Forums/Armchair-GM

lundkvist outside the box

Créé par: zk97
Date de création initiale: 13 sept. 2022
Publié: 13 sept. 2022
Équipe: 2022-23 Canadiens de Montréal
Transactions
MTL
  1. Lundkvist, Nils
NYR
  1. Pitlick, Rem
  2. Choix de 2023 ronde en 5e (CGY)
Rachats de contrats
  • Karl Alzner: 833 333 $
ANNÉE DE REPÊCHAGE1E RONDE2E RONDE3E RONDE4E RONDE5E RONDE6E RONDE7E RONDE
2023
Logo de MTL
Logo de FLA
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de PIT
Logo de VGK
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
2024
Logo de MTL
Logo de COL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de EDM
2025
Logo de MTL
Logo de CGY
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
Logo de MTL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2282 500 000 $79 439 166 $1 132 500 $2 207 500 $3 060 834 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
Monahan, Sean
6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
Suzuki, Nick
7 875 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
Caufield, Cole
880 833 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
Drouin, Jonathan
5 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
Dvorak, Christian
4 450 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
Gallagher, Brendan
6 500 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
Dadonov, Evgeni
5 000 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
Dach, Kirby
3 362 500 $
C, AD
RFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
Anderson, Josh
5 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
Hoffman, Mike
4 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
Evans, Jake
1 700 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
Armia, Joel
3 400 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
Byron, Paul
3 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
Matheson, Michael
4 875 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
Savard, David
3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
Allen, Jake
2 875 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
Edmundson, Joel
3 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
Lundkvist, Nils
925 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
Montembeault, Samuel
1 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
Harris, Jordan
842 500 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
Schueneman, Corey
750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
Wideman, Chris
762 500 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
Price, Carey
10 500 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 4

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
13 sept. 2022 à 16 h 32
#1
NoQuitInNewYork
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,663
Mentions "j'aime": 551
IMO. Habs won’t trade Pitlick.
13 sept. 2022 à 16 h 34
#2
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 1,884
Mentions "j'aime": 441
Might work, NYR might want a 3rd or 4th RD Pick, but it's probably close
13 sept. 2022 à 16 h 48
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 14,035
Mentions "j'aime": 5,156
Habs should do it
I know Pitlick worked out pretty good, but you got to give to receive
Anyway MTL have too many forwards, this would make sense for both teams
KingofRnR a aimé ceci.
13 sept. 2022 à 17 h 50
#4
Not_Isles5513
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 10,497
Mentions "j'aime": 4,230
Quoting: KingofRnR
Might work, NYR might want a 3rd or 4th RD Pick, but it's probably close


Rangers want a young top 9 center prospect. This ain’t it.
13 sept. 2022 à 17 h 57
#5
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 1,884
Mentions "j'aime": 441
Quoting: Isles5513
Rangers want a young top 9 center prospect. This ain’t it.

I wouldn't discount Rem Pitlick, he out-performed Filip Chytil last season and the Flames Adam Ruzicka likely would too
13 sept. 2022 à 18 h 1
#6
Not_Isles5513
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 10,497
Mentions "j'aime": 4,230
Quoting: KingofRnR
I wouldn't discount Rem Pitlick, he out-performed Filip Chytil last season and the Flames Adam Ruzicka likely would too


Chytil was great in the playoffs after a very average regular season. The other issue is that Pitlick literally wasn’t qualified. Why would they trade a valuable asset for that guy?
13 sept. 2022 à 18 h 46
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 11,582
Mentions "j'aime": 4,248
Quoting: Isles5513
Chytil was great in the playoffs after a very average regular season. The other issue is that Pitlick literally wasn’t qualified. Why would they trade a valuable asset for that guy?


You don't realize how NHL RFA contracts work do you?! Rem was not qualified because if we had given him a QO he would have been arbitration eligible. By not qualifying him we were able to negotiate from a position of strength.
13 sept. 2022 à 18 h 51
#8
Not_Isles5513
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 10,497
Mentions "j'aime": 4,230
Quoting: Campabee
You don't realize how NHL RFA contracts work do you?! Rem was not qualified because if we had given him a QO he would have been arbitration eligible. By not qualifying him we were able to negotiate from a position of strength.


Ofc IK that. But the rangers could’ve swept in and signed him, but they didn’t. The idea you are getting a former first round pick who is under control for Rem Pitlick is beyond ridiculous.
13 sept. 2022 à 21 h 9
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 11,582
Mentions "j'aime": 4,248
Quoting: Isles5513
Ofc IK that. But the rangers could’ve swept in and signed him, but they didn’t. The idea you are getting a former first round pick who is under control for Rem Pitlick is beyond ridiculous.


I was just commenting on why he wasn't qualified not the value cause obviously like you said Rem doesn't have that kind of value unless we are attaching a 2nd or 3rd round pick as well.
13 sept. 2022 à 21 h 18
#10
Not_Isles5513
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 10,497
Mentions "j'aime": 4,230
Quoting: Campabee
I was just commenting on why he wasn't qualified not the value cause obviously like you said Rem doesn't have that kind of value unless we are attaching a 2nd or 3rd round pick as well.


Oh my bad lol
13 sept. 2022 à 23 h 26
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 11,582
Mentions "j'aime": 4,248
Quoting: Isles5513
Oh my bad lol


No worries
14 sept. 2022 à 10 h 26
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 14,035
Mentions "j'aime": 5,156
Quoting: Isles5513
Ofc IK that. But the rangers could’ve swept in and signed him, but they didn’t. The idea you are getting a former first round pick who is under control for Rem Pitlick is beyond ridiculous.


Pitlcik said he wasn’t signing with any other team, he was just waiting on Hughes to make room for him (Petry trade)
Not_Isles5513 a aimé ceci.
14 sept. 2022 à 11 h 55
#13
Not_Isles5513
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 10,497
Mentions "j'aime": 4,230
Quoting: GMs
Pitlcik said he wasn’t signing with any other team, he was just waiting on Hughes to make room for him (Petry trade)


Either way the trade doesn’t work for NYR
14 sept. 2022 à 12 h 17
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 14,035
Mentions "j'aime": 5,156
Quoting: Isles5513
Either way the trade doesn’t work for NYR


Yes it does, they get a young C/LW making 1.1M for another year
They get better this year and they have a good 3rd liner for 1.1M
14 sept. 2022 à 12 h 19
#15
Not_Isles5513
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 10,497
Mentions "j'aime": 4,230
Quoting: GMs
Yes it does, they get a young C/LW making 1.1M for another year
They get better this year and they have a good 3rd liner for 1.1M


It’s not remotely fair to the rangers. Look I’m sorry man, but there is no world where this deal works from NYR’s perspective. Pretending otherwise is ridiculous tbh.
14 sept. 2022 à 13 h 20
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 14,035
Mentions "j'aime": 5,156
Quoting: Isles5513
It’s not remotely fair to the rangers. Look I’m sorry man, but there is no world where this deal works from NYR’s perspective. Pretending otherwise is ridiculous tbh.


In your opinion and your opinion looks like saying Lehkonen is better than McDavid and pretending otherwise is ridiculous. That’s how your opinion looks like
14 sept. 2022 à 13 h 49
#17
Not_Isles5513
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 10,497
Mentions "j'aime": 4,230
Quoting: GMs
In your opinion and your opinion looks like saying Lehkonen is better than McDavid and pretending otherwise is ridiculous. That’s how your opinion looks like


That’s terrible grammar lol. All I said is Lundkvist is more valuable than a guy who was a UFA and was placed on waivers multiple times last year. Whatever man.
14 sept. 2022 à 15 h 55
#18
Démarrer sujet
juraj son of juraj
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 14,942
Mentions "j'aime": 7,953
Quoting: Isles5513
That’s terrible grammar lol. All I said is Lundkvist is more valuable than a guy who was a UFA and was placed on waivers multiple times last year. Whatever man.


he went on waivers twice, but when he finally found a home, he thrived. 37 pts in 60-something games iirc. sure he wont replicate that but hes gonna be an effective bottom six guy. getting a pick on top of that for a guy who wants out isnt bad at all considering his value would be at an all time low
14 sept. 2022 à 15 h 58
#19
Not_Isles5513
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 10,497
Mentions "j'aime": 4,230
Quoting: Zuki9797
he went on waivers twice, but when he finally found a home, he thrived. 37 pts in 60-something games iirc. sure he wont replicate that but hes gonna be an effective bottom six guy. getting a pick on top of that for a guy who wants out isnt bad at all considering his value would be at an all time low


He was a former first round pick who had very high value just a year ago. You are underestimating his “all time low” by a laughable degree lol.
20 sept. 2022 à 9 h 23
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 1,898
Mentions "j'aime": 785
Good thing Habs stayed away!! 1st rounder in 2023 lmao for a prospect that asked out and is that small with question marks! Talk about buying high when Nill should have been buying low!
zk97 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage