SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Kraken Become Competi

Créé par: AceCane
Équipe: 2022-23 Kraken de Seattle
Date de création initiale: 15 août 2022
Publié: 15 août 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Yeah yeah I already know what your going to say lmao
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3925 000 $
3925 000 $
3925 000 $
3925 000 $
3925 000 $
3925 000 $
3925 000 $
3925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
33 000 000 $
22 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
CGY
  1. Donato, Ryan
  2. Evans, Ryker
  3. Geekie, Morgan
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (WPG)
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (SEA)
  6. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (SEA)
2.
CBJ
  1. Lind, Kole
  2. Tanev, Brandon (1 000 000 $ retained)
  3. Winterton, Ryan
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (SEA)
3.
SEA
    Added to hanafin trade
    CGY
    1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (SEA)
    2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (SEA)
    Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2023
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de SEA
    Logo de SEA
    Logo de COL
    Logo de SEA
    Logo de SEA
    Logo de WSH
    Logo de SEA
    2024
    Logo de SEA
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de SEA
    Logo de SEA
    Logo de SEA
    Logo de SEA
    Logo de CGY
    2025
    Logo de SEA
    Logo de SEA
    Logo de SEA
    Logo de SEA
    Logo de SEA
    Logo de SEA
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2282 500 000 $75 276 666 $0 $1 850 000 $7 223 334 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    897 500 $897 500 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
    C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    AG
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    950 000 $950 000 $
    C
    RFA - 4
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    5 166 666 $5 166 666 $
    C, AG, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    C, AG
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
    AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
    AG, C
    RFA - 2
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    C, AG
    RFA - 1
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    AG, AD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Flames de Calgary
    1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
    DG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    5 900 000 $5 900 000 $
    G
    NTC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
    DG/DD
    NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
    DD
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    800 000 $800 000 $
    DG
    UFA
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Kraken de Seattle
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    G
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    15 août 2022 à 20 h 55
    #1
    bedard cup
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2022
    Messages: 42
    Mentions "j'aime": 5
    Columbus won’t accept
    B_seka17 a aimé ceci.
    15 août 2022 à 20 h 57
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    Canes fan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2022
    Messages: 350
    Mentions "j'aime": 82
    Quoting: Tourigny
    Columbus won’t accept


    Is that not enough? 2 of there top prospects a 1st rd pick and a middle 6 fwd with retained sal so helps bluejackets with cap space to have jenner and texier eligible to play
    15 août 2022 à 21 h 6
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2020
    Messages: 994
    Mentions "j'aime": 227
    Flames reject, we want Wright or Beniers for Hanifin, if he's for sale which he isn't
    swinny a aimé ceci.
    15 août 2022 à 21 h 8
    #4
    Démarrer sujet
    Canes fan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2022
    Messages: 350
    Mentions "j'aime": 82
    Quoting: Depressed_Flames_Fan
    Flames reject, we want Wright or Beniers for Hanifin, if he's for sale which he isn't


    Lol thats just an unrealistic return, especially when in this simulation your getting seattles top defensive prospect and 2 middle/bottom 6 fwds alomg with 2 2nd rd picks this year and a 3rd next… only thing you could change ino is maybe add a 1st rd and take away a 2nd rd pick
    15 août 2022 à 21 h 21
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2019
    Messages: 3,756
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,217
    The jackets trade doesn’t make sense for them. We need help at the top of our lineup not depth. So giving up the player with the highest upside in the entire organization, for a bunch of mid tier assets doesn’t make sense.

    In A Kent Johnson trade the jackets would be looking for a young center with the top 6 upside. So literally what we are giving up.
    Ajp_18, B_seka17 et Viqsi a aimé ceci.
    15 août 2022 à 21 h 27
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    Canes fan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2022
    Messages: 350
    Mentions "j'aime": 82
    Quoting: The_Cannon
    The jackets trade doesn’t make sense for them. We need help at the top of our lineup not depth. So giving up the player with the highest upside in the entire organization, for a bunch of mid tier assets doesn’t make sense.

    In A Kent Johnson trade the jackets would be looking for a young center with the top 6 upside. So literally what we are giving up.


    Why i added Winterton and Lind to the trade, two top 5 prospects the Kraken have alongside tanev on a 2.5mil x 3yr deal after the 1mil retained to give your 3rd line a physical winger who can produce with 2024 1st rd pick i thibk is more than enough, maybe switch the 1st to a 2023 for more appeal in the trade
    15 août 2022 à 21 h 31
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2019
    Messages: 3,756
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,217
    Quoting: AceCane
    Why i added Winterton and Lind to the trade, two top 5 prospects the Kraken have alongside tanev on a 2.5mil x 3yr deal after the 1mil retained to give your 3rd line a physical winger who can produce with 2024 1st rd pick i thibk is more than enough, maybe switch the 1st to a 2023 for more appeal in the trade


    Still doesn’t fulfill the quality vs quantity. Obviously Kent is not worth either wright or beniers but those are the only two assets we would be interested in a Johnson swap. No asset in that trade comes close to the upside Kent has. And we need that upside compared to 3-4 mid tier assets.
    Bluntly Jackets need high end centers. Kent is projected to be a high end player and potentially a center. What is being offered isn’t what we are looking for. It isn’t close either.
    Ajp_18 et Viqsi a aimé ceci.
    15 août 2022 à 21 h 35
    #8
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2019
    Messages: 3,756
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,217
    Counter,
    Beniers for cuelemans, del bell belluz, a 24 first and nyquist half retained.
    2 top five prospects, a first and roster player for a top end asset center asset.

    It doesn’t really work.

    EDIT:changing cuelemans to foudy to have closer comparison to Johnson trade. If lind is a top 5 prospect at 23, foudy definitely is.
    Ajp_18 et Viqsi a aimé ceci.
    15 août 2022 à 21 h 41
    #9
    Démarrer sujet
    Canes fan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2022
    Messages: 350
    Mentions "j'aime": 82
    Quoting: The_Cannon
    Still doesn’t fulfill the quality vs quantity. Obviously Kent is not worth either wright or beniers but those are the only two assets we would be interested in a Johnson swap. No asset in that trade comes close to the upside Kent has. And we need that upside compared to 3-4 mid tier assets.
    Bluntly Jackets need high end centers. Kent is projected to be a high end player and potentially a center. What is being offered isn’t what we are looking for. It isn’t close either.


    Its debatable since Winterton was a ppg player last season in the OHL 46points-20G-26A in 37 games and Lind would’ve been ppg players last year in the AHL-35 points-17G-18A in 46 games if it wasn’t for his 23 gameNHL stint last season where he had 2G-6A-8p so he can also give you offensive upside along with Tanev this season
    15 août 2022 à 21 h 46
    #10
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2019
    Messages: 3,756
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,217
    Quoting: AceCane
    Its debatable since Winterton was a ppg player last season in the OHL 46points-20G-26A in 37 games and Lind would’ve been ppg players last year in the AHL-35 points-17G-18A in 46 games if it wasn’t for his 23 gameNHL stint last season where he had 2G-6A-8p so he can also give you offensive upside along with Tanev this season


    Ppg in the ncaa > Ppg whl. He’s a good prospect. He’s not KJ.
    Lind is 23, He’s about as good as he gets most likely Tanev is a solid player but we have 18 forwards who need ice time at the nhl. And the first is nice but should be later. If it isn’t then it wouldn’t be available or would have protection or even if it isn’t, and it is top5 we just draft another Kent Johnson 2 years later leaving too young for our JG and werenski core by the time he is nhl ready.

    We’re not gonna see eye to eye.

    Edit, added more to first round pick, at best we get another KJ, and Age gaps our core too much. By the time player X is ready Johnny hockey will be in his 30s and werenski will be 30.
    AceCane, Ajp_18 et Viqsi a aimé ceci.
    15 août 2022 à 21 h 48
    #11
    Démarrer sujet
    Canes fan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2022
    Messages: 350
    Mentions "j'aime": 82
    Quoting: The_Cannon
    Ppg in the ncaa > Ppg whl. He’s a good prospect. He’s not KJ.
    Lind is 23, He’s about as good as he gets most likely Tanev is a solid player but we have 18 forwards who need ice time at the nhl. And the first is nice but should be later. If it isn’t then it wouldn’t be available or would have protection.

    We’re not gonna see eye to eye.


    Probably not but enjoyed the debate, helped me learn little more about KJ and didnt have awful rebuttals trying to belittle the other lmao
    Friendly_Cannon a aimé ceci.
    15 août 2022 à 21 h 50
    #12
    Démarrer sujet
    Canes fan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2022
    Messages: 350
    Mentions "j'aime": 82
    Quoting: The_Cannon
    Ppg in the ncaa > Ppg whl. He’s a good prospect. He’s not KJ.
    Lind is 23, He’s about as good as he gets most likely Tanev is a solid player but we have 18 forwards who need ice time at the nhl. And the first is nice but should be later. If it isn’t then it wouldn’t be available or would have protection or even if it isn’t, and it is top5 we just draft another Kent Johnson 2 years later leaving too young for our JG and werenski core by the time he is nhl ready.

    We’re not gonna see eye to eye.


    If anything im getting from this would need A-better prospect and another 1st maybe or B- young top 6 player, prospect and a first instead of the middle 6 fwd
    15 août 2022 à 21 h 51
    #13
    Démarrer sujet
    Canes fan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2022
    Messages: 350
    Mentions "j'aime": 82
    Quoting: AceCane
    If anything im getting from this would need A-better prospect and another 1st maybe or B- young top 6 player, prospect and a first instead of the middle 6 fwd


    Or C- not for sale lmaooooo
    Quoting: The_Cannon
    Ppg in the ncaa > Ppg whl. He’s a good prospect. He’s not KJ.
    Lind is 23, He’s about as good as he gets most likely Tanev is a solid player but we have 18 forwards who need ice time at the nhl. And the first is nice but should be later. If it isn’t then it wouldn’t be available or would have protection or even if it isn’t, and it is top5 we just draft another Kent Johnson 2 years later leaving too young for our JG and werenski core by the time he is nhl ready.

    We’re not gonna see eye to eye.

    Edit, added more to first round pick, at best we get another KJ, and Age gaps our core too much. By the time player X is ready Johnny hockey will be in his 30s and werenski will be 30.
    15 août 2022 à 21 h 52
    #14
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2019
    Messages: 3,756
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,217
    Quoting: AceCane
    If anything im getting from this would need A-better prospect and another 1st maybe or B- young top 6 player, prospect and a first instead of the middle 6 fwd

    Needs to be a young center coming back. Quality over quantity. The only 2 assets we would be interested in are non touchables.
    AceCane, Ajp_18 et Viqsi a aimé ceci.
    15 août 2022 à 21 h 59
    #15
    Flames
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 1,093
    Mentions "j'aime": 332
    There is literally nothing of interest in your offer for Hanifin
    swinny a aimé ceci.
    15 août 2022 à 23 h 8
    #16
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 4,783
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,005
    Quoting: AceCane
    Lol thats just an unrealistic return, especially when in this simulation your getting seattles top defensive prospect and 2 middle/bottom 6 fwds alomg with 2 2nd rd picks this year and a 3rd next… only thing you could change ino is maybe add a 1st rd and take away a 2nd rd pick


    You are wrong and he is right.

    Hanafin is a top pairing LD who is ONLY 25. Dude..... Hanafin is an upgrade on Dunn. Full stop.

    Further to the point, the Flames are still highly competitive. Landing a prospect is warm amd fuzzy, but a pair of bottom 6 forwards that the Flames literally have no room for and 2nd round picks (which is about a 15% chance of being an NHL player), isn't gonna cut it.

    I am a Leafs fan and can tell you this much, so what does that tell you?
    15 août 2022 à 23 h 12
    #17
    Démarrer sujet
    Canes fan
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juill. 2022
    Messages: 350
    Mentions "j'aime": 82
    Quoting: swinny
    You are wrong and he is right.

    Hanafin is a top pairing LD who is ONLY 25. Dude..... Hanafin is an upgrade on Dunn. Full stop.

    Further to the point, the Flames are still highly competitive. Landing a prospect is warm amd fuzzy, but a pair of bottom 6 forwards that the Flames literally have no room for and 2nd round picks (which is about a 15% chance of being an NHL player), isn't gonna cut it.

    I am a Leafs fan and can tell you this much, so what does that tell you?


    Lol and im a Hurricanes fan who saw him play whats your point lmao and if anything its a start for a deal to be made and the guy who drafted Hanafin is now the gm of Seattle and he would prob go after his former 1st rd pick
    15 août 2022 à 23 h 15
    #18
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 4,783
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,005
    Quoting: AceCane
    Lol and im a Hurricanes fan who saw him play whats your point lmao and if anything its a start for a deal to be made and the guy who drafted Hanafin is now the gm of Seattle and he would prob go after his former 1st rd pick


    Hanafin as a Cane was undeveloped and buried. That's the point.

    He can go after Hanafin sure. But Wright with Soucy going back is much more a starting point. (Berniers I see as a no fly zone) Your package is a bag of pucks and you know it.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage