SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Lundell for Byram - who says no

Créé par: Richard88
Équipe: 2022-23 Avalanche du Colorado
Date de création initiale: 29 juill. 2022
Publié: 29 juill. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Just for the sake of discussion...

A trade like this fills each teams biggest need using their biggest areas of strength.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
12 000 000 $
Transactions
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
2024
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
2025
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
Logo de COL
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2182 500 000 $79 983 333 $25 000 $1 912 500 $2 516 667 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
908 333 $908 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
912 500 $912 500 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 5
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
987 500 $987 500 $
DG/DD, AG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
29 juill. 2022 à 8 h 51
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,645
Mentions "j'aime": 14,429
Man that's a tough one.

Super interesting idea.

Maybe Colorado due to injury concerns and difference in ELC years left and value in center vs lhd
csick et SevenLeg a aimé ceci.
29 juill. 2022 à 8 h 53
#2
Hop on the Slaftrain
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 16,165
Mentions "j'aime": 20,486
I think this is as close as it gets
Lenny7 a aimé ceci.
29 juill. 2022 à 8 h 53
#3
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Why ya gotta do this! Incredibly tough. IMO, if I'm the Panthers, I'd be sticking with Lundell, but it's pretty friggin' close.
BigBallsBriere a aimé ceci.
29 juill. 2022 à 9 h 4
#4
retired
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 8,893
Mentions "j'aime": 4,761
close but i'd rather keep byram. he was phenomenal in the finals.
Foppa21 et ArakinSkywalker a aimé ceci.
29 juill. 2022 à 9 h 7
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,048
Mentions "j'aime": 847
I feel like this is a pretty solid hockey trade of good young player for good young player. Both teams may say no due to GMs wanting to keep the guy they drafted, but it could work for both teams.
Max of like a fifth going one way for whichever team feels like they need a bit more value.
Lenny7 a aimé ceci.
29 juill. 2022 à 9 h 11
#6
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: sabresparaavida
I feel like this is a pretty solid hockey trade of good young player for good young player. Both teams may say no due to GMs wanting to keep the guy they drafted, but it could work for both teams.
Max of like a fifth going one way for whichever team feels like they need a bit more value.


Yeah, it's one of those trades that, IMO, ends up making one GM look like a genius, and the other like an idiot 5 years down the road. Not sure which GM that'd be, but yeah, I think they'd just both add elsewhere to avoid the potential of that happening.
29 juill. 2022 à 9 h 11
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 3,579
Mentions "j'aime": 3,440
Avs say no for sure imo. Byram is just too perfect a fit for their team both on the ice and for future roster building purposes. Plus they have Newhook, who almost certainly won't be as good as Lundell, but still has 2C potential. They also have their 1st round picks.

Panthers might say no too, but it's closer for them (imo) since they have forward depth but are lacking on D (with nothing in the pipe either).
Xqb15a, Foppa21 et ArakinSkywalker a aimé ceci.
29 juill. 2022 à 9 h 16
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2017
Messages: 1,115
Mentions "j'aime": 1,315
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
Man that's a tough one.

Super interesting idea.

Maybe Colorado due to injury concerns and difference in ELC years left and value in center vs lhd


Bo has his injury concerns as well. With his Concussions this year some people thought he might not even be able to play again.
29 juill. 2022 à 9 h 17
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,645
Mentions "j'aime": 14,429
Quoting: Anus_McLeod
Avs say no for sure imo. Byram is just too perfect a fit for their team both on the ice and for future roster building purposes. Plus they have Newhook, who almost certainly won't be as good as Lundell, but still has 2C potential. They also have their 1st round picks.

Panthers might say no too, but it's closer for them (imo) since they have forward depth but are lacking on D (with nothing in the pipe either).


Colorado has defensive depth with makar, toews and Girard.

Lundell also plays a much more valuable position and doesn't have concussion history AND has 2 elc years left vs 1.

It's tough
29 juill. 2022 à 9 h 17
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,645
Mentions "j'aime": 14,429
Quoting: DangleCat
Bo has his injury concerns as well. With his Concussions this year some people thought he might not even be able to play again.


That was exactly what I was saying, Colorado might have to add for that reason
29 juill. 2022 à 9 h 18
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 1,431
Mentions "j'aime": 852
Avalanche say no imo, especially after the playoffs Byram just had.
Xqb15a et DirtyDangle a aimé ceci.
29 juill. 2022 à 9 h 25
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 3,579
Mentions "j'aime": 3,440
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
Colorado has defensive depth with makar, toews and Girard.

Lundell also plays a much more valuable position and doesn't have concussion history AND has 2 elc years left vs 1.

It's tough


I think it's highly debatable whether a cornerstone D is more or less valuable than a cornerstone C. It's equal in my eyes, and left vs right doesn't matter to me.

The Avs are very much built on the foundation of puck moving defensemen, and I don't think they'll have both Girard and Toews past the next couple seasons. That's why Byram isn't going anywhere. And again, they believe in Newhook, making Lundell less of a need.

Just to be clear, I do value Lundell very, very highly. His value in a vacuum is very close if not equal to Byram's. That's my assessment of how the respective FOs would think.
29 juill. 2022 à 9 h 31
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,352
Mentions "j'aime": 9,005
COL and imo it isn’t close. Byram at 21 is an top 4 dman on a Stanley cup champion and is a #1 dman in the making now. Lundell is great but he I don’t think he is ever a 1C.
ArakinSkywalker a aimé ceci.
29 juill. 2022 à 9 h 35
#14
retired
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 8,893
Mentions "j'aime": 4,761
Quoting: Xqb15a
COL and imo it isn’t close. Byram at 21 is an top 4 dman on a Stanley cup champion and is a #1 dman in the making now. Lundell is great but he I don’t think he is ever a 1C.


you had me right up until the end.
29 juill. 2022 à 9 h 43
#15
StevieY19!!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,068
Mentions "j'aime": 690
I love this trade makes the most sense to me for both clubs. Now as far as value, personally I think it is very close but, you could argue a small pick going one way or the other. Otherwise, I love this idea just purely for the excitement it would cause in the hockey fandom world and I am not a fan of either of these teams.
29 juill. 2022 à 9 h 47
#16
exo2769
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 15,603
Mentions "j'aime": 9,697
Quoting: Xqb15a
COL and imo it isn’t close. Byram at 21 is an top 4 dman on a Stanley cup champion and is a #1 dman in the making now. Lundell is great but he I don’t think he is ever a 1C.


This is your bias speaking. Are you an AVEs fan? It's just your bias, that's all. Not trying to say you're being mean. Not trying to say that at all. Just that you follow Byram ALOT more than you follow Lundell.

I think this is a lose/lose. Byram has the potential to be a Top Pair Dman. He won't be Makar, but still very good. Lundell has the ability to be a #1C...he won't be Matthews/McDavid, but still very good. Swapping them doesn't really look good for either of them IMO. Each team would be giving up on their best prospect.
29 juill. 2022 à 11 h 23
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 11,352
Mentions "j'aime": 9,005
Quoting: exo2769
This is your bias speaking. Are you an AVEs fan? It's just your bias, that's all. Not trying to say you're being mean. Not trying to say that at all. Just that you follow Byram ALOT more than you follow Lundell.

I think this is a lose/lose. Byram has the potential to be a Top Pair Dman. He won't be Makar, but still very good. Lundell has the ability to be a #1C...he won't be Matthews/McDavid, but still very good. Swapping them doesn't really look good for either of them IMO. Each team would be giving up on their best prospect.


I don’t think Lundell ends up being a 1C for the same reason he wasn’t a top 10 pick, his skating. Yeah I have some bias but Byram was playing a near dominate role leading the Cup Playoffs in 5v5 TOI with an insane 61 CF. Hell I’d love to have Lundell on my team but not at the expense of Byram and I’m willing to bet most of the GM’s in the league would agree with me.
29 juill. 2022 à 12 h 8
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 1,136
Mentions "j'aime": 444
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
Man that's a tough one.

Super interesting idea.

Maybe Colorado due to injury concerns and difference in ELC years left and value in center vs lhd


The injury concerns are about Byram, not Lundell, right? Lundell didn't have any concerns during the last season

Edit: you cleared that up with the other confused guy. I read it as Colorado says no because of Byram's injury concerns and it puzzled me
29 juill. 2022 à 12 h 18
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2017
Messages: 27,645
Mentions "j'aime": 14,429
Quoting: RaZZe
The injury concerns are about Byram, not Lundell, right? Lundell didn't have any concerns during the last season

Edit: you cleared that up with the other confused guy. I read it as Colorado says no because of Byram's injury concerns and it puzzled me


I blanked and thought it said who adds
RaZZe a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage