SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

klingberg trades

Créé par: dickie_boon
Équipe: 2022-23 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 31 juill. 2022
Publié: 29 août 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
NOTE: in the canucks trade klingberg is retained forgot to add and all at the deadline
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Klingberg, John
13 500 000 $
Klingberg, John
13 500 000 $
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Gabrielsson, Hugo [Liste de réserve]
  2. Pearson, Tanner
  3. Rathbone, Jack
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (VAN)
VAN
  1. Klingberg, John
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (MIN)
Détails additionnels:
i dont see this happening but if the canucks are doing really well they might do this?
2.
ANA
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (SJS)
SJS
  1. Pearson, Tanner (1 525 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (ANA)
Détails additionnels:
pt two of canucks
3.
ANA
  1. Brännström, Erik [Droits de RFA]
  2. O'Neill, Cameron [Liste de réserve]
  3. Zaitsev, Nikita
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (OTT)
OTT
  1. Klingberg, John
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2024 (ANA)
4.
ANA
  1. Svechkov, Fedor [Liste de réserve]
  2. Tolvanen, Eeli
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (NSH)
NSH
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (ANA)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (ANA)
5.
ANA
  1. Knies, Matthew [Liste de réserve]
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (TOR)
TOR
  1. Comtois, Maxime
Détails additionnels:
pt two of nashville trade
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de ANA
Logo de VAN
Logo de OTT
Logo de NSH
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de COL
Logo de TOR
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2024
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2025
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de SJS
Logo de TOR
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2482 500 000 $60 895 417 $0 $4 200 000 $21 604 583 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 650 000 $3 650 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 295 000 $1 295 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
425 000 $425 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Klingberg, John
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
762 500 $762 500 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
29 août 2022 à 13 h 22
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 9,687
Mentions "j'aime": 4,536
I think TOR is probably the only realistic team mentioned that I could see going after Kilngberg at the deadline. Not sure if that trade works because of money, but we obviously have to wait in see what kind of position they're in by then.

EDIT: Sorry, completely misread everything.
29 août 2022 à 13 h 23
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 1,631
Mentions "j'aime": 531
SJ doesn't need/want Pearson
29 août 2022 à 13 h 23
#3
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 9,687
Mentions "j'aime": 4,536
I don't think OTT makes much sense. While they're better this year, they're still exiting a rebuild and I can't see them moving top futures for a rental just yet.
29 août 2022 à 13 h 25
#4
I hate this team
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 981
Mentions "j'aime": 979
canucks pass
Warpbox et Knuckl3s a aimé ceci.
29 août 2022 à 13 h 30
#5
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Canucks pass easily. You want us to give up our second best prospect and a 2023 first round pick for a guy we could have gotten for free? EASY PASS
palhal, Warpbox, Knuckl3s and 2 others a aimé ceci.
29 août 2022 à 13 h 37
#6
Amirov Forever
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 6,548
Mentions "j'aime": 6,032
Leafs dont do Knies for Comtois straight up
palhal et Logan_Ollivier a aimé ceci.
29 août 2022 à 13 h 44
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 1,483
Mentions "j'aime": 453
Leafs wont do that deal, they give up some picks and a Solid prospect for a player who is expiring and has only hit over 10 goals in a season once.

What is going on in the NSH trade I am confused.
29 août 2022 à 13 h 50
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 1,668
Mentions "j'aime": 772
Quoting: Mr_Gardoki
I don't think OTT makes much sense. While they're better this year, they're still exiting a rebuild and I can't see them moving top futures for a rental just yet.


Ott was in on him in the first place and they really could use him, he would be a great pairing with either Chabot or Sanderson. As you mention thou they are not moving the package above unless there is an extension coming with it, and at a lower AAV than $7 per.

Now if the season is half way done or more and branstrom has not made top 4 minutes full time then I could see them rolling the dice on him without the 1st. Especially if Zaitsev is part of the deal.
Mr_Gardoki a aimé ceci.
29 août 2022 à 14 h 7
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 254
Mentions "j'aime": 115
What in the world is that Nashville trade??
29 août 2022 à 14 h 8
#10
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 9,687
Mentions "j'aime": 4,536
Quoting: NDoody
Ott was in on him in the first place and they really could use him, he would be a great pairing with either Chabot or Sanderson. As you mention thou they are not moving the package above unless there is an extension coming with it, and at a lower AAV than $7 per.

Now if the season is half way done or more and branstrom has not made top 4 minutes full time then I could see them rolling the dice on him without the 1st. Especially if Zaitsev is part of the deal.


Oh yeah, I know they wanted him, but yeah, they're not giving up that package. Personally? I don't think you guys should get him. Dmen who an score or drive offense isn't an issue for you. Dmen who can help stop goals is an issue. I think you guys should be targeting different guys.
29 août 2022 à 14 h 25
#11
LosPatos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 3,324
Mentions "j'aime": 1,844
These are all over the place
29 août 2022 à 14 h 29
#12
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 9,740
Mentions "j'aime": 6,495
Quoting: Juiceman
Canucks pass easily. You want us to give up our second best prospect and a 2023 first round pick for a guy we could have gotten for free? EASY PASS


Lets be real, no, you couldn't have, you never had the cap space to be in the hunt for him. That's why we would be retaining 50% of his salary when we flip him to you (in the description of this ACGM)

To the OP, lets break down these deals. Ducks will expect a 1st and a good (not great) prospect in return for Klingberg with 50% retention. Any salary coming back has to be an expiring contract or its a cap dump and requires more to get done. We also need to adress needs with this trade, bottom 9 right wing, right handed centers, right handed D, absolutely no left handed players unless it is a top 6 capable winger to put on the Terry Zegras line, so they should be of the power forward, net front chaos causing persuasion.

Ottowa: Ducks need more to take on Zaitsev's deal than this returns. The best prospect coming back is LD, which is absolutely the worst position to bring back with the deal. Jarventie, Pinto, Ostapchuk, Bernard-Docker, and Thomson would be targets.

Cannucks: Two LD prospects, one who is probably an AHL lifer, and an old LW to make the money work, this isn't the deal. Pearson is the logical candidate for the dump, but he has term that I don't like and we are way overstaffed at middle six left handed guys. Prospect targets would be Juulsen, Lockwood, Karlsson. I don't really see any reason the sharks want Pearsson, even with retention, so I don't think that makes sense. Our third needs to stay put in this deal. Cannucks are incredibly unlikely to do this, as they have spent years depleting their farm system and trading away 1st round picks, which their GM has stated they cannot afford to do anymore.

Predators: Undersized 1st round bust LW, LH Russian pivot who hasn't played the NA game yet, again wrong selections. Targets should be Glass, L'Heureux, Afanasyev, Evangelista, Fabbro, Carrier, Prokop, Matier.

I'm really not sure what you are doing with that Toronto deal as "part two" Since it involves none of the pieces involved, other than to tie in we are getting a NHL current winger from the Preds, but he is no Comtois replacement. I don't think Toronto is interested in the deal either, unless they free up roster space, they can't take Comtois, they already don't have enough to sign Sandin.
29 août 2022 à 14 h 36
#13
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
Lets be real, no, you couldn't have, you never had the cap space to be in the hunt for him. That's why we would be retaining 50% of his salary when we flip him to you (in the description of this ACGM)

To the OP, lets break down these deals. Ducks will expect a 1st and a good (not great) prospect in return for Klingberg with 50% retention. Any salary coming back has to be an expiring contract or its a cap dump and requires more to get done. We also need to adress needs with this trade, bottom 9 right wing, right handed centers, right handed D, absolutely no left handed players unless it is a top 6 capable winger to put on the Terry Zegras line, so they should be of the power forward, net front chaos causing persuasion.

Ottowa: Ducks need more to take on Zaitsev's deal than this returns. The best prospect coming back is LD, which is absolutely the worst position to bring back with the deal. Jarventie, Pinto, Ostapchuk, Bernard-Docker, and Thomson would be targets.

Cannucks: Two LD prospects, one who is probably an AHL lifer, and an old LW to make the money work, this isn't the deal. Pearson is the logical candidate for the dump, but he has term that I don't like and we are way overstaffed at middle six left handed guys. Prospect targets would be Juulsen, Lockwood, Karlsson. I don't really see any reason the sharks want Pearsson, even with retention, so I don't think that makes sense. Our third needs to stay put in this deal. Cannucks are incredibly unlikely to do this, as they have spent years depleting their farm system and trading away 1st round picks, which their GM has stated they cannot afford to do anymore.

Predators: Undersized 1st round bust LW, LH Russian pivot who hasn't played the NA game yet, again wrong selections. Targets should be Glass, L'Heureux, Afanasyev, Evangelista, Fabbro, Carrier, Prokop, Matier.

I'm really not sure what you are doing with that Toronto deal as "part two" Since it involves none of the pieces involved, other than to tie in we are getting a NHL current winger from the Preds, but he is no Comtois replacement. I don't think Toronto is interested in the deal either, unless they free up roster space, they can't take Comtois, they already don't have enough to sign Sandin.


Canucks arent paying assets for a rental d man. They werent even interested in Klingberg to begin with. We are selling, not buying
Knuckl3s et majormoose007 a aimé ceci.
29 août 2022 à 14 h 40
#14
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 9,740
Mentions "j'aime": 6,495
Quoting: NDoody
Ott was in on him in the first place and they really could use him, he would be a great pairing with either Chabot or Sanderson. As you mention thou they are not moving the package above unless there is an extension coming with it, and at a lower AAV than $7 per.

Now if the season is half way done or more and branstrom has not made top 4 minutes full time then I could see them rolling the dice on him without the 1st. Especially if Zaitsev is part of the deal.


If Zaitsev is part of the deal and the 1st is out, there's going to need to be some multiple blue chip prospects at positions of need for the Ducks. Pick one from each pair (Greig or Jarventie) + (Bernard-Docker or Thomson) and probably toss in a bottom six right handed forward such as Kastelic, Lattimer, or Halliday.

Quoting: Juiceman
Canucks arent paying assets for a rental d man. They werent even interested in Klingberg to begin with. We are selling, not buying


Which you notice I mention when I broke down the Cannucks trade in my post. I'm contesting the "We could have got him for free" statement which we all know isn't true, you never COULD have gotten him for free if you had wanted him. That said, you are right, the Cannucks are not a match for the trade, for the reasons I had already listed.
29 août 2022 à 14 h 49
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 3,313
Mentions "j'aime": 1,840
I can’t see Nashville having any interest in Klingberg (Atleast not at anything near that price). We have enough pmd which is why we grabbed mcdonagh.
gmgb et GeauxPreds1 a aimé ceci.
29 août 2022 à 14 h 50
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 7,610
Mentions "j'aime": 5,206
NSH is the team that would have the least interest in Klingberg, so they pay the highest price? Madness.
GeauxPreds1 a aimé ceci.
29 août 2022 à 15 h 48
#17
H.Lindholm Lover
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 3,598
Mentions "j'aime": 921
wait so the leafs give up knies + two picks for comtois? no thanks
29 août 2022 à 19 h 31
#18
BORDEGOD
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 1,310
Mentions "j'aime": 490
Outside of Ottawa everyone says no easily.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage