Quoting: Hockeyfan1234
It’s a position of strength that you’re weakening for the sake of destroying our two best defensive prospects. It makes zero sense. Not only are you losing Ruhwedel for basically nothing here. But you’re also sending Friedman through waivers who probably would get picked up. So now our position of strength once again becomes a position of weakness and you really didn’t strengthen the team elsewhere. All you did was jerk around 3 of the teams prospects. Nothing good comes of having prospects just sit in the press box. What would be the point of the Ahl if that was the case? Nothing good comes of playing two prospects on a rotation. Guys who need time so they can get chemistry and gel.
Sending smith down to the Ahl does nothing to the time of the RD prospects cause Smith is a LD. And since the team doesn’t really have any LD worth a damn outside of Pickering (Who is at minimum 3 years away and going back to juniors) he and WBS could use him to play top line and PP minutes. POJ won’t be sent down cause he isn’t waivers exempt and would be claimed for sure. DOC wouldn’t be taking time away from guys like Poulin, Legare, Hallander, Puustinen, Svejkovsky, or Glover as DOC plays left wing and those guys are centers or RW. It would make more sense to make Nylander the 13th forward since he isn’t waiver exempt and could hop into the top 9 when injuries occur.
You’re right sometimes players do have to sit in the press box. They are called depth defensemen or guys who have had a handful of bad games in a row. Not top prospects for the sake of having them up when they are waiver exempt and need playing time.
We can go about this all night but I am just going to have to agree to disagree with you.
RD is not weakening by trading Ruhwedel. Letang, Petry, Rutta and Freidman (who by the way, would not get claimed after training camp when all other teams are having to send down similar like players on waivers in the flat cap period) are a completely solid bunch. I get it, some people don't like the Rutta contract but he is a perfectly capable third paring defenseman who comes from a championship winning organization that could defend leads. I am fan of Ruhwedel but something has to give with all these defensemen and it doesn't mean keeping Smith in the AHL. Ruhwedel is great but you are really acting like the sky is falling by moving him and not seeing the surplus of RD.
I keep repeating myself, there is nothing to gain with those player spending a majority of their time in the AHL. It is time to for them stay up with the NHL club, going through those routines and adding that infusion of youth this team would need and yes that may comes with some occasional press box time - sue me. No one is "getting destroyed" by this. If they perform poorly then by all means, send them down.
In the grand scheme, having a player down in the AHL who shouldn't be there takes up a spot in the lineup. This moves others down who should be getting AHL time. Poulin got moved to C because of poor performance/needing time there to learn the game - this has been reported. He is a LW and needs to spend time there this year after improving as a player at C. You may be overvaluing Joseph a bit too - management is not exactly enamored with him.
Nylander as the 13th forward is a joke, I do not understand the some of the fans' fascination with him. Probably because of his last name. Puustinen is also NHL ready and is way ahead of Nylander but falls victim to the depth at RW.