Forums/NHL Signings

New Jersey Devils signed Jesper Bratt (1 Year / $5,450,000 AAV)

Was this a good signing?
Le graphique a été masqué

Options de sondage


mer. à 10 h 2
#1
Jesper Bratt has signed a new contract with the New Jersey Devils.
CONTRAT STANDARD
Contrats comparablesCOMPARER CE CONTRAT
SIGNÉ PAR: Tom Fitzgerald
DURÉE: 1 AN
STATUT À L’ÉCHÉANCE DU CONTRAT: RFA
CONTRAT SIGNÉ AVEC: Logo de Devils du New JerseyDevils du New Jersey
VALEUR: 5 450 000 $
% CAP Info-bulle: 6,61
DATE DE SIGNATURE: 3 août 2022
SOURCE: CapFriendly

Jesper Bratt a signé un contrat de 1 ans d'une valeur de 5 450 000 $ avec les Devils du New Jersey, le 3 août 2022. Le contrat comporte un cap hit de 5 450 000 $.

SAISONCLAUSECAP HITInfo-bulleAAV Info-bulleBONIS DE PERFORMANCEInfo-bulleBONIS DE SIGNATUREInfo-bulleSALAIRE DE BASEInfo-bulleSALAIRE TOTALInfo-bulleSALAIRE MINEURESInfo-bulle
2022-235 450 000 $5 450 000 $0 $0 $5 450 000 $5 450 000 $5 450 000 $
TOTAL5 450 000 $5 450 000 $0 $0 $5 450 000 $5 450 000 $5 450 000 $
Icône d'arbitrage demandé
ARBITRAGE: This contract was signed following an arbitration filing
mer. à 10 h 3
#2
feelsbadman
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 45
Mentions "j'aime": 31
Bratt Pack is to blame for this tears of joy
mer. à 10 h 4
#3
Just Keep Swimming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 6,621
Mentions "j'aime": 3,873
Modifié mer. à 18 h 16
This is not the kind of player you bridge.
Woof that is going to bite NJ in the ass

Edit: just to be clear, I think that this is a bad contract as a result and voted no
Civil_Eng_PE, Zuki9797, DrDinkiee and 16 others a aimé ceci.
mer. à 10 h 9
#4
Welcome Simon Nemec
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 2,280
Mentions "j'aime": 1,316
meh
mer. à 10 h 10
#5
Yegor bomb
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 270
Mentions "j'aime": 277
mer. à 10 h 11
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 865
Mentions "j'aime": 422
Likely will be traded next season.
DrDinkiee a aimé ceci.
mer. à 10 h 13
#7
KaapoKakkoFanpage
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 22,052
Mentions "j'aime": 23,977
JBITBPITNHL
Tintin et Chabot4C a aimé ceci.
mer. à 10 h 14
#8
FaulkmyDzingel
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,331
Mentions "j'aime": 1,659
Hmmm. To me this guy just became huge trade bait.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
mer. à 10 h 15
#9
Believe in Bystedt
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 8,759
Mentions "j'aime": 11,365
Palat > Bratt is a choice
mer. à 10 h 28
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 7,566
Mentions "j'aime": 2,745
Quoting: Random2152
This is not the kind of player you bridge.
Woof that is going to bite NJ in the ass


We shall see. He just had a career year and must have wanted to be paid at term for a big chunk more. My guess is 8+ mil mark as a ppg winger.

He went from

His first 5 seasons were 0.47, 0.65, 0.53, 0.65 ppg. Then he jumped last year to 0.96 ppg.

So they want him to prove that was skill and development.

That being said you're right there is risk. Not a bridge, but marners camp offered the leafs 9 mil*8 years before his contract year. As we know when he then had 94 pts, he ended up with about 10.5 mil *6 years.

So they're gambling alright
python3504 et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
mer. à 10 h 28
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 7,566
Mentions "j'aime": 2,745
Quoting: Civil_Eng_PE


Holy ****
Civil_Eng_PE a aimé ceci.
mer. à 10 h 48
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 21,064
Mentions "j'aime": 8,976
The contract itself is fine.

But we are going to regret not offering him a long-term deal ($6.5 million to $7.25 million).
This does allow him to prove up his ability.
But will also make him more expensive next year to lock up long-term ($7.25 million to $8 million)
And, based on track record of recent Arb filers, about half stay with team after 2-years.
mer. à 10 h 51
#13
too dumb to log off
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 7,449
Mentions "j'aime": 8,170
definetely a gamble on the devils part not to secure him long term in the 5-6 mil range. if he regresses you're only looking at saving yourself 500k, if he repeats his previous season than that's gonna be 8 million and over.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
mer. à 11 h 2
#14
feelsbadman
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 45
Mentions "j'aime": 31
Quoting: NHLfan10506
The contract itself is fine.

But we are going to regret not offering him a long-term deal ($6.5 million to $7.25 million).
This does allow him to prove up his ability.
But will also make him more expensive next year to lock up long-term ($7.25 million to $8 million)
And, based on track record of recent Arb filers, about half stay with team after 2-years.


They were apparently offered a deal similar to Nico's and rejected it
mer. à 11 h 3
#15
Lucas Edmonds
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 2,850
Mentions "j'aime": 4,908
Quoting: NHLfan10506
The contract itself is fine.

But we are going to regret not offering him a long-term deal ($6.5 million to $7.25 million).
This does allow him to prove up his ability.
But will also make him more expensive next year to lock up long-term ($7.25 million to $8 million)
And, based on track record of recent Arb filers, about half stay with team after 2-years.


Precisely. It's not a bad contract (and it's definitely very good value for a player of Bratt's caliber), but if he does wind up having another PPG pace season, he's going to need to get PAID (at least $7.5 million AAV, for at least 7 years). Fitzgerald has to know that.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
mer. à 11 h 32
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 21,064
Mentions "j'aime": 8,976
Quoting: hugeballer
They were apparently offered a deal similar to Nico's and rejected it


I believe Nico's contract (7 x $7.25m) was Bratt's ask.
Devils offer was $6.5m...maybe it had gone up. That was around the draft.
mer. à 11 h 36
#17
Josies on vacation
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2020
Messages: 18,167
Mentions "j'aime": 14,984
Yeah this aint great

Reminds me of the Fiala deal that in the end got him traded

Wonder if the same thing happens as if NJ didnt want to commit to Bratt long term that might not sit well with him
mer. à 11 h 36
#18
Lucas Edmonds
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 2,850
Mentions "j'aime": 4,908




And he got $5.45, so they basically split the difference.
mer. à 11 h 37
#19
e
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 429
Mentions "j'aime": 381
good to know we're still tanking
mer. à 12 h 14
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 865
Mentions "j'aime": 422
I never understand why people always vote these kind of deals as good. The 1 year Fiala deal was majority good. The 1 year Reinhart deal was majority good. The Buchnevich deal was majority good. These kind of deals really mess with the player-organization relationship. It's not good at all.
majormoose007 a aimé ceci.
mer. à 12 h 28
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 21,064
Mentions "j'aime": 8,976
Fiala 2021 and Bratt 2022

Similarities

1. Fiala: Team filing: $4m, Player filing: $6.25m, (eventual deal: 1 year x $5.1 million)
2. Bratt: Team filing: $4.15m, Player filing: $6.5m, (eventual deal: 1 year x $5.45 million)


Differences:

1. Cap situation is very different as Minnesota just bought out Parise and Suter. Devils have an estimate $20 million coming off books next year.

2. Minnesota was coming off a season where they had 3rd oldest lineup, Devils are coming off a season where they had youngest roster.

3. Bratt is a bit ahead of Fiala at similar points in their careers. Side-by-side below. But Bratt appears 2-years ahead of Fiala, so NJD should be more willing to make the long-term investment at an earlier point in their careers. Its just going to be more expensive next year.

If anything Minnesota's reluctance is more justified. NJD should have had more incentive to lock up Bratt and didn't.


----

Through D+4 season
Fiala: 140 GP, 35g, 30a, 65pts (0.46 ppg)
Bratt: 185 GP, 37g, 63a, 100pts (0.54 ppg)

Through D+5 season
Fiala: 223 GP, 48g, 56a, 104pts (0.47 ppg)
Bratt: 231 GP, 44g, 86a, 130pts (0.56 ppg)

Through D+6 season
Fiala: 287 GP, 71g, 87a, 158pts (0.55 ppg)
Bratt: 307 GP, 70g, 133a, 203pts (0.66 ppg)

Through D+7 season
Fiala: 337 GP, 91g, 107a, 198pts (0.59 ppg)
Bratt: [2022-23 season]

Through D+8 season
Fiala: 419 GP, 124g, 159a, 283pts (0.68 ppg)
Bratt [2023-24 season]
OldNYIfan et Devil a aimé ceci.
mer. à 12 h 30
#22
Catch me in corners
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 7
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Tough for 1 year - should've looked to avoid arbitration and just sign at 6x6 or something similar.

High likelihood of putting up another solid year as he grows with the team.

Still RFA at the end of the deal. Allows NJ to reassess as they have a handful of pieces expiring too.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
mer. à 12 h 35
#23
v5 CBJ GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2020
Messages: 10,564
Mentions "j'aime": 14,349
Good deal but Devils going to need to do this again next year which is the biggest concern
mer. à 13 h 12
#24
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 262
Mentions "j'aime": 55
Quoting: CapFriendly
Jesper Bratt has signed a new contract with the New Jersey Devils.


I think they made a good bet, worst case they have to pay him his actual value if he happens to do this again, but scoring was way up all over the league. what might happen is he regresses back to his .6 points a game and they can sign him cheaper than they would have this season. its a gamble but i think a good one.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
mer. à 14 h 10
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 4,301
Mentions "j'aime": 2,951
Quoting: DongLord23
I never understand why people always vote these kind of deals as good. The 1 year Fiala deal was majority good. The 1 year Reinhart deal was majority good. The Buchnevich deal was majority good. These kind of deals really mess with the player-organization relationship. It's not good at all.


Because all they look at is the AAV relative to points. This contract is definitely not good for the Devils.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Chargement de l'animation
Soumettre les modifications du sondage