I would prob Change the lines too:
1st/Robertson-Pavelski-Seguin
2nd/Benn-Hintz-Gurianov
3rd/Marchmemt-Rodigues-Milano
4th/Glendening-Steel-Kiviranta

Other than that only thing id change is taking the 3rd round pick away from MTL trade. A 2nd rd 2023 picl alone would prob get the trade dome but as far as Faska goes idk much about him either, to me with what ik he would just be a sweetner to the deal

Why’re you breaking up one of the best lines in the league last year to play a much more inferior player than Hintz, in his place?

Also i dont think id sign Sandin only because Toronto would RFA him and would require Dallas to give up their 2023 1st and 3rd round pick (between 4.2mil-6.3mil) if they didnt match the offer so would have to trade back for that unless you traded for his player rights before hand or you offer a contract within that RFA compensation zone that Toronto cant match or double down and offer longer contracts with more money for 2023 1st-2nd-3rd rd picks with contract around 6.3mil-8.4mil

im not a stars fan so i do not know which line exactly youre talking about, unless you mean having milano on the top line in which case its pretty well known that robby can score like its nobodys business and milano had the second highest passes leading to high danger shots/60 last year. in other words robby is the firework and milano is going to be his match. i dont know much about hintz other than that i believe he is a solid complete player sort of a jack of all trades and solid at them all but milano's specific passing expertise is what gets him that spot. i know that hintz will porbably be able to preform on another line but milano will struggle without robertson's goal scoring

the compensation of the contract i offered him is only the Dallas' current second, no first or third involved

Only thing i can pull out my bum is they would be setting Hintz up to “fail” essentially and have a okay year points wise to lower his contract but who tf knows lol

Hintz is a top 20-25 centre in this league, Milano is currently unsigned, it is pretty obvious to me which player is better.

And no Milano won’t help Robertson more than Hintz as he’s better than Milano at basically every aspect of the game except maybe stick-handling. Robertson is a primary LW who plays RW rarely, and Pavelski is a primary RW who plays C rarely (only for faceoff’s because he’s so good at them). The Robo-Hintz-Pavelski line was one of the most successful ones in the league.

If Dallas were to get Milano, his playmaking would be more suited for Gurianov, who has struggled a little bit last year. He’s a good sniper needing a setup man.

So basically making them worse on purpose? Nill would lose his job, it’s clear to him that his only goal should be to make the playoffs (to generate playoff income to our owner, because he only cares about the money).

Given the creator said he doesnt know much about the Stars wouldnt beat him up too much;
But i do agree Dallas is in a situation where they meed to start winning and getting playoff appearances or the majority of the staff will be let go

the milano guri connection could be promising too, i think if that was the move i would run
robby-hintz-pav
milano-seguin-guri
benn-rodriguez-marchement

That’s true, maybe I’m being a bit too harsh. It’s just that I think that the majority of people should know how good that line is considering they were our only highlight of last year (minus Oettinger’s magnificent performance).

And your other statement is also true, Stars probably lost money due to Covid and Gaglardi wants to make it up ASAP.

He’s talking about the Robertson-Hintz-Pavelski line that popped off last season

That could very well work, two scoring lines and one physical line (that still has a scoring touch).

Could be newer fan trying to learn the ropes pf players ok the league or casual fan who doesnt pay too much attention but thats besides the point;
But yeah Dallas has been in a rough spot ever since their playoff run couple years ago. Expectations are high with this team given the talent just hasnt worked out for them in recent years and i don’t believe they can afford another rebuild, have to find some sort of success with their roster to build off of and stay competitive

I'd said the trade is actually fine. 3rd for Allen, 2nd for taking Faksa. Or vice-verse.

After looking at his cap hit per year id have to agree with you there. Doesn’t produce enough given the money tied to him

You got more chance of making the world believe flying pigs are the norm than CHI taking that deal.

Seriously you expect the Hawks, a burn it to the ground team, to pay you to take on 3.6M x 3 years for Suter? You want him gone it's gonna cost a 2nd round pick MINIMUM. Plus Suter has an NMC. He is not waiving for Chicago.