SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/NHL Signings

Carolina Hurricanes signed Martin Necas (2 Years / $3,000,000 AAV)

Was this a good signing?
Le graphique a été masqué

Options de sondage


9 août 2022 à 17 h 31
#26
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 945
Mentions "j'aime": 475
Great deal! Guy still has potential, glad we haven’t given up on him yet.
9 août 2022 à 17 h 45
#27
Canes fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 4,475
Mentions "j'aime": 4,578
Glad to have Necas back, still see plenty of potential in him despite last season. The cap hit is great and Necas has plenty of tools to become a great player.
9 août 2022 à 17 h 49
#28
Hakuna Matata
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 33,718
Mentions "j'aime": 20,879
Well looks like Gardiner's days in Carolina are numbered

Either we see a dump trade or a buyout
9 août 2022 à 18 h 12
#29
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 1,442
Mentions "j'aime": 728
Good signing.
9 août 2022 à 18 h 29
#30
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,602
Mentions "j'aime": 9,688
Great deal.
9 août 2022 à 18 h 37
#31
Hawks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,630
Mentions "j'aime": 1,651
Quoting: Scooter81
Can’t wait for someone to vote no on this signing


yk76x096xgx61.jpg?auto=webp&s=46e91485c643ab16697ac37eb5dec6658b6a53b5
Brian2016 et drambui a aimé ceci.
9 août 2022 à 18 h 56
#32
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 9,148
Mentions "j'aime": 2,223
Quoting: Scooter81
Can’t wait for someone to vote no on this signing


I voted NO, he should have gotten more, he is twice as good as Kokteniemi.

The NO vote doesn't always have to judge the team, vote NO because the player got a bad deal.
9 août 2022 à 18 h 59
#33
NoQuitInNewYork
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 2,124
Mentions "j'aime": 743
Quoting: draft_em_sign_em_trade_em
I voted NO, he should have gotten more, he is twice as good as Kokteniemi.


If he’s twice as good as Kokteniemi and he got less it’s a good signing IMO
9 août 2022 à 19 h 11
#34
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 9,148
Mentions "j'aime": 2,223
Quoting: Scooter81
If he’s twice as good as Kokteniemi and he got less it’s a good signing IMO


Good for the Canes, bad for the player.

Vote yes for the team,
Vote no for the player.

There isn't even any grey area in this contract, it's a so clear cut W for the team.

Kotkeniemi got $6 and Necas half that amount.
9 août 2022 à 19 h 26
#35
Canes hockey.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2020
Messages: 270
Mentions "j'aime": 344
Quoting: Trickster
I'm confused

Is the buyout window gone or still there??


(nvm)
9 août 2022 à 19 h 45
#36
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 59,429
Mentions "j'aime": 22,636
Quoting: draft_em_sign_em_trade_em
Good for the Canes, bad for the player.

Vote yes for the team,
Vote no for the player.

There isn't even any grey area in this contract, it's a so clear cut W for the team.

Kotkeniemi got $6 and Necas half that amount.


Well, maybe the Necas deal is fair to both parties. It's just that the KK deal was a complete win for KK. It what happens when team overpays in obtaining an RFA or even an upcoming UFA. The GM seems compelled to resign the player in order to justify the original trade.
9 août 2022 à 20 h 17
#37
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 5,012
Mentions "j'aime": 3,523
Imagine what this deal would've looked like had he signed a year earlier. He had a breakout season in 20-21. He's is still a promising young player with a relatively high ceiling, but he needs to step it up next season.
jr400 a aimé ceci.
9 août 2022 à 20 h 28
#38
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 12,718
Mentions "j'aime": 17,336
Amazing deal, he’s still an RFA and easily worth more than 3mil
9 août 2022 à 21 h 49
#39
Nah.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,428
Mentions "j'aime": 4,295
Quoting: InRodWeTrust
Have faith, brother. The great 'Waddy' might not be done yet.


Sounds like his big move was adding Pacioretty to the LTIR?
9 août 2022 à 21 h 54
#40
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 1,553
Mentions "j'aime": 565
Quoting: dopplsan
Sounds like his big move was adding Pacioretty to the LTIR?


Not sure that was his move, but let's see what he does now...
9 août 2022 à 21 h 56
#41
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,525
Mentions "j'aime": 668
Quoting: Civil_Eng_PE
Gardiner either gets bought out / buried, or Bear gets trades for peanuts


Quoting: dopplsan
Good signing.

Where does this leave CAR's cap situation?


Quoting: Canesfan21_
They will either bury Gardiner and work with 8k in cap space (they won’t)

Or they will trade Bear. I am not entirely sure if they can buyout Gardiner or not.

Actually they can’t even bury him because they have to bring up Drury


Pacioretty going ro LTIR
9 août 2022 à 22 h 19
#42
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 1,046
Mentions "j'aime": 546
Quoting: draft_em_sign_em_trade_em
Kotkeniemi got $6 and Necas half that amount.


Kotkaniemi got $4.8M AAV on his long-term deal, but your point is still valid. Necas put up better numbers in his worst season than Kotkaniemi in his best. Kotkaniemi is a year and a half younger but has one more year in the league. If Necas had arbitration rights, which he didn’t, he could build a strong case using Kotkaniemi as a comparable. But the Hurricanes’ scouting staff sees something in Kotkaniemi – something that I haven’t seen – that has convinced them he’s going to develop into a solid top-6 forward. I guess they’re still yet to be convinced on Necas.

Another reason they may not have wanted to sign him long term is that it probably would have taken a significantly higher AAV, because Necas believes that he’s still a top-6 forward so he’s not going to give up the opportunity to be paid like one, but the team’s priority was keeping this year’s cap hit to a minimum so they wouldn’t have to dump a player they think they need. They could only do that by going short.

What I’m wondering now is where he’s going to slot in the lineup. I think he needs to be in the top six to be effective, but unless Jarvis regresses or somebody gets hurt, it looks like the only potential opening there could be at center (Cap Friendly lists him as a RW-C, but I don’t think he’s ever played C in Carolina), unless they decide to put a guy who can score goals at LW with Staal and Fast on the third line, since that worked out well with Niederreiter in that spot last year.
9 août 2022 à 22 h 30
#43
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 1,046
Mentions "j'aime": 546
Quoting: Trickster
I'm confused

Is the buyout window gone or still there??


The 48-hour buyout window that was created by the Lajoie signing is gone, but I think they can still buy out Gardiner if they waive him.

Quoting: Trickster
some confusion around their ability to do so bc he was on LTIR last year and may have not passed his physical yet.


If he doesn't pass the physical then he can stay on LTIR so there would be no reason to buy him out. If he passes then I believe they have to take him off LTIR, but then they could buy him out. I think they can waive him and buy him out anytime, so I see no need for them to rush into it. I'm not sure exactly when they have to get under the cap, but if they can wait until training camp, that's what I would do.
9 août 2022 à 22 h 45
#44
Nah.
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 4,428
Mentions "j'aime": 4,295
Quoting: CEO
Pacioretty going ro LTIR


Yeah, his plan was tearing ACLs, got it 👍
Civil_Eng_PE a aimé ceci.
9 août 2022 à 22 h 47
#45
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 1,046
Mentions "j'aime": 546
Quoting: jr400
The 48-hour buyout window that was created by the Lajoie signing is gone, but I think they can still buy out Gardiner if they waive him.



If he doesn't pass the physical then he can stay on LTIR so there would be no reason to buy him out. If he passes then I believe they have to take him off LTIR, but then they could buy him out. I think they can waive him and buy him out anytime, so I see no need for them to rush into it. I'm not sure exactly when they have to get under the cap, but if they can wait until training camp, that's what I would do.


Sorry, I think I was wrong about a couple of things:

The 48-hour window created by the Lajoie signing isn't gone, because it doesn't open immediately after the arbitration case is settled. It opens 3 days later and then runs for 48 hours.

I'm less sure about this one, but I think what I misunderstood the note about being able to buy somebody out if they clear waivers. I read it as meaning that's the only way you can buy somebody out if you're outside the buyout window, but I think it's actually just an additional requirement for buying somebody out if you're already in a buyout window. It's not something you can do anytime.

What this means for Gardiner is they can still buy him out, but I think they'll have to move quickly to get him off LTIR and through waivers in the next 48 hours.
9 août 2022 à 22 h 55
#46
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 9,148
Mentions "j'aime": 2,223
Quoting: jr400
Kotkaniemi got $4.8M AAV on his long-term deal, but your point is still valid. Necas put up better numbers in his worst season than Kotkaniemi in his best. Kotkaniemi is a year and a half younger but has one more year in the league. If Necas had arbitration rights, which he didn’t, he could build a strong case using Kotkaniemi as a comparable. But the Hurricanes’ scouting staff sees something in Kotkaniemi – something that I haven’t seen – that has convinced them he’s going to develop into a solid top-6 forward. I guess they’re still yet to be convinced on Necas.

Another reason they may not have wanted to sign him long term is that it probably would have taken a significantly higher AAV, because Necas believes that he’s still a top-6 forward so he’s not going to give up the opportunity to be paid like one, but the team’s priority was keeping this year’s cap hit to a minimum so they wouldn’t have to dump a player they think they need. They could only do that by going short.

What I’m wondering now is where he’s going to slot in the lineup. I think he needs to be in the top six to be effective, but unless Jarvis regresses or somebody gets hurt, it looks like the only potential opening there could be at center (Cap Friendly lists him as a RW-C, but I don’t think he’s ever played C in Carolina), unless they decide to put a guy who can score goals at LW with Staal and Fast on the third line, since that worked out well with Niederreiter in that spot last year.


Paying Kotkaneimi $5 million for 9 years (when you add the $6.1 season to the $4.8 x 8 years) . That contract is in the realm of Yashin and Dipietro bad.
9 août 2022 à 23 h 16
#47
Amirov Forever
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 6,519
Mentions "j'aime": 6,015
Quoting: Trickster
I'm confused

Is the buyout window gone or still there??


If Necas was slated for arbitration, then they will get another buyout window
palhal a aimé ceci.
10 août 2022 à 1 h 38
#48
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 8,370
Mentions "j'aime": 2,275
This is a discount... Necas is betting on himself here.
10 août 2022 à 3 h 3
#49
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: InRodWeTrust
Not this one.


There were other one's that did, just sayin. Confident that if Waddell and co. pushed harder to get him at under 3M, negotiations would have gone all the way and maybe into training camp
10 août 2022 à 8 h 14
#50
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 1,553
Mentions "j'aime": 565
Quoting: Knuckl3s
There were other one's that did, just sayin. Confident that if Waddell and co. pushed harder to get him at under 3M, negotiations would have gone all the way and maybe into training camp


I think the contract is very fair and comparable myself. No complaints from me. And I don't believe mgmt would have allowed this to drag into training camp. They had other business to take care of. They needed to get this done. And now they have even more business to get done.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Chargement de l'animation
Soumettre les modifications du sondage