SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Ranking each teams center depth

Créé par: NHLfan10506
Équipe: 2022-23 Équipe personnalisée
Date de création initiale: 14 août 2022
Publié: 14 août 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
1. EDM: McDavid, Draisaitl, McLeod
2. FLA: Barkov, Bennett, Lundell
3. TBL: Point, Stamkos, Cirelli
4. TOR: Matthews, Tavarevs, Kampf
5. PIT: Crosby, Malkin, Blueger
6. NJD: Hughes, Hischier, Mercer
7. STL: Thomas, O'Reilly, Schenn
8. COL: MacKinnon, Newhook, Compher
9. BOS: Bergeron, Krejci, Coyle
10. LAK: Kopitar, Danault, Byfield
11. OTT: Norris, Stutzle, Pinto
12. ANA: Zegras, Strome, McTavish
13. NYI: Barzal, Nelson, Pageu
14. VAN: Pettersson, Hovat, Dickinson
15. MIN: Hartman, Eriksson-Ek, Gaudreau
16. VGK: Eichel, Karlsson, Patrick
17. NYR: Zibanejad, Trocheck, Chytil
18. WPG: Scheifele, Dubois, Lowry
19. CAR: Aho, Kotkamiemi, Drury
20. SEA: Gourde, Beniers, Wright
21. SJS: Hertl, Couture, Bonino
22. CGY: Lindholm, Backlund, Monahan
23. NSH: Granlund, Johansen, Sissions
24. DET: Larkin, Copp, Suter
25. PHI: Couturier, Hayes, Frost
26. WAS: Kuznetsov, Strome, Eller
27. DAL: Benn, Hintz, Faksa
28. MTL: Suzuki, Dvorak, Evans
29. BUF: Thompson, Mittelstadt, Girgensons
30. CHI: Toews, Domi, Khaira
31. CBJ: Jenner, Roslovic, Sillinger
32. ARI: Smith, McBain, Boyd
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
9682 500 000 $434 499 905 $0 $20 025 000 $-351 999 905 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
McLeod, Ryan
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
4 425 000 $4 425 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 8
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Lightning de Tampa Bay
4 800 000 $4 800 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
7 250 000 $7 250 000 $
C
UFA - 5
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
2 800 000 $2 800 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
1 875 000 $1 875 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blues de St-Louis
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
C, AG
NTC
UFA - 6
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
908 333 $908 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 000 000 $$2M)
C
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 650 000 $$3M)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
7 950 000 $7 950 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 5
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Islanders de New York
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Islanders de New York
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Islanders de New York
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Wild du Minnesota
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
5 900 000 $5 900 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
8 460 250 $8 460 250 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
4 820 000 $4 820 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
925 000 $925 000 $
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
5 166 666 $5 166 666 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
897 500 $897 500 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
950 000 $950 000 $
C
RFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 025 000 $1 025 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Predators de Nashville
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Predators de Nashville
2 857 143 $2 857 143 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
C
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
7 750 000 $7 750 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
3 571 429 $3 571 429 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
800 000 $800 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 415 000 $2 415 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Stars de Dallas
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Stars de Dallas
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
975 000 $975 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
883 750 $883 750 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
883 750 $883 750 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 août 2022 à 21 h 29
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,696
Mentions "j'aime": 14,462
Dylan cozens is buffalo's 2C...
NHLfan10506 a aimé ceci.
14 août 2022 à 21 h 30
#2
Lets Get Kraken
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 8,629
Mentions "j'aime": 3,469
I feel like Carolina’s ranking will be a lot higher as the season goes by.
vikhodush a aimé ceci.
14 août 2022 à 21 h 30
#3
Bandwagon fairweathe
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,595
Mentions "j'aime": 3,253
Patrick not available in Vegas, jets should be higher
NHLfan10506 a aimé ceci.
14 août 2022 à 21 h 30
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 16,992
Mentions "j'aime": 11,991
Feels so good seeing Ottawa not in the bottom of these lists. It's all thanks to the San Jose Sharks
NHLfan10506 a aimé ceci.
14 août 2022 à 21 h 31
#5
PDG over PDO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 5,032
Mentions "j'aime": 4,094
Miller plays center for Van Dickinson played wing most of the year, Our top 3 Centers should Be Pettersson Miller Horvat
Warpbox a aimé ceci.
14 août 2022 à 21 h 39
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,537
Mentions "j'aime": 5,032
Aho, Kotkamiemi, Drury.. Does Jordan Staal no longer exist? Did I imagine that?
14 août 2022 à 21 h 52
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,065
Mentions "j'aime": 18,333
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
Dylan cozens is buffalo's 2C...


Quoting: theleano1
Miller plays center for Van Dickinson played wing most of the year, Our top 3 Centers should Be Pettersson Miller Horvat


Quoting: Caniac2000
Aho, Kotkamiemi, Drury.. Does Jordan Staal no longer exist? Did I imagine that?


Hard to keep track of all 32 lineups. You all would know better than me…

Thought they wanted Cozens at LW1, no?
So Miller at C, Pettersson at LW?
Staal as 4C….was really just giving props to Drury here.
14 août 2022 à 21 h 53
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,065
Mentions "j'aime": 18,333
Quoting: evelutions2
I feel like Carolina’s ranking will be a lot higher as the season goes by.


Once Scheifele arrives, yes
CD282 a aimé ceci.
14 août 2022 à 22 h 0
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 4,292
Mentions "j'aime": 2,340
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Hard to keep track of all 32 lineups. You all would know better than me…

Thought they wanted Cozens at LW1, no?
So Miller at C, Pettersson at LW?
Staal as 4C….was really just giving props to Drury here.


Cozens has never played LW in the NHL, I’m not really sure why they have him listed as one. Skinner is LW 1 on the Sabres.
14 août 2022 à 22 h 29
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,537
Mentions "j'aime": 5,032
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Hard to keep track of all 32 lineups. You all would know better than me…

Thought they wanted Cozens at LW1, no?
So Miller at C, Pettersson at LW?
Staal as 4C….was really just giving props to Drury here.


If Jordan Staal plays a single game at 4C this season, I will personally give you the AAV of Jack Hughes contract. If he plays 4C minutes, it will mean Kotkaniemi and Necas (not Drury) have found success down the middle and Carolina's C core will be the best in the NHL. Staal's defensive play rivals Bergerons. He doesn't have the offensive base numbers, but his play driving is incredible. He's still a very good 3C. Overpaid for inability to produce, but that 10 year deal ends this year.
14 août 2022 à 22 h 52
#11
PDG over PDO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 5,032
Mentions "j'aime": 4,094
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Hard to keep track of all 32 lineups. You all would know better than me…

Thought they wanted Cozens at LW1, no?
So Miller at C, Pettersson at LW?
Staal as 4C….was really just giving props to Drury here.


Miller and Pettey didn't play together 5 on 5 much, Pettey was our #1C Miller #2C and Horvat was #3C
14 août 2022 à 22 h 55
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,065
Mentions "j'aime": 18,333
Quoting: theleano1
Miller and Pettey didn't play together 5 on 5 much, Pettey was our #1C Miller #2C and Horvat was #3C


Didn’t Pettersson play some 3LW this year? I think he was there when NJD went to VAN
14 août 2022 à 23 h 9
#13
PDG over PDO
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 5,032
Mentions "j'aime": 4,094
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Didn’t Pettersson play some 3LW this year? I think he was there when NJD went to VAN


He played about 100 mins at wing this year on, compared to his 402 minutes at center, even when they stacked the top line with Miller - Pettersson - Boeser it usually was Pettersson playing center, Miller also played close to 300 minutes at center as well
NHLfan10506 a aimé ceci.
14 août 2022 à 23 h 20
#14
Kster
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 1,278
Mentions "j'aime": 359
Florida over rated. Barkov legit but Bennet - meh. Lundell looks good but still young. Not even top 5, barely top 10 imo
14 août 2022 à 23 h 29
#15
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,065
Mentions "j'aime": 18,333
Quoting: kster34
Florida over rated. Barkov legit but Bennet - meh. Lundell looks good but still young. Not even top 5, barely top 10 imo


Lundell is legit
CD282 a aimé ceci.
14 août 2022 à 23 h 35
#16
Jinx god
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 10,202
Mentions "j'aime": 13,730
Hintz is our number one centre, he’s a top 20-25 centre in the league. After that you’ve got Seguin, Benn/Peterson/Dellandrea, and lastly Faksa.
14 août 2022 à 23 h 37
#17
Kster
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 1,278
Mentions "j'aime": 359
Quoting: NHLfan10506
Lundell is legit


Maybe, but he’s still young. His gpg (0.27) and ppg (0.67) were ok but not great. His FO % was abysmal. Again young player that looks good but has a lot to show before he can be placed in 2nd best centre corps in league. Bennett is nothing special so no way Florida has the 2nd best centres; maybe in a few years (if Lindell fulfills your promise) but not today
14 août 2022 à 23 h 39
#18
Speak of the Devil
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 23,935
Mentions "j'aime": 26,436
Gaudreau chose to sign with the 31st ranked center core opposed to the 6th ranked
Still Can't believe it
CD282 a aimé ceci.
15 août 2022 à 7 h 43
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,576
Mentions "j'aime": 5,453
Florida way too high. Bennett has had one good season (not even great) while playing with Huberdeau in a top offensive system. Also, Sens, Ducks, Wild, Kraken are too high imo. Islanders and Rangers could move up. Can't put Mercer with NJD if you don't put Miller and Staal on their teams.
15 août 2022 à 8 h 1
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,004
Mentions "j'aime": 7,734
Quoting: theleano1
He played about 100 mins at wing this year on, compared to his 402 minutes at center, even when they stacked the top line with Miller - Pettersson - Boeser it usually was Pettersson playing center, Miller also played close to 300 minutes at center as well


Pettersson played 1089:04 at 5v5 in 21-22, so you're leaving a LOT of minutes unaccounted for.
15 août 2022 à 8 h 6
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,004
Mentions "j'aime": 7,734
Quoting: kster34
Maybe, but he’s still young. His gpg (0.27) and ppg (0.67) were ok but not great. His FO % was abysmal. Again young player that looks good but has a lot to show before he can be placed in 2nd best centre corps in league. Bennett is nothing special so no way Florida has the 2nd best centres; maybe in a few years (if Lindell fulfills your promise) but not today

You realize that P/GP of 0.67 is solidly a 2nd line rate, right? So they've got an elite 1st line C and two good 2nd line C's - that gives them a nearly unbeatable trio.
15 août 2022 à 8 h 19
#22
Kster
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 1,278
Mentions "j'aime": 359
Quoting: CD282
You realize that P/GP of 0.67 is solidly a 2nd line rate, right? So they've got an elite 1st line C and two good 2nd line C's - that gives them a nearly unbeatable trio.

Unbeatable trio tears of joy ?
Not saying they are bad, but no way they are second overall. Barkov is elite but Bennett and lundell are just average (although lundell has high ceiling so he May get better) - their f/o%s are also terrible.
Leafs, Bolts, Pens, Blues are all better (as a start).
15 août 2022 à 8 h 41
#23
Bedard23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 9,294
Mentions "j'aime": 4,475
Washington centers>Nashville centers
15 août 2022 à 8 h 42
#24
do not Devil my ass
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,880
Mentions "j'aime": 4,254
Modifié 15 août 2022 à 9 h 53
Quoting: kster34
their f/o%s are also terrible.
Leafs, Bolts, Pens, Blues are all better (as a start).


Faceoff percentages are among the least important stats in the game of hockey.
Winning a faceoff has on average close to zero predictability power as to whether the team scores or get scored on in that same sequence.
Faceoffs literally do not matter.
CD282 a aimé ceci.
15 août 2022 à 8 h 48
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,004
Mentions "j'aime": 7,734
Quoting: Tintin
Faceoff percentages are among the least important stats in the game of hockey.
Winning or faceoff has on average close to zero predictability power as to whether the teams scores or get scored on in that same sequence.
Faceoffs literally do not matter.

By and large this is correct. There are critical faceoffs that DO matter, but those are highly situational and account for only a small percentage of the total.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage