SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Canucks get Bear Canes get LW depth to help replace Patches

Créé par: willdog37
Équipe: 2022-23 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 19 sept. 2022
Publié: 19 sept. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
1750 000 $
Transactions
CAR
  1. Pearson, Tanner
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (VAN)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de NYR
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2025
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $78 914 167 $1 250 000 $2 000 000 $3 585 833 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, C
UFA
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 260 000 $7 260 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
19 sept. 2022 à 16 h 21
#1
1GarthSnowFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 11,742
Mentions "j'aime": 4,803
Carolina doesn’t really need left wing depth lol. And certainly not at that price.
19 sept. 2022 à 16 h 22
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,513
Mentions "j'aime": 532
The Canes have no need for LW depth since they signed Stastny. They’re not taking on a cap dump in a trade for Bear.

Try again.
19 sept. 2022 à 16 h 23
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 499
Mentions "j'aime": 408
Quoting: spockrock
The Canes have no need for LW depth since they signed Stastny. They’re not taking on a cap dump in a trade for Bear.

Try again.


Pearson's actually good at hockey, not just a cap dump...Bear can't even crack the lineup
Juiceman, majormoose007, Knuckl3s and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
19 sept. 2022 à 16 h 24
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,513
Mentions "j'aime": 532
Quoting: willdog37
Pearson's actually good at hockey, not just a cap dump...Bear can't even crack the lineup


Pearson makes more than Bear and RD is a premium position. To CAR, he’s a cap dump.

Again, try again.
19 sept. 2022 à 16 h 29
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 499
Mentions "j'aime": 408
Quoting: spockrock
Pearson makes more than Bear and RD is a premium position. To CAR, he’s a cap dump.

Again, try again.


Wow you really think they'll get a 1st or 2nd rounder for a guy who might be non-tendered next summer...that's completely irrational
19 sept. 2022 à 16 h 30
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,513
Mentions "j'aime": 532
Quoting: willdog37
Wow you really think they'll get a 1st or 2nd rounder for a guy who might be non-tendered next summer...that's completely irrational


Please point out where I said he’d return a 1st or 2nd.

Time to use your reading comprehension skills there chief.
19 sept. 2022 à 16 h 37
#7
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: spockrock
Pearson makes more than Bear and RD is a premium position. To CAR, he’s a cap dump.

Again, try again.


Pearson makes more money because he is a better player. Shouldn't be a hard concept to grasp
willdog37, majormoose007 et Knuckl3s a aimé ceci.
19 sept. 2022 à 16 h 39
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,513
Mentions "j'aime": 532
Quoting: Juiceman
Pearson makes more money because he is a better player. Shouldn't be a hard concept to grasp


What benefit do the Canes get by trading Bear for a more expensive player that they have no need for?

That shouldn’t be too hard to grasp.
evelutions2 et squashmaple a aimé ceci.
19 sept. 2022 à 16 h 43
#9
Lets Get Kraken
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 8,612
Mentions "j'aime": 3,458
Quoting: willdog37
Pearson's actually good at hockey, not just a cap dump...Bear can't even crack the lineup


Considering he got taken out of the lineup due to injuries and Covid, you can’t exactly make that argument. Besides, Pearson is only good for about 40 points if you are lucky. Since he likely would be playing on the 4th line in Vancouver according to Daily Faceoff, he won’t even hit 40 this year. And for arguments sake, if he was sent to Carolina, he would either be on the 4th line or the 16F when Patches comes back. Canes can’t afford to tie up 3mil on a healthy scratch. So he is a cap dump, and Canes shoot this offer down instantly. Besides, Canes have no need for LW depth with the Stastny signing.
19 sept. 2022 à 16 h 43
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 499
Mentions "j'aime": 408
Quoting: spockrock
What benefit do the Canes get by trading Bear for a more expensive player that they have no need for?

That shouldn’t be too hard to grasp.


Injuries happen all the time. Having depth is a good thing for a team wanting to make a cup run. They have the space to take on an additional $1 million. The Canucks are giving up a draft pick for the Canes to take on that space (if you want to bump it to a 2nd, fine). I fail to see how this trade hurts the Canes at all.
19 sept. 2022 à 16 h 49
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,513
Mentions "j'aime": 532
Quoting: willdog37
Injuries happen all the time. Having depth is a good thing for a team wanting to make a cup run. They have the space to take on an additional $1 million. The Canucks are giving up a draft pick for the Canes to take on that space (if you want to bump it to a 2nd, fine). I fail to see how this trade hurts the Canes at all.


They don’t really have the space, even with Gardiner to LTIR, they can barely fit Pacioretty in when he’s ready. That’s w/o the headache of finding a place for Pearson to pay then and now on top of having to clear $1M in space to activate Pacioretty in February. They don’t have to do anything if they keep Bear.

Taking on Pearson at $3M plus a pick gives them zero incentive to make a deal with Vancouver. Just send a pick and the Canucks will have to sort out their cap issues on their own.
19 sept. 2022 à 17 h 16
#12
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: spockrock
Pearson makes more than Bear and RD is a premium position. To CAR, he’s a cap dump.

Again, try again.


Pearson > Bear, don't be ridiculous
19 sept. 2022 à 17 h 17
#13
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: evelutions2
Considering he got taken out of the lineup due to injuries and Covid, you can’t exactly make that argument. Besides, Pearson is only good for about 40 points if you are lucky. Since he likely would be playing on the 4th line in Vancouver according to Daily Faceoff, he won’t even hit 40 this year. And for arguments sake, if he was sent to Carolina, he would either be on the 4th line or the 16F when Patches comes back. Canes can’t afford to tie up 3mil on a healthy scratch. So he is a cap dump, and Canes shoot this offer down instantly. Besides, Canes have no need for LW depth with the Stastny signing.


Pearson is a perennial 40 point player, there is no "luck" to it
19 sept. 2022 à 17 h 22
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 1,406
Mentions "j'aime": 961
Canucks will probably pick up a RHD after rosters are set and waivers are going on.

I would not give up much for Bear maybe a 4 th or 5 th only. He is another Troy Stecher and they are not that difficult to find.
Knuckl3s a aimé ceci.
19 sept. 2022 à 17 h 38
#15
Lets Get Kraken
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 8,612
Mentions "j'aime": 3,458
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Pearson is a perennial 40 point player, there is no "luck" to it


Yes because hitting 40 points 3 times in 9 seasons where he played in the regular season is “perennial”. Sure buddy.
fullblowncaniac90 a aimé ceci.
19 sept. 2022 à 17 h 39
#16
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: evelutions2
Yes because hitting 40 points 3 times in 9 seasons where he played in the regular season is “perennial”. Sure buddy.


Looks like a pretty reasonable track record to me, considering the player has bounced around a little bit plus endured the covid seasons
19 sept. 2022 à 17 h 42
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,513
Mentions "j'aime": 532
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Pearson > Bear, don't be ridiculous


Where would he play in CAR’s lineup? Why would they trade a cheaper RD for a more expensive player they don’t need?

Don’t be ridiculous.
19 sept. 2022 à 17 h 43
#18
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: spockrock
Where would he play in CAR’s lineup? Why would they trade a cheaper RD for a more expensive player they don’t need?

Don’t be ridiculous.


Pearson would take the 3LW spot over Stastny
19 sept. 2022 à 17 h 44
#19
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Pearson would take the 3LW spot over Stastny


Doubt it. Statsny>Pearson
19 sept. 2022 à 17 h 45
#20
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: Juiceman
Doubt it. Statsny>Pearson


LMAO, are you kidding me??? Pearson is much younger than Stastny
19 sept. 2022 à 17 h 46
#21
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: Knuckl3s
LMAO, are you kidding me??? Pearson is much younger than Stastny


When did I mention age? It isn't like either of them would be staying long term in Carolina anyway
19 sept. 2022 à 17 h 46
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,513
Mentions "j'aime": 532
Quoting: Knuckl3s
LMAO, are you kidding me??? Pearson is much younger than Stastny


Stastny has vastly outperformed Pearson, even with his age. He’s more versatile and signed for half the price.

Try again.
19 sept. 2022 à 17 h 47
#23
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: Juiceman
When did I mention age? It isn't like either of them would be staying long term in Carolina anyway


Maybe not, but with Stastny there is a major age related risk factor. That risk doesn't exist with Pearson, hence why he makes more money
19 sept. 2022 à 17 h 48
#24
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: spockrock
Stastny has vastly outperformed Pearson, even with his age. He’s more versatile and signed for half the price.

Try again.


How did he outperform Pearson? They scored at about the same pace last year. The only reason Stastny costs half as much is because he's older
19 sept. 2022 à 17 h 49
#25
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: Knuckl3s
How did he outperform Pearson? They scored at about the same pace last year. The only reason Stastny costs half as much is because he's older


Stastny 21 goals 45 points. Pearson isn't taking his spot
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage