SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Oilers - Subban - Sprong

Créé par: JaXon
Équipe: 2022-23 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 6 sept. 2022
Publié: 6 sept. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Subban - Sprong
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 175 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
2815 000 $
32 750 000 $
Transactions
1.
EDM
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
MTL
  1. Barrie, Tyson
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
2.
EDM
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2024 (ANA)
ANA
  1. Foegele, Warren
  2. Choix de 6e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2024
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de ANA
2025
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $81 354 333 $896 000 $2 200 000 $1 145 667 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 175 000 $1 175 000 $
C
RFA - 1
815 000 $815 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
RFA - 2
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 167 000 $4 167 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
G
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 sept. 2022 à 10 h 52
#1
Go Habs Go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2021
Messages: 1,956
Mentions "j'aime": 459
I think you will need to pay more to dump Tyson. Flames paid a 1st rd and Monahan to get rid of him. I would see a 2nd rd pick going the Habs way and no 7th going to Oilers
6 sept. 2022 à 10 h 52
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 1,664
Mentions "j'aime": 1,001
Montreal isn't going to take on Barrie's contract without sending a Hoffman or Armia the other way. There are far cheaper ways to get a RD.
Just_A_Guess a aimé ceci.
6 sept. 2022 à 11 h 13
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,003
Mentions "j'aime": 7,734
I can't see Subban getting that much money or term. If you gave him a more reasonable contract you could keep Foegele.
6 sept. 2022 à 11 h 15
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,003
Mentions "j'aime": 7,734
I'm also not a fan of moving Barrie, especially if it's going to cost assets. In the past 2 seasons he has scored 129, 15-74-89, good for 10th in the league and an 82 game average of 57 points. His on-ice goal differential at 5v5 in that span was 108-95 (+13), and in the playoffs he posted 16-9 goals. There's no urgency to get rid of him, and paying to move him is ridiculous.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
6 sept. 2022 à 11 h 32
#5
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,198
Mentions "j'aime": 25,116
Why would Anaheim be interested in two years of a 26-year-old third liner when we have young prospects to develop? Especially left-handed ones.
6 sept. 2022 à 11 h 32
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 218
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Quoting: CD282
I'm also not a fan of moving Barrie, especially if it's going to cost assets. In the past 2 seasons he has scored 129, 15-74-89, good for 10th in the league and an 82 game average of 57 points. His on-ice goal differential at 5v5 in that span was 108-95 (+13), and in the playoffs he posted 16-9 goals. There's no urgency to get rid of him, and paying to move him is ridiculous.


I don't think the Oilers can get under cap by just trading Foegele. Even Foegele and Ryan doesn't get them under cap. And I don't think they'll do Foegele and one of Puljujarvi or Yamamoto. So then it has to be Barrie.
6 sept. 2022 à 11 h 55
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 218
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Quoting: BadaBing
I think you will need to pay more to dump Tyson. Flames paid a 1st rd and Monahan to get rid of him. I would see a 2nd rd pick going the Habs way and no 7th going to Oilers


Quoting: Burnout
Montreal isn't going to take on Barrie's contract without sending a Hoffman or Armia the other way. There are far cheaper ways to get a RD.


Barrie led the NHL D in scoring in 2020-21, and scored 41 pts last season. Montreal had one of the worst PPs in the NHL last season. They also had one of the lowest scoring D corps. And they've lost Petry since then. The Habs need some production from their blue. This isn't a player who is facing career-threatening injuries who hasn't scored in recent years. this is a bonafide offensive D. And Barrie's $4.5M contract is very reasonable. It's not a dump.
6 sept. 2022 à 12 h 1
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,003
Mentions "j'aime": 7,734
Quoting: JaXon
I don't think the Oilers can get under cap by just trading Foegele. Even Foegele and Ryan doesn't get them under cap. And I don't think they'll do Foegele and one of Puljujarvi or Yamamoto. So then it has to be Barrie.

Sure they can. It's been demonstrated on this site many times.
6 sept. 2022 à 12 h 6
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 218
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Quoting: CD282
Sure they can. It's been demonstrated on this site many times.


Yes, but they need to be $896,000 under cap because of their bonus overage penalty from last season. They can't be at 0 cap space. They need to have $896,000 in cap space.

I don't think people are accounting for that.
6 sept. 2022 à 12 h 11
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,003
Mentions "j'aime": 7,734
Quoting: JaXon
Yes, but they need to be $896,000 under cap because of their bonus overage penalty from last season. They can't be at 0 cap space. They need to have $896,000 in cap space.

I don't think people are accounting for that.


Capfriendly already included it in their calculations. You're counting it twice. Do the math: the $81,254,333 cap hit listed above includes the bonus overages on the next line. No need to leave $1.25M in cap space like you've done.
6 sept. 2022 à 12 h 17
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 282
Mentions "j'aime": 135
Quoting: JaXon
Barrie led the NHL D in scoring in 2020-21, and scored 41 pts last season. Montreal had one of the worst PPs in the NHL last season. They also had one of the lowest scoring D corps. And they've lost Petry since then. The Habs need some production from their blue. This isn't a player who is facing career-threatening injuries who hasn't scored in recent years. this is a bonafide offensive D. And Barrie's $4.5M contract is very reasonable. It's not a dump.


Habs can't make that deal...it puts them above the 10% for offseason.
6 sept. 2022 à 12 h 32
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 1,664
Mentions "j'aime": 1,001
Quoting: JaXon
Barrie led the NHL D in scoring in 2020-21, and scored 41 pts last season. Montreal had one of the worst PPs in the NHL last season. They also had one of the lowest scoring D corps. And they've lost Petry since then. The Habs need some production from their blue. This isn't a player who is facing career-threatening injuries who hasn't scored in recent years. this is a bonafide offensive D. And Barrie's $4.5M contract is very reasonable. It's not a dump.


As Montreal is rebuilding, they don't need anything on D outside of a guy that helps ensure their younger guys aren't thrown in the deep end. And considering Barrie already needs to be sheltered 5v5, it doesn't make much sense. Barrie also isn't going to pump that kind of PP production without a McDavid and Draisaitl. And, again, Montreal is rebuilding, an empty calorie point producing D doesn't help them now or in the future.

Its fine if you don't think Barrie is a dump. That doesn't mean he's a fit for Montreal unless they're sending money back the other way. And Hoffman and Armia are the only guys that really make sense for Montreal to send.

If Montreal really wants a veteran RD, they'll go after a UFA or a guy on an expiring deal.
6 sept. 2022 à 13 h 26
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 218
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Quoting: CD282
Capfriendly already included it in their calculations. You're counting it twice. Do the math: the $81,254,333 cap hit listed above includes the bonus overages on the next line. No need to leave $1.25M in cap space like you've done.


Dang... oops. But now that I know that, I still can't get under cap by just trading Foegele. Not even if you use the cheapest options for open roster spots. I put Benson ($750k), and one of McKegg, Griffith, or Malone (@762.5k) on forward. And I have Murray ($750k), and Samorukov ($775k) on D. It's still $276,833 over cap. If you bury Ryan, you can get just under cap if you use cheap options only with Benson and 2 of Malone, McKegg, or Griffith. That really limits what you can do during the season. You can't even call up Shore, or Koekkoek if you need to, or Bourgault if he earns it. Even if you trade Ryan for nothing, that doesn't give you room to call up who you want to. You wouldn't be able to call up both Koekkoek and Shore at the same time as that would put you at least $51k over.

It seems like you have to trade Barrie to get under the cap. Then sign Subban who actually had better underlying numbers and more 5v5 points than Barrie last season on a terrible team (who knew?). Either that, or trade one of the young kids (Puljujarvi or Yamamoto), but that barely does it either. You'd have to trade one of them and Ryan to get any wiggle room to be able to freely call up players during the season. and I think that might be losing some future and making a new hole. Whereas paying Barrie $4.5M to play 3rd pair and have his PP time taken by Bouchard doesn't make sense. Especially when Subban's numbers are better than Barrie's.
6 sept. 2022 à 13 h 41
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,003
Mentions "j'aime": 7,734
Quoting: JaXon
Dang... oops. But now that I know that, I still can't get under cap by just trading Foegele. Not even if you use the cheapest options for open roster spots. I put Benson ($750k), and one of McKegg, Griffith, or Malone (762.5k) on forward. And I have Murray ($750k), and Samorukov ($775k) on D. It's still $276,833 over cap. If you bury Ryan, you can get just under cap if you use cheap options only with Benson and 2 of Malone, McKegg, or Griffith. That really limits what you can do during the season. You can't even call up Shore, or Koekkoek if you need to, or Bourgault if he earns it. Even if you trade Ryan for nothing, that doesn't give you room to call up who you want to. You wouldn't be able to call up both Koekkoek and Shore at the same time as that would put you at least $51k over.

It seems like you have to trade Barrie to get under the cap. Then sign Subban who actually had better underlying numbers and more 5v5 points than Barrie last season on a terrible team (who knew?). Either that, or trade one of the young kids (Puljujarvi or Yamamoto), but that barely does it either. You'd have to trade one of them and Ryan to get any wiggle room to be able to freely call up players during the season. and I think that might be losing some future and making a new hole. Whereas paying Barrie $4.5M to play 3rd pair and have his PP time taken by Bouchard doesn't make sense. Especially when Subban's numbers are better than Barrie's.


I just made a team this morning that was cap compliant with just moving Foegele, so it's definitely possible. And I doubt Koekkoek plays this year, unless you have specific information otherwise?
6 sept. 2022 à 14 h 18
#15
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 218
Mentions "j'aime": 19
Quoting: CD282
I just made a team this morning that was cap compliant with just moving Foegele, so it's definitely possible. And I doubt Koekkoek plays this year, unless you have specific information otherwise?


I'd like to see it. What did you sign McLeod for? I have him at $1,175,000. Maybe that's a bit high. Ryan and McLeod are on your roster? What about Holloway?
6 sept. 2022 à 15 h 7
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,003
Mentions "j'aime": 7,734
Quoting: JaXon
I'd like to see it. What did you sign McLeod for? I have him at $1,175,000. Maybe that's a bit high. Ryan and McLeod are on your roster? What about Holloway?


Here's one from today (not mine): https://www.capfriendly.com/forums/thread/636960
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage