is peeke only worth that little?

If that's the price for Peeke Vancouver would be all over that

sooo make the bottom 3 defense even worse?

he's pretty much another Savard but uh yeah I think he should be worth like a 2nd 1 for 1 at most

yeah i was about to say
im gonna make like 10 agm's with peeke by tomorrow

Why would the Kings agree to that?

No, we're not trading two years of Viktor Arvidsson for one year of a 33-year-old rental Gustav Nyquist, as nice a player as he is. Among other things, it would cost us Alex Iafallo or Sean Walker.

None of your trades make sense. Bayreuther and Meyer don't have value; those teams already have identical AAAA dudes of their own. The last thing the Islanders need is a defenseman, and there are several teams in need of RD (Vancouver, LA) who'd outbid that in a second. And finally, LA has no interest in a rental. Switch the Peeke trade to LA and delete the fourth and maybe you're on the right track.

I don't think we need to trade Gus just to replace him with another F. Our issue is we have too many Fs as is, considering KJ, Marchenko, Chinakhov, etc. all need playing time. Trading him for a player like Arvidsson is just adding on more cap for next year; i.e. we can make cap for Gavvy's extension by not taking on more cap for next year.

If we're trading D, I'd rather move Bean than Peeke. Peeke is on a good track to become a B4 defensive-D that we need - I think he and Gavvy could become a killer middle pair in another year or so. Bean is another offensive puck-mover, which we don't need right now.

Silly and Chinny should not be 4th-liners. Swap Kuraly with KJ, and move that line down. Plus, need room for Boone and Tex (see what we mean about too many Fs?)..

Philly declines

Why are we practically giving Peeke away for free? That's not very good asset management.

I like Arvy from his Preds days, but we've got too many forwards as is. (And how in the world is Nyquist "not a fit" but Arvy is?)

You lost me at 8Y