s just what came to mind as lesser version of Sevs/Garland. Maybe it’s younger forward instead.

But you get the idea. A hockey trade. Winger for RD.
Juiceman a aimé ceci.
21 sept. 2022 à 0 h 23
#58
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: Juiceman
Pearson for Walsh doesn't seem very good for New Jersey


Why not? Pearson is a proven middle six winger and Walsh's ceiling is 3rd pair
21 sept. 2022 à 0 h 23
#59
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Why not? Pearson is a proven middle six winger and Walsh's ceiling is 3rd pair


Young RHD have a lot of value right now. Pearson is a solid player but not much trade value
21 sept. 2022 à 0 h 25
#60
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: Juiceman
Young RHD have a lot of value right now. Pearson is a solid player but not much trade value


RHD with top 4 upside have a lot of trade value you mean. You forgot to specify
21 sept. 2022 à 0 h 29
#61
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: Knuckl3s
RHD with top 4 upside have a lot of trade value you mean. You forgot to specify


Walsh is pretty good. Worse offensively than Rathbone, a bit better defensively. I wouldn't trade Rathbone for a middle six winger
21 sept. 2022 à 0 h 32
#62
Démarrer sujet
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 6,795
Mentions "j'aime": 1,835
Quoting: CEO
You act like Pettersson isn't a top 15 center. He is our 1C, and will be as long as he's on the team. Your package could get you Horvat, and you can negotiate your extension

Explain to me how a 1C places 4th in Team Faceoffs!? He's not even a 1C, he's a LW. Bo Horvat and JT Miller are your 1C's
21 sept. 2022 à 0 h 34
#63
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: KingofRnR
Explain to me how a 1C places 4th in Team Faceoffs!? He's not even a 1C, he's a LW. Bo Horvat and JT Miller are your 1C's


Faceoffs are not really that big of a deal. The Colorado Avalanche won the cup with the 4th worst faceoff win rate in the entire league during the regular season

Pettersson definitely is a 1C. Your argument is irrelevant
Knuckl3s, theleano1 et CEO a aimé ceci.
21 sept. 2022 à 0 h 41
#64
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: Juiceman
Walsh is pretty good. Worse offensively than Rathbone, a bit better defensively. I wouldn't trade Rathbone for a middle six winger


Walsh is a B-prospect in my book
21 sept. 2022 à 0 h 43
#65
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Walsh is a B-prospect in my book


I don't think many people outside of Vancouver would consider Rathbone an A-prospect but I still wouldn't trade him for Tanner Pearson
21 sept. 2022 à 0 h 43
#66
Démarrer sujet
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 6,795
Mentions "j'aime": 1,835
Modifié 21 sept. 2022 à 0 h 50
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Why not? Pearson is a proven middle six winger and Walsh's ceiling is 3rd pair

I think you randomly make ip these "ceilings" in your head and on the fly, you have absolutely no clue do you. Just a random guess statement so it fits your argument, Nice!

He's played well and put up 1st Pairing numbers everywhere he's played: https://www.capfriendly.com/players/reilly-walsh

I mean the guy walks in, plays 20 shifts and 14:30 minutes in his very 1st NHL Game, Blocks 2 Shots, Gets 3 Shot Attempts Assists in a Goal, Allows No Goals Against, Starts 60% of Faceoffs in his own D-Zone, yet had a CF% of 64.0. Only 1 game I know, but who steps in and does that, that's impressive
21 sept. 2022 à 0 h 44
#67
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: Juiceman
I don't think many people outside of Vancouver would consider Rathbone an A-prospect but I still wouldn't trade him for Tanner Pearson


I wouldn't either, but I would still take Rathbone over Walsh in a heartbeat
CEO a aimé ceci.
21 sept. 2022 à 0 h 44
#68
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: KingofRnR
I think you randomly make ip these "ceilings" in your head and on the fly, you have no absolutely clue do you. Just a random guess statement so it fits your argument, Nice!

He's played well and put up 1st Pairing numbers everywhere he's played: https://www.capfriendly.com/players/reilly-walsh

I mean the guy walks in, plays 20 shifts and 14:30 minutes in his very 1st NHL Game, Blocks 2 Shots, Gets 3 Shot Attempts Assists in a Goal, Allows No Goals Against, Starts 60% of Faceoffs in his own D-Zone, yet had a CF% of 64.0. Only 1 game I know, but who steps in and does that, that's imnoressive


Did you make up that final word? tears of joy

Cause if you didn't, please define it for me
21 sept. 2022 à 0 h 46
#69
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: KingofRnR
I think you randomly make ip these "ceilings" in your head and on the fly, you have absolutely no clue do you. Just a random guess statement so it fits your argument, Nice!

He's played well and put up 1st Pairing numbers everywhere he's played: https://www.capfriendly.com/players/reilly-walsh

I mean the guy walks in, plays 20 shifts and 14:30 minutes in his very 1st NHL Game, Blocks 2 Shots, Gets 3 Shot Attempts Assists in a Goal, Allows No Goals Against, Starts 60% of Faceoffs in his own D-Zone, yet had a CF% of 64.0. Only 1 game I know, but who steps in and does that, that's imnoressive


Its called having a good day. One game literally means nothing. What about all those fringe NHL goalies that just happen to get a shutout in their first game?
Knuckl3s a aimé ceci.
21 sept. 2022 à 0 h 49
#70
Démarrer sujet
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 6,795
Mentions "j'aime": 1,835
Quoting: Juiceman
Faceoffs are not really that big of a deal. The Colorado Avalanche won the cup with the 4th worst faceoff win rate in the entire league during the regular season

Pettersson definitely is a 1C. Your argument is irrelevant


So just because you two say so, that makes him a 1C now!? End of debate!? My question and the facts I provide are irrelevant!? Okay lol Petterss is not a 1C, he's not even the Vancouver Canucks 1C

FYI - Just to help you guys out, your 1C is the forward (you know, one of those 3 players up front, the guy in the middle) on the ice the majority of the time, taking a majority of the faceoffs.
21 sept. 2022 à 0 h 51
#71
PDG over PDO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 5,036
Mentions "j'aime": 4,096
Quoting: KingofRnR
Explain to me how a 1C places 4th in Team Faceoffs!? He's not even a 1C, he's a LW. Bo Horvat and JT Miller are your 1C's


Faceoff's ≠ Center gabriel landeskog had almost double the amount of faceoffs then Nathan MacKinnon and no one here is thinks Landeskog is Colorado's #1C
Juiceman, Knuckl3s et CEO a aimé ceci.
21 sept. 2022 à 0 h 52
#72
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: KingofRnR
So just because you two say so, that makes him a 1C now!? End of debate!? My question and the facts I provide are irrelevant!? Okay lol Petterss is not a 1C, he's not even the Vancouver Canucks 1C

FYI - Just to help you guys out, your 1C is the forward (you know, one of those 3 players up front, the guy in the middle) on the ice the majority of the time, taking a majority of the faceoffs.


Your only argument is that Pettersson isn't a 1C because he is not good at faceoffs. I guess that means MacKinnon is not a 1C either. He is also not good at faceoffs. Maybe provide a little more one why Pettersson can't play center except for a completely invalid argument that can easily be refuted
Knuckl3s a aimé ceci.
21 sept. 2022 à 1 h 2
#73
Démarrer sujet
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 6,795
Mentions "j'aime": 1,835
Quoting: theleano1
Faceoff's ≠ Center gabriel landeskog had almost double the amount of faceoffs then Nathan MacKinnon and no one here is thinks Landeskog is Colorado's #1C

That's Not True FakeNews Never Happened. Kadri took more faceoffs this season, but MacKinnon was injured and has been the past 3 seasons, but Landeskog has not taken more faceoffs than MacKinnon, certainly not double. Let's stick to the truth and facts here please
21 sept. 2022 à 1 h 4
#74
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: KingofRnR
That's Not True FakeNews Never Happened. Kadri took more faceoffs this season, but MacKinnon was injured and has been the past 3 seasons, but Landeskog has not taken more faceoffs than MacKinnon, certainly not double. Let's stick to the truth and facts here please


Still doesn't take away from the fact that MacKinnon is not good at faceoffs. Are you telling me Kadri was the 1C of the Avalanche?
Knuckl3s a aimé ceci.
21 sept. 2022 à 1 h 9
#75
Démarrer sujet
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 6,795
Mentions "j'aime": 1,835
Quoting: Juiceman
Your only argument is that Pettersson isn't a 1C because he is not good at faceoffs. I guess that means MacKinnon is not a 1C either. He is also not good at faceoffs. Maybe provide a little more one why Pettersson can't play center except for a completely invalid argument that can easily be refuted

Where did I ever say Pettersson can't play Center!?

You guys are making things up and saying I said or inferred something I never ever did. That's not very ethical behaviou.

I find myself surrounded by a bunch of Canuck bull manure here, so I'm gonna have to bid you guys adieu, since y'll really stinking up this place and make **** up
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage