SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

GM Doug Mackenzie

Équipe: 2022-23 Jets de Winnipeg
Date de création initiale: 6 août 2022
Publié: 6 août 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1950 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1750 000 $
2850 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
WPG
  1. DeBrusk, Jake
  2. Grzelcyk, Matt
  3. Lysell, Fabian
  4. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (BOS)
BOS
  1. Schmidt, Nate
  2. Wheeler, Blake (2 000 000 $ retained)
3.
4.
5.
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de NYR
Logo de WPG
2024
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de BOS
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
2025
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $81 448 690 $0 $1 192 500 $1 051 310 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
7 142 857 $7 142 857 $
AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
975 000 $975 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 2
850 000 $850 000 $
AD, C
UFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 166 667 $6 166 667 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
1 725 000 $1 725 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance630 000 $$630K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
850 000 $850 000 $
AG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
6 août 2022 à 6 h 17
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 282
Mentions "j'aime": 135
Jets need to add to Dubois to get Suzuki out of Montreal
6 août 2022 à 6 h 42
#2
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 159
Mentions "j'aime": 110
Boston doesn't have the cap space for both Wheeler and Schmidt, And Grzelcyk is out until at least January.

All teams not named Winnipeg easily pass.
Campabee a aimé ceci.
6 août 2022 à 7 h 10
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,789
Mentions "j'aime": 8,837
Modifié 6 août 2022 à 7 h 52
Lol. First Boston is cap strapped, not adding cap. 2nd, Wheeler and Schmidt are of no interest, 3rd you are not getting that kind of package for them, they are closer to being dumps than being valuable assets. Even if you took out Lysell Boston would decline in terms of value. You’d have to pay us to take them.
6 août 2022 à 7 h 29
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,578
Mentions "j'aime": 5,454
Really bad trade for the Bruins.

Quoting: HockeyGuy62
Boston doesn't have the cap space for both Wheeler and Schmidt, And Grzelcyk is out until at least January.

All teams not named Winnipeg easily pass.


Grzelcyk is out until late November/debut of December, not at least January.
6 août 2022 à 7 h 41
#5
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 159
Mentions "j'aime": 110
Quoting: bhavikp27
Really bad trade for the Bruins.



Grzelcyk is out until late November/debut of December, not at least January.


Yeah keep confusing him with Marchand and McAvoy, Who're out until late December ready by early January.
6 août 2022 à 7 h 46
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 12,578
Mentions "j'aime": 5,454
Quoting: HockeyGuy62
Yeah keep confusing him with Marchand and McAvoy, Who're out until late December ready by early January.


I actually made a mistake. Here are the actual projected return dates.

Grzelcyk: late October, beginning of November
McAvoy: late November, beginning of December
Marchand: late November, beginning of December
HockeyGuy62 a aimé ceci.
6 août 2022 à 7 h 57
#7
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 159
Mentions "j'aime": 110
Quoting: bhavikp27
I actually made a mistake. Here are the actual projected return dates.

Grzelcyk: late October, beginning of November
McAvoy: late November, beginning of December
Marchand: late November, beginning of December


Not so bad then, if none of them have any setbacks, Marchand coming back from double hip surgery could be longer.
6 août 2022 à 8 h 38
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 3,084
Mentions "j'aime": 2,268
I think what is missing is Co-GM Bob, as he would help refine Doug's bold ideas. They make a great team.
bobdoug10.jpg
6 août 2022 à 9 h 51
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,834
Mentions "j'aime": 551
Quoting: Jacko
Jets need to add to Dubois to get Suzuki out of Montreal


A week ago, I would have freaked out at this suggestion and I still don't like it. But after the hatchet job in The Athletic on contract values, I've begun to reconsider whether Suzuki is entirely indispensable. I've concluded that he's not. Would Dubois-for-Suzuki be the basis for a good trade? I think so. The rest is details. That said, I think Hughes and St.Louis are keen to see what Suzuki and Caufield can do together in a whole year under the new administration.
6 août 2022 à 9 h 58
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 282
Mentions "j'aime": 135
Quoting: HabsRafiki
A week ago, I would have freaked out at this suggestion and I still don't like it. But after the hatchet job in The Athletic on contract values, I've begun to reconsider whether Suzuki is entirely indispensable. I've concluded that he's not. Would Dubois-for-Suzuki be the basis for a good trade? I think so. The rest is details. That said, I think Hughes and St.Louis are keen to see what Suzuki and Caufield can do together in a whole year under the new administration.



Quote from article: “ Personally, I’m excited to see how wrong this one is.

I’m reporting it how the model spits it out now, and as you’ve read — the best framing for each of these players is one born out of optimism. Nick Suzuki deserves the most optimism given his age and previous trajectory. His comps make that even rosier, pushing his positive value probability from 24 percent to 35 percent (inclusion on this list is based on the former number).“

He doesn’t necessarily believe his metrics on Suzuki imo
HabsRafiki a aimé ceci.
6 août 2022 à 10 h 7
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,834
Mentions "j'aime": 551
Modifié 6 août 2022 à 10 h 12
Quoting: Jacko
Quote from article: “ Personally, I’m excited to see how wrong this one is.

I’m reporting it how the model spits it out now, and as you’ve read — the best framing for each of these players is one born out of optimism. Nick Suzuki deserves the most optimism given his age and previous trajectory. His comps make that even rosier, pushing his positive value probability from 24 percent to 35 percent (inclusion on this list is based on the former number).“

He doesn’t necessarily believe his metrics on Suzuki imo


I read that entirely as a hedge and kind of gutless. If Suzuki has a "meh" year, Dom Luszczyszyn can say "I told you he's not worth $8.75M"; and, if Suzuki lights it up, the writer can say "yeah, but I did say it might be wrong". As I said, it's kind of gutless.
Jacko a aimé ceci.
6 août 2022 à 10 h 19
#12
SlafDaddy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 444
Mentions "j'aime": 186
When will Jets fans get through their heads they are in a position of weakness with Dubois, you ain’t getting none of our good young players in exchange when we can get him for free in 2 years.
6 août 2022 à 10 h 43
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,834
Mentions "j'aime": 551
Quoting: Fire_Ducharme
When will Jets fans get through their heads they are in a position of weakness with Dubois, you ain’t getting none of our good young players in exchange when we can get him for free in 2 years.


I think the degree of leverage the two teams have depends entirely on what degree of urgency the Habs' brass feels. If the Habs want to forego the misery of another bottom-5 finish, getting Dubois now would be a benefit. They would still likely miss the playoffs and draft a potentially very good player in the 10 to 15 range. If the goal is to tank another year and get a high lottery pick in 2023 (Bedard, Fantilli, etc) the math changes because there's a good chance they'd be drafting a centreman in that case. In that case, having Suzuki, Dubois and (dare to dream) Bedard is not tenable. In that case, A Suzuki-for-Dubois trade sooner than later starts to make sense.
6 août 2022 à 12 h 37
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 103
Mentions "j'aime": 65
Quoting: Fire_Ducharme
When will Jets fans get through their heads they are in a position of weakness with Dubois, you ain’t getting none of our good young players in exchange when we can get him for free in 2 years.


The jets aren’t in a position of weakness. if Montreal doesn’t want to pony up and make a real offer for Dubois he’ll get traded to a contender at the deadline this year or in 23-24. The problem with that for Montreal is Dubois has only played in Columbus and now Winnipeg. You don’t think he could be easily convinced to sign long term in Tampa, Florida, NY, LA maybe even Dallas or Nashville? This would be bad news for Montreal because if you didn’t think Dubois was going to be 2c for the foreseeable future you would have drafted Shane Wright if Dubois doesn’t end up there you’re going to have a massive hole at 2c.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage