Both very similar contracts, only $125,000 AAV difference between the two, Who would you rather have?

Its Hughes and its not even close. Suzuki is good but hes more of a 2C imo. Jack Hughes is already a 1C and is 2 years younger.

oh I agree, I just like doing polls lmao

heschier vs suzuki would be a good one. hughes vs suzuki is just a landslide.

just compared because their contracts are so similar.

yea hughes contract is amazing. that contract is gonna help the devils win a cup. mackinnon 2.0

Agree. Hughes is gonna be a stud.

They’re both good players but ultimately Jack Hughes has the higher ceiling by a decent margin

I think Hischier vs Suzuki is a compelling argument.

It looks very good so far, but I dunno that Hughes is gonna deliver the same level of surplus value on his new deal that Mackinnon has on the deal that he got six years ago

D+3 season ppg

MacKinnon 0.72
Hughes 1.14

"Well I think you're opinion reaps of ignorance, and I don't understand why you bother to be carelessly dismissive"

Yeah, MacKinnon took a bit of a step back, but still, I'm not sure I see Hughes reaching the same ceiling offensively as MacKinnon when he reaches his prime. Hughes just doesn't have MacKinnon's size, and that arguably affects play driving ability somewhat

Lol, what does that have to do with this?

You care if people talk smack about Pettersson or anything about the Canucks but continually talk bad about Hughes

I wasn't talking smack about Hughes lol, I was just voicing my reservations about comparing him to a player like MacKinnon, and I don't think it's that unreasonable. Pettersson has nothing to do with what I previously said