SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

miller at the tdl

Créé par: tea
Équipe: 2022-23 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 30 juill. 2022
Publié: 30 juill. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I feel like this trade is good for both teams. The Avs get a high quality 2nd center to replace Kadri, in exchange for their current 2C, whose more of a middle 6 depth forward, and a top 4 dman. It gives both teams exactly what they need.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
1800 000 $
11 200 000 $
Transactions
1.
VAN
ARI
  1. Poolman, Tucker
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (NYR)
2.
VAN
  1. Compher, J.T.
  2. Girard, Samuel
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (COL)
  4. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (COL)
3.
VAN
CHI
  1. Dickinson, Jason
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (VAN)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de COL
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de COL
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2025
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $79 714 167 $1 250 000 $2 000 000 $2 785 833 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 260 000 $7 260 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
800 000 $800 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
30 juill. 2022 à 10 h 33
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 20,030
Mentions "j'aime": 12,187
that is a very easy decline by the avs, Girard is not being traded for a rental. Miller would just be that, a rental. He is wanting to be paid like one of the top players in the NHL, avs can not afford to even entertain the idea of his contract.

This move only benefits the Cancuks as they get the only cost controlled with term player in the deal.
remowilliams et Xqb15a a aimé ceci.
30 juill. 2022 à 10 h 53
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 1,144
Mentions "j'aime": 387
LMAO
30 juill. 2022 à 11 h 1
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 10,437
Mentions "j'aime": 10,011
CHI declines.
30 juill. 2022 à 11 h 48
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,252
Mentions "j'aime": 8,893
Such an easy no from COL.
30 juill. 2022 à 11 h 48
#5
CoachQ
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 148
Mentions "j'aime": 90
Quoting: Garak
CHI declines.


Garak, not sure why you'd decline it? I know Dickinson is nothing special and would fall into one of the 300 4th liners the Hawks have but the contract isn't bad, and we pick up a 3rd in '24. That's why I'd be interested. I'm not sure we'd get much more for that small a salary.
Knuckl3s a aimé ceci.
30 juill. 2022 à 12 h 22
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 10,437
Mentions "j'aime": 10,011
Quoting: CoachQ
Garak, not sure why you'd decline it? I know Dickinson is nothing special and would fall into one of the 300 4th liners the Hawks have but the contract isn't bad, and we pick up a 3rd in '24. That's why I'd be interested. I'm not sure we'd get much more for that small a salary.


We could use our cap space a lot more effectively than that. His actual cash salary over 2 years is a total of $6.7mil. That is a lot of money and what is most likely to be a mid to late 3rd doesn't pay for that, in my opinion. The Mrazek cap dump was better than this, and that deal sucked.
CoachQ a aimé ceci.
30 juill. 2022 à 12 h 27
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 3,629
Mentions "j'aime": 1,515
Overpay by the Avs.
30 juill. 2022 à 12 h 28
#8
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: coga16
that is a very easy decline by the avs, Girard is not being traded for a rental. Miller would just be that, a rental. He is wanting to be paid like one of the top players in the NHL, avs can not afford to even entertain the idea of his contract.

This move only benefits the Cancuks as they get the only cost controlled with term player in the deal.


Avs would absolutely consider trading Girard for a rental
30 juill. 2022 à 13 h 0
#9
Démarrer sujet
i dunno
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 1,080
Mentions "j'aime": 293
Quoting: Konkarsson
LMAO


Quoting: Xqb15a
Such an easy no from COL.


Quoting: delneggs
Overpay by the Avs.


It is an overpay, but it's the trade deadline, every team overpays at the trade deadline if it means they can win in the playoffs. Unless Newhook takes a massive step this year, they don't really have a 2C. Compher is not even close to an answer, Miller would be.

Compher is probably leaving either way, since they have to resign Byram, Newhook, give MacKinnon a raise, etc, there's no way they could fit him in under the cap. Furthermore, with Olausson showing a lot of promise, it's likely he'll replace Compher on the 3rd line as soon as 23-24.

It's well known that Colorado has tried to trade Girard as recently as last year, and it's not unreasonable to assume they'd give him up to fill that 2C slot. It's a high price to pay, but it's worth it, and it'd also free up a spot in the top 4 for Byram who should soon be better than Girard either way. The 1st is gonna be late as well, so they'll be fine with giving it up.

It's not as ridiculous of a trade as y'all seem to think.
Knuckl3s a aimé ceci.
30 juill. 2022 à 14 h 20
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,252
Mentions "j'aime": 8,893
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Avs would absolutely consider trading Girard for a rental

They absolutely 100% would not. 5 years of a top 4 dmen on sweet heart contract that’s dumb.
30 juill. 2022 à 14 h 24
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,252
Mentions "j'aime": 8,893
Quoting: tea
It is an overpay, but it's the trade deadline, every team overpays at the trade deadline if it means they can win in the playoffs. Unless Newhook takes a massive step this year, they don't really have a 2C. Compher is not even close to an answer, Miller would be.

Compher is probably leaving either way, since they have to resign Byram, Newhook, give MacKinnon a raise, etc, there's no way they could fit him in under the cap. Furthermore, with Olausson showing a lot of promise, it's likely he'll replace Compher on the 3rd line as soon as 23-24.

It's well known that Colorado has tried to trade Girard as recently as last year, and it's not unreasonable to assume they'd give him up to fill that 2C slot. It's a high price to pay, but it's worth it, and it'd also free up a spot in the top 4 for Byram who should soon be better than Girard either way. The 1st is gonna be late as well, so they'll be fine with giving it up.

It's not as ridiculous of a trade as y'all seem to think.


It totally is. MacKinnon contract covered by EJ’s expiring deal. Byram by Compher’s. COL didn’t pick until the 6th rd this year, trading the 1st In 23 means no pick until the 5th rd, they aren’t skipping 2 drafts and trading trading a top 4 dman locked up long term for a rental. It’s absurd.
30 juill. 2022 à 15 h 20
#12
Démarrer sujet
i dunno
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 1,080
Mentions "j'aime": 293
Quoting: Xqb15a
It totally is. MacKinnon contract covered by EJ’s expiring deal. Byram by Compher’s. COL didn’t pick until the 6th rd this year, trading the 1st In 23 means no pick until the 5th rd, they aren’t skipping 2 drafts and trading trading a top 4 dman locked up long term for a rental. It’s absurd.


Girard also frees up money for a Miller extension, and most of the core is locked up long-term. It's essentially slightly weakening an elite dcore in exchange for filling the biggest hole in the lineup, potentially for the next few years. Especially considering the fact that few centers of Miller's caliber are currently on the market, and he'll be the only option if Kadri decides to leave
30 juill. 2022 à 17 h 44
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,252
Mentions "j'aime": 8,893
Quoting: tea
Girard also frees up money for a Miller extension, and most of the core is locked up long-term. It's essentially slightly weakening an elite dcore in exchange for filling the biggest hole in the lineup, potentially for the next few years. Especially considering the fact that few centers of Miller's caliber are currently on the market, and he'll be the only option if Kadri decides to leave

If they are trading Girard for that reason that do it now and just sign Kadri. COL isn’t trading for Miller it doesn’t make any sense especially including Girard in that trade.
30 juill. 2022 à 21 h 14
#14
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: Xqb15a
They absolutely 100% would not. 5 years of a top 4 dmen on sweet heart contract that’s dumb.


Girard is nowhere near the caliber of player Miller is, and the Avs are continuing to try and win NOW, not later
30 juill. 2022 à 22 h 35
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,252
Mentions "j'aime": 8,893
Quoting: Knuckl3s
Girard is nowhere near the caliber of player Miller is, and the Avs are continuing to try and win NOW, not later

Who cares they can’t re-sign Miller they aren’t throwing away a prime asset for a rental whom they won the cup without anyway.
30 juill. 2022 à 22 h 47
#16
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 12,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,630
Quoting: Xqb15a
Who cares they can’t re-sign Miller they aren’t throwing away a prime asset for a rental whom they won the cup without anyway.


So they won't need Girard to help them win a cup next time around, problem solved lol

Not saying that they're going to or should give him away for nothing, but you could argue it makes him just that much more expendable
30 juill. 2022 à 22 h 50
#17
Démarrer sujet
i dunno
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 1,080
Mentions "j'aime": 293
Quoting: Xqb15a
Who cares they can’t re-sign Miller they aren’t throwing away a prime asset for a rental whom they won the cup without anyway.


They didn't win a cup with Miller, they did with Kadri. Would they win a cup with Compher? Maybe, maybe not. If they're gonna win, they're gonna need a top tier 2C, that's what Miller is. Compher is gone anyway, Girard is bound to drop out of the top 4 next year, as Byram keeps developing, and if they can't resign Miller, they can at least bridge the gap until Newhook's good enough to take over. Either way, the Avs win. They either let Newhook go next year, and resign Miller, or let Miller go and replace him with Newhook.
Knuckl3s a aimé ceci.
30 juill. 2022 à 22 h 53
#18
Démarrer sujet
i dunno
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 1,080
Mentions "j'aime": 293
Quoting: Xqb15a
If they are trading Girard for that reason that do it now and just sign Kadri. COL isn’t trading for Miller it doesn’t make any sense especially including Girard in that trade.


You're really overrating Girards value to this team. The Avs have an excess amount of top 4 dmen, (I count 6 in total), so shipping one off to fill a crucial hole in the lineup is absolutely worth it. As I previously stated, Compher is negligible, since he's gone at the end of the year either way, and he's very replaceable. 3rd line scoring is not too difficult to find, especially when you have prospects like Newhook and Olausson. You know what is difficult to find? Top tier 2C's.
Knuckl3s a aimé ceci.
31 juill. 2022 à 2 h 24
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,252
Mentions "j'aime": 8,893
Quoting: tea
You're really overrating Girards value to this team. The Avs have an excess amount of top 4 dmen, (I count 6 in total), so shipping one off to fill a crucial hole in the lineup is absolutely worth it. As I previously stated, Compher is negligible, since he's gone at the end of the year either way, and he's very replaceable. 3rd line scoring is not too difficult to find, especially when you have prospects like Newhook and Olausson. You know what is difficult to find? Top tier 2C's.


I’m not overrating Girard a 24yr old puck moving too 4 dman locked up for the duration of his prime years when EJ has one year left and Toews 2 because they won’t be able to re-sign him. If anything you are grossly undervaluing him his contract and his play. Newhook had a 33pt rookie year playing on the 3rd line as a 21yr old. You don’t give away young proven dmen locked up long term for rentals.
31 juill. 2022 à 2 h 29
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,252
Mentions "j'aime": 8,893
Quoting: tea
They didn't win a cup with Miller, they did with Kadri. Would they win a cup with Compher? Maybe, maybe not. If they're gonna win, they're gonna need a top tier 2C, that's what Miller is. Compher is gone anyway, Girard is bound to drop out of the top 4 next year, as Byram keeps developing, and if they can't resign Miller, they can at least bridge the gap until Newhook's good enough to take over. Either way, the Avs win. They either let Newhook go next year, and resign Miller, or let Miller go and replace him with Newhook.


Why would Girard drop out of the top 4? Because of Manson or EJ? Get real. COL switches up pairings all the time during games, and I guarantee he finishes no worse than 4th in TOI on the d. He was averaging 20+ minutes in the playoffs with Manson and EJ in the line up.
31 juill. 2022 à 2 h 33
#21
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,252
Mentions "j'aime": 8,893
Quoting: Knuckl3s
So they won't need Girard to help them win a cup next time around, problem solved lol

Not saying that they're going to or should give him away for nothing, but you could argue it makes him just that much more expendable


Really and what do they do when EJ inevitably gets hurt, then retires and Toews walks for a monster contract in 2years. I could buy if they didn’t move their top 2 d prospects in Barron and Helleson at the trade deadline, and outside of Behrens who won’t be ready for probably 3 years they have zero close to the NHL ready dmen.
Knuckl3s a aimé ceci.
31 juill. 2022 à 9 h 18
#22
Démarrer sujet
i dunno
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 1,080
Mentions "j'aime": 293
Quoting: Xqb15a
Why would Girard drop out of the top 4? Because of Manson or EJ? Get real. COL switches up pairings all the time during games, and I guarantee he finishes no worse than 4th in TOI on the d. He was averaging 20+ minutes in the playoffs with Manson and EJ in the line up.


I didn't say because Manson or EJ, I said because Byram. And once again they have tried to trade him in the past with this exact d-core. He's not necessary.

I also feel like you're missing the point of this post, it's not like I was considering the Avs needs a lot. They need a 2C, we need a top 4 dman, Byram, Toews, and Makar are untouchable, EJ's contract wouldn't fit, and Manson is not enough of a return for Miller. Simple as that.

That's what championship teams do, they balance needs. If they have an overflow in defenseman, they move a piece to maybe upgrade the forward core. If they have excess in goalies, they'll might move them to gain center depth.

Girard isn't irreplaceable, they already have Byram as a replacement. The Lightning only really had 2 or 3 great offensive defenseman during their cup runs, Hedman, Sergy, and McDonagh, and the Avs currently have Makar, Toews, Byram, Girard, and arguably EJ. Moving one of them is completely fine if it means filling the biggest hole in the lineup.
31 juill. 2022 à 9 h 29
#23
Démarrer sujet
i dunno
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 1,080
Mentions "j'aime": 293
Quoting: Xqb15a
Why would Girard drop out of the top 4? Because of Manson or EJ? Get real. COL switches up pairings all the time during games, and I guarantee he finishes no worse than 4th in TOI on the d. He was averaging 20+ minutes in the playoffs with Manson and EJ in the line up.


As it stands their top 4 is Toews - Makar, Girard - Manson. They're gonna wanna move Byram into the top 4 next year, so unless they want to run two RD's on the 3rd pairing, Girard would get moved down. Also, as you mentioned Behrens does exist. He could probably make the team next year, or the year after. If not, it's not like there isn't free agency or the trade deadline
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage