SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Zito being Zito

Créé par: MeetYourMakar
Équipe: 2022-23 Avalanche du Colorado
Date de création initiale: 26 août 2022
Publié: 26 août 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I know Lundell is of high value to Panthers but he isn't in the Byram level of prospect. What would it cost to get him? Humor me here
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 000 000 $
Transactions
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
2024
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
2025
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2282 500 000 $80 177 500 $25 000 $4 412 500 $2 322 500 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
908 333 $908 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
912 500 $912 500 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
DG/DD
RFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
5 300 000 $5 300 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
987 500 $987 500 $
DG/DD, AG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
26 août 2022 à 14 h 41
#26
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 2,830
Mentions "j'aime": 2,481
Quoting: Hockey91
And your argument is better? Byram was playing against 3rd and 4th like players until playoffs. Kadri had his first good season. Lundell would of definitely had a similar season in that team. A lot of players could have. Lundell is only growing kadri will never do that again.


Mine wasnt based off a hypothetical that Lundell outscored Kadri. Kadri has had 30 goal seasons. You're right he will not repeats last season.
Byram elevated his play against higher competition in a more critical time. Lundell did not. The Panthers were the top team last season, I think his points are where theyd be on any of the top teams middle 6.
26 août 2022 à 14 h 46
#27
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: Xqb15a
Oh you mean leading the Stanley Cup playoffs in 5v5 TOI, or the 60.4 CF 5v5, or leading playoffs in +/-? I know it’s tough to understand the concept of dominating play not using points but it does happen. I mean I know it’s tough not watching playoff hockey but c’mon man.😏


Sure he had a good run but that doesnt mean Lundell isn't on his level value wise. Lundell had a better regular season than Byram. Byram's concussion problems also bring down his value
26 août 2022 à 14 h 59
#28
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 2,830
Mentions "j'aime": 2,481
Quoting: Juiceman
Sure he had a good run but that doesnt mean Lundell isn't on his level value wise. Lundell had a better regular season than Byram. Byram's concussion problems also bring down his value


I've come around to seeing them closer in value than before but I wouldn't trade Byram for Lundell. Byram is currently better when it counts. Also looking down the road, a top pair do it all dman is more valuable than Lundell will be as a 2c.
Juiceman a aimé ceci.
26 août 2022 à 16 h 9
#29
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,339
Mentions "j'aime": 8,990
Quoting: Juiceman
Sure he had a good run but that doesnt mean Lundell isn't on his level value wise. Lundell had a better regular season than Byram. Byram's concussion problems also bring down his value

You tell yourself that. Lundell doesn’t have 1C potential. He is good and it shouldn’t be interpreted that I’m saying he isn’t good. But Byram has #1 d potential, i mean he won’t be that guy in COL because of Makar but Makar is the best dman in the league. Byram is just becoming what he was projected all along. And imo the value of #1 d far exceeds the value of a 2C.
MeetYourMakar a aimé ceci.
26 août 2022 à 16 h 15
#30
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: Xqb15a
You tell yourself that. Lundell doesn’t have 1C potential. He is good and it shouldn’t be interpreted that I’m saying he isn’t good. But Byram has #1 d potential, i mean he won’t be that guy in COL because of Makar but Makar is the best dman in the league. Byram is just becoming what he was projected all along. And imo the value of #1 d far exceeds the value of a 2C.


I dont see why he doesnt have 1C potential. Put up over 40 points in around 60 games as a 20 year old. Not too bad. Maybe not high end 1C but I dont see why he cant be one
26 août 2022 à 16 h 31
#31
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,339
Mentions "j'aime": 8,990
Quoting: Juiceman
I dont see why he doesnt have 1C potential. Put up over 40 points in around 60 games as a 20 year old. Not too bad. Maybe not high end 1C but I dont see why he cant be one

Ok well Byram can be a high end #1 d, exactly what he has been at every level. It’s why COL won’t trade him. He literally allows COL to roll a #1 dman out on the ice all game long the amount of flexibility he allows Bednar to have not just with the dcorp but with the forwards as well. I like Lundell I really do, but there are very very very few players I would trade Byram for.
26 août 2022 à 16 h 48
#32
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 2,082
Mentions "j'aime": 710
Quoting: Xqb15a
You tell yourself that. Lundell doesn’t have 1C potential. He is good and it shouldn’t be interpreted that I’m saying he isn’t good. But Byram has #1 d potential, i mean he won’t be that guy in COL because of Makar but Makar is the best dman in the league. Byram is just becoming what he was projected all along. And imo the value of #1 d far exceeds the value of a 2C.


Lundell definitely has 1c potential. The trade is never gonna happen. Panthers aren’t trading their guy and Colorado isn’t trading their guy. Just doesn’t work for both teams cause no one wants to give up their stud prospect who’s already producing
Xqb15a a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage