SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Ernie

Créé par: Ernie
Équipe: 2022-23 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 14 août 2022
Publié: 14 août 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I like the looks of this line up
and alot of depth
gonna lose some players to waivers tho
i just dont think muzzin would wave his no trade unless the agreement with chicago is to flip him to a contender at the trade deadline
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
32 200 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 250 000 $
21 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (COL)
2.
TOR
  1. Hathaway, Garnet
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (WSH)
  3. Choix de 7e ronde en 2023 (WSH)
WSH
  1. Kerfoot, Alexander
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
  3. Choix de 7e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
3.
CHI
  1. Der-Arguchintsev, Semyon
  2. Muzzin, Jake
  3. Niemelä, Topi
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
  5. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (TOR)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de WSH
Logo de OTT
Logo de COL
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de WSH
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $82 352 283 $212 500 $0 $147 717 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
796 667 $796 667 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
762 500 $762 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
827 500 $827 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
14 août 2022 à 19 h 44
#1
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,662
Mentions "j'aime": 24,577
I think that you're optimistic on Jake Muzzin's trade value. Connor Murphy is a top-4 defenseman (after all, that's where you're going to play him) on a four-year contract term at a very reasonable cap hit, so his value alone is a current-year second-round draft pick and an A prospect, at least. And Chicago isn't going to take on Muzzin's massive cap hit without a convincing incentive on top of that.
vikhodush a aimé ceci.
14 août 2022 à 19 h 54
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 6,694
Mentions "j'aime": 3,362
Wow Muzzin waived to go to a tanking team when he had all leverage, that’s good luck for the leafs.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
14 août 2022 à 20 h 1
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 171
Mentions "j'aime": 8
Quoting: OldNYIfan
I think that you're optimistic on Jake Muzzin's trade value. Connor Murphy is a top-4 defenseman (after all, that's where you're going to play him) on a four-year contract term at a very reasonable cap hit, so his value alone is a current-year second-round draft pick and an A prospect, at least. And Chicago isn't going to take on Muzzin's massive cap hit without a convincing incentive on top of that.


Ya i agree
so i boosted up the return for Murphy
and i think hawks would flip muzzin at deadline for something good if they retain some salary
it may work this way
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
14 août 2022 à 20 h 3
#4
Smythe.over.Hart
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 3,032
Mentions "j'aime": 2,348
Out with Ernie! Bring back Josh!!!
14 août 2022 à 20 h 11
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,379
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: OldNYIfan
I think that you're optimistic on Jake Muzzin's trade value. Connor Murphy is a top-4 defenseman (after all, that's where you're going to play him) on a four-year contract term at a very reasonable cap hit, so his value alone is a current-year second-round draft pick and an A prospect, at least. And Chicago isn't going to take on Muzzin's massive cap hit without a convincing incentive on top of that.


Disagree. I think this is an overpay. Muzzin is not as terrible as people make him out to be and is paid like 6 million over the next two years. Yes he has a bigger cap hit, but not crazy

Muzzin has also been a significantly better defenseman than Murphy until last year. Yes he had a bad year and is older but the negative value people think he has is crazy.

By your description SDA plus a third is likely a second. Niemela is a top prospect. So that's Murphy. I would not trade a first to move muzzin.
GMBL a aimé ceci.
14 août 2022 à 20 h 27
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 8,566
Mentions "j'aime": 3,319
Quoting: OldNYIfan
I think that you're optimistic on Jake Muzzin's trade value. Connor Murphy is a top-4 defenseman (after all, that's where you're going to play him) on a four-year contract term at a very reasonable cap hit, so his value alone is a current-year second-round draft pick and an A prospect, at least. And Chicago isn't going to take on Muzzin's massive cap hit without a convincing incentive on top of that.


Muzzin was 31 had a 4mx2 hit when he was acquired for a 1st+Grunderstrom+Durzi, I don't think either were considered an A-prospect. Murphy is 2-years younger and has double the term, Muzzin does have value and the cap hits aren't too far, and in terms of salary Muzzin is owed less (even tho money isn't an issue for CHI unless the owner wanted it to be), he also still has value. So, a 1st, 2nd, and 3rd is more than fair for Murphy with Muzzin and no favors, a 1st+ two 2nds for the cap difference is probably all it would take at most, not an A-prospect (definitely not one who is 21 or under or one who would be a premium asset-even though Murphy is a RHD).

Cap space is at a premium though so I could see someone like Robertson+Muzzin+a 1st for Murphy happen but only because Robertson has had snags with his development because of injury (and he's undersized which could drop his value since he's still a borderline NHLer).
14 août 2022 à 21 h 50
#7
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 39,662
Mentions "j'aime": 24,577
Quoting: BCAPP
Disagree. I think this is an overpay. Muzzin is not as terrible as people make him out to be and is paid like 6 million over the next two years. Yes he has a bigger cap hit, but not crazy

Muzzin has also been a significantly better defenseman than Murphy until last year. Yes he had a bad year and is older but the negative value people think he has is crazy.

By your description SDA plus a third is likely a second. Niemela is a top prospect. So that's Murphy. I would not trade a first to move muzzin.


Quoting: GMBL
Muzzin was 31 had a 4mx2 hit when he was acquired for a 1st+Grunderstrom+Durzi, I don't think either were considered an A-prospect. Murphy is 2-years younger and has double the term, Muzzin does have value and the cap hits aren't too far, and in terms of salary Muzzin is owed less (even tho money isn't an issue for CHI unless the owner wanted it to be), he also still has value. So, a 1st, 2nd, and 3rd is more than fair for Murphy with Muzzin and no favors, a 1st+ two 2nds for the cap difference is probably all it would take at most, not an A-prospect (definitely not one who is 21 or under or one who would be a premium asset-even though Murphy is a RHD).

Cap space is at a premium though so I could see someone like Robertson+Muzzin+a 1st for Murphy happen but only because Robertson has had snags with his development because of injury (and he's undersized which could drop his value since he's still a borderline NHLer).


You're both looking at the trade as amended (see the OP's Comment #3). But that's not the trade on which I was commenting. Originally (i.e., when I replied), the offer was Muzzin and a 2024 second for Murphy.
GMBL a aimé ceci.
14 août 2022 à 22 h 3
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 8,566
Mentions "j'aime": 3,319
Modifié 14 août 2022 à 22 h 9
Quoting: OldNYIfan
You're both looking at the trade as amended (see the OP's Comment #3). But that's not the trade on which I was commenting. Originally (i.e., when I replied), the offer was Muzzin and a 2024 second for Murphy.


I figured the trade was ammended, but I was saying an A-level prospect may be included but it wouldn't be necessary (perhaps a 1st+ two 2nds suffices) and you said it would take at least a 1st+2nd+A-level prospect for Murphy straight up. That would likely be the ask but doesn't mean they could get more or that he is worth that.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
14 août 2022 à 22 h 27
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 9,379
Mentions "j'aime": 3,695
Quoting: OldNYIfan
You're both looking at the trade as amended (see the OP's Comment #3). But that's not the trade on which I was commenting. Originally (i.e., when I replied), the offer was Muzzin and a 2024 second for Murphy.


Ahh
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage