SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

The Top 20 Centres 3 Years From Now

Créé par: SudburyWolves
Équipe: 2022-23 Équipe personnalisée
Date de création initiale: 17 août 2022
Publié: 17 août 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Obviously not a science but just an educated guess
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
20500 000 000 $99 136 334 $0 $11 125 000 $400 863 666 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 2
Bedard, Connor
950 000 $950 000 $
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
950 000 $950 000 $
C
RFA - 4
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
897 500 $897 500 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 8
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
8 460 250 $8 460 250 $
C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 août 2022 à 21 h 38
#26
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,823
Mentions "j'aime": 1,117
Quoting: Erkadurk347
I’m really curious. Is your favorite team possibly Dallas? Idk man just a guess


I would bet some Canadian dollars that the 3 of them will be better than Wright.
17 août 2022 à 21 h 39
#27
Speak of the Devil
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 23,925
Mentions "j'aime": 26,426
Quoting: sabresparaavida
Tage Thompson has a shot at this list.


He’s not better than many of the centers on the list and has less potential than basically all of these guys
17 août 2022 à 21 h 39
#28
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,823
Mentions "j'aime": 1,117
Quoting: Erkadurk347
I’m really curious. Is your favorite team possibly Dallas? Idk man just a guess


I would bet some Canadian dollars that the 3 of them will be better than Wright.
17 août 2022 à 21 h 39
#29
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 4,897
Mentions "j'aime": 1,406
Quoting: Devil
You expect 20 year olds to become top 20 centers right away? That seems odd


That was literally my entire point. The idea that in 3 years all these prospects will be top 20 Cs is crazy.
CD282 a aimé ceci.
17 août 2022 à 21 h 41
#30
Speak of the Devil
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 23,925
Mentions "j'aime": 26,426
Quoting: Juiceman
Well half this list is filled with completely unproven players. Pettersson is proven. He is a top 20 center now and will be in 5 years. It’s very hard to judge half those players cause most of them haven’t even seen NHL icetime yet


This list is predicting the top 20 centers in 3 years. What does them being unproven have to do with anything? This is talking about THREE years down the line
17 août 2022 à 21 h 44
#31
Speak of the Devil
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 23,925
Mentions "j'aime": 26,426
Quoting: Islesforthecup
That was literally my entire point. The idea that in 3 years all these prospects will be top 20 Cs is crazy.


I do agree with you to a certain extent
The guys that were drafted in 2021 or 2022 is unlikely they’ll be top 20
I could see anyone from 2020 down
17 août 2022 à 21 h 48
#32
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 4,897
Mentions "j'aime": 1,406
Quoting: Devil
I do agree with you to a certain extent
The guys that were drafted in 2021 or 2022 is unlikely they’ll be top 20
I could see anyone from 2020 down


Its not such a blanket statement. But in 3 years 2020 draftees will be going into their age 22-23 seasons. Most arent going to be top 20 Cs. That would equate to 2017 draftees at the current time. How many of them would you even consider for top 20?
CD282 a aimé ceci.
17 août 2022 à 21 h 49
#33
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 801
Mentions "j'aime": 251
Quoting: Phleb2
I would bet some Canadian dollars that the 3 of them will be better than Wright.


Homie, stop being delusional. One of them has the potential to do that. Not all three. Their current trajectories show that none of them will be top 20 centers. I think they will be great players, possibly for one of them an incredible player that could potentially be on this list. But you can’t say with a straight face that all the other players/prospects that have done better than those three shouldn’t be in the top 20 just bc ur a stars fan and wanna see ur guys on their. Also it is very telling that you don’t watch other teams/prospects so you are commenting after probably just seeing highlights of those three guys, and ur comparing them to players you’ve never watched. Ur making a claim that ur Dallas prospects are great. Not better than other guys that you’ve never actually watched
17 août 2022 à 21 h 55
#34
Speak of the Devil
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 23,925
Mentions "j'aime": 26,426
Quoting: Islesforthecup
Its not such a blanket statement. But in 3 years 2020 draftees will be going into their age 22-23 seasons. Most arent going to be top 20 Cs. That would equate to 2017 draftees at the current time. How many of them would you even consider for top 20?


Hard to compare different draft classes like that. 2020 draft is a much stronger draft than 2017
17 août 2022 à 22 h 1
#35
Ex Nucks fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 17,615
Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
Quoting: Devil
This list is predicting the top 20 centers in 3 years. What does them being unproven have to do with anything? This is talking about THREE years down the line


Right but this is all pure speculation. No list like this can be accurate anyway. I’d imagine a player currently elite in 3 years would be better than a player currently unproven as that other player has had more development time and experience. Even if we go by potential, guys like Sillinger, Lundell, Zegras are too high. This is like saying that half of the 2017-2018 draft class will cover half of the current top 20 centers in the NHL
17 août 2022 à 22 h 14
#36
Speak of the Devil
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 23,925
Mentions "j'aime": 26,426
Quoting: Juiceman
Right but this is all pure speculation. No list like this can be accurate anyway. I’d imagine a player currently elite in 3 years would be better than a player currently unproven as that other player has had more development time and experience. Even if we go by potential, guys like Sillinger, Lundell, Zegras are too high. This is like saying that half of the 2017-2018 draft class will cover half of the current top 20 centers in the NHL


I agree, its pure speculation. So your statement of these players being unproven isn't very relavent
17 août 2022 à 22 h 17
#37
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,823
Mentions "j'aime": 1,117
Quoting: Erkadurk347
Homie, stop being delusional. One of them has the potential to do that. Not all three. Their current trajectories show that none of them will be top 20 centers. I think they will be great players, possibly for one of them an incredible player that could potentially be on this list. But you can’t say with a straight face that all the other players/prospects that have done better than those three shouldn’t be in the top 20 just bc ur a stars fan and wanna see ur guys on their. Also it is very telling that you don’t watch other teams/prospects so you are commenting after probably just seeing highlights of those three guys, and ur comparing them to players you’ve never watched. Ur making a claim that ur Dallas prospects are great. Not better than other guys that you’ve never actually watched


Please, go read my comment again before you have a heart attack
18 août 2022 à 0 h 17
#38
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 801
Mentions "j'aime": 251
Quoting: Phleb2
Please, go read my comment again before you have a heart attack


My point is stop comparing players that haven’t done nearly as much as other players on this list. The trajectories don’t line up to be a top 20 center. I did read ur comment and the first one was a very bold and most likely untrue one. Ur Shane Wright one to me is absurd, but I could definitely see it happening if all goes well. Ya can’t comment they’ll be better than Wright after I called you a Dallas fan. Ur saying go read my comment when ur answer has got nothing to do with my comment. Ur a hypocrite my friend. And ya clearly don’t watch hockey
18 août 2022 à 7 h 14
#39
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 1,823
Mentions "j'aime": 1,117
Quoting: Erkadurk347
My point is stop comparing players that haven’t done nearly as much as other players on this list. The trajectories don’t line up to be a top 20 center. I did read ur comment and the first one was a very bold and most likely untrue one. Ur Shane Wright one to me is absurd, but I could definitely see it happening if all goes well. Ya can’t comment they’ll be better than Wright after I called you a Dallas fan. Ur saying go read my comment when ur answer has got nothing to do with my comment. Ur a hypocrite my friend. And ya clearly don’t watch hockey


Hockey? Oups sorry, I thought we were talking about cricket. I will move along now.
18 août 2022 à 7 h 29
#40
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 23,771
Mentions "j'aime": 7,649
Draisaitl should be higher. There's no reason to think that Barkov will somehow leapfrog him in the next 3 years - they're the same age. Bedard might, but he'll have just turned 20 so even that's a stretch.
18 août 2022 à 7 h 43
#41
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,047
Mentions "j'aime": 847
Quoting: Devil
He’s not better than many of the centers on the list and has less potential than basically all of these guys


He’s got a shot, didn’t say he was going to be. Last season was his breakout season, he started with 12 goals and 20 points in his first 32 games, then followed that up with 26 goals and 48 points in 46 games. If he can repeat that stretch over a full season, that gets him to ~44 goals and ~86 points. Those are the stats of a top 20 center. He was 19th in the league in goals last year (whole league, not just centers), in his first season at center in the NHL. He’s got a shot.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage