SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

the demise

Créé par: CP11
Équipe: 2022-23 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 27 juill. 2022
Publié: 27 juill. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Trades are potentially off but realistic destinations for both players. All for fun!
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1875 000 $
1900 000 $
22 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
11 100 000 $
12 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
NYR
  1. Kane, Patrick (5 250 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (TBL)
3.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de DAL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2025
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $74 154 296 $237 500 $1 675 000 $8 345 704 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Hurricanes de la Caroline
4 820 000 $4 820 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
875 000 $875 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
758 333 $758 333 $
AD
RFA - 2
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
758 333 $758 333 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 175 000 $2 175 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
900 000 $900 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
975 000 $975 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 juill. 2022 à 23 h 21
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 672
Mentions "j'aime": 281
I would rather have 8 years of KK instead of one year of toews. The only player on the hawks I would be comfortable trading KK for is… honestly no one piece I would trade KK for straight up on the hawks. Seth jones is on an awful contract and the only players of actual value have already been traded or have one year left on their deal. And the audacity to add 2 prospects to that deal. Please stop.
Fox_Czar_Cup a aimé ceci.
27 juill. 2022 à 23 h 22
#2
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 1,502
Mentions "j'aime": 578
Easiest PASS in history for the Rangers.
27 juill. 2022 à 23 h 22
#3
go Sharks go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 862
Mentions "j'aime": 396
Sharks decline, LD is not a need and Hill is worth a 3rd/4th which has more value than Phillips
27 juill. 2022 à 23 h 23
#4
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2022
Messages: 1,502
Mentions "j'aime": 578
Quoting: Fotiu4U
Easiest PASS in history for the Rangers.


A better trade is Kane to the Islanders for Barzal, Dobson and a 1st round pick.
Fox_Czar_Cup a aimé ceci.
27 juill. 2022 à 23 h 24
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,025
Mentions "j'aime": 3,568
All 3 teams decline
Jco5ta5 a aimé ceci.
27 juill. 2022 à 23 h 27
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 4,986
Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
Toews is more likely to return to Canada IMO

Phillips has got good rapport in the organisation and I doubt they move him to accomodate another goalie which isn't needed.

Kane to NYR I feel works for all involved though would come down to how things are looking at the TDL and what overall package the NYR can put together.
27 juill. 2022 à 23 h 31
#7
B
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2016
Messages: 7,862
Mentions "j'aime": 1,423
Quoting: SJSGM
Sharks decline, LD is not a need and Hill is worth a 3rd/4th which has more value than Phillips

Quoting: glarson17
All 3 teams decline


He's a good prospect and Hill is an overpaid ahler
27 juill. 2022 à 23 h 36
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,025
Mentions "j'aime": 3,568
Quoting: Fox_Czar_Cup
He's a good prospect and Hill is an overpaid ahler


Lol no Hill isn’t. 2.66 gaa and .906 sv% isn’t ahl level. Lankinen has ahl numbers.
SJSGM a aimé ceci.
27 juill. 2022 à 23 h 54
#9
New York Rangers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 1,735
Mentions "j'aime": 517
NYR decline, we can pursue him in free agency, given the fact that he is not going back to your poor excuse of a team.
27 juill. 2022 à 23 h 58
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,134
Mentions "j'aime": 4,979
KK holds more value than Toews right now. You might get a 2nd if you retain half of his deal and eat Gardiner too.
27 juill. 2022 à 23 h 59
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 3,612
Mentions "j'aime": 3,044
KK is signed for 8 years and is 22 while Toews is on the wrong side of 30 and a pending UFA
28 juill. 2022 à 0 h 12
#12
Hawks Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 2,590
Mentions "j'aime": 1,598
Quoting: Finski
NYR decline, we can pursue him in free agency, given the fact that he is not going back to your poor excuse of a team.


Getting Kane as a UFA will cost you $8-9.5M and you won’t have him for the 22/23 playoff run at 50% off.
28 juill. 2022 à 8 h 13
#13
go Sharks go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 862
Mentions "j'aime": 396
Quoting: Fox_Czar_Cup
He's a good prospect and Hill is an overpaid ahler


lol Hill is a perfectly fine backup and is still fairly young for a goalie
28 juill. 2022 à 16 h 10
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 65
Mentions "j'aime": 10
Quoting: Cardiac
I would rather have 8 years of KK instead of one year of toews. The only player on the hawks I would be comfortable trading KK for is… honestly no one piece I would trade KK for straight up on the hawks. Seth jones is on an awful contract and the only players of actual value have already been traded or have one year left on their deal. And the audacity to add 2 prospects to that deal. Please stop.


Honestly I wasn't too sure how canes fans felt about KK. Seemed like there wasn't a perfect fit for him last year and plenty of great forward prospects on entry level to replace with a need for cap space. Maybe Toews doesn't work because of cap problem and Necas is RFA with not enough current cap space to sign him. Figured after losing Trocheck and adding guys like Burns, Pacioretty they'd be interested in Toews. Potentially resigns as well. Toews is 34 but he is still playing good hockey but agreed I sent too much back. I was thinking KK's contract was kinda a problem but I now believe with expiring contracts they will be able to work it out.
28 juill. 2022 à 16 h 14
#15
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 65
Mentions "j'aime": 10
Quoting: SJSGM
Sharks decline, LD is not a need and Hill is worth a 3rd/4th which has more value than Phillips


My thought process was Sharks do not need 3 NHL contract goalies. Also only 4 AHL Defensemen under contract right now. Phillips is 20 years old and seemed like a good prospect to send back. While if Mrazek gets hurt, Blackhawks are screwed. Which I'm not sure if they'd mind for 1st round draft position lol.
28 juill. 2022 à 16 h 49
#16
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 672
Mentions "j'aime": 281
Quoting: CP11
Honestly I wasn't too sure how canes fans felt about KK. Seemed like there wasn't a perfect fit for him last year and plenty of great forward prospects on entry level to replace with a need for cap space. Maybe Toews doesn't work because of cap problem and Necas is RFA with not enough current cap space to sign him. Figured after losing Trocheck and adding guys like Burns, Pacioretty they'd be interested in Toews. Potentially resigns as well. Toews is 34 but he is still playing good hockey but agreed I sent too much back. I was thinking KK's contract was kinda a problem but I now believe with expiring contracts they will be able to work it out.


As a canes fan I am super high on KK. He honestly wasn’t given a good shot this past season. He played primarily on the 4th line with guys who didn’t put up more than 25 points. He did play on the wing at the start of the season but he played poorly when on the wing even though it was with better players. His natural position is center and it’s what he has been groomed since Junior to play. If he swapped positions with trocheck in terms of minutes and linemates, I think he would have preformed much much better than trocheck did. His shooting percentage was higher than trochecks and his points per minute was higher than trochecks. On top of the fact he played with worse linemates, I have super high hopes for KK. I wouldn’t be surprised if he put up 70+ points this season but my expectation is at least 55 points if he plays 82 games. Very exciting player and I know a lot of people were confused with the contract but I think he will live up to it this season and continue to improve throughout the contract making it one of the best in the coming years.
28 juill. 2022 à 18 h 39
#17
New York Rangers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 1,735
Mentions "j'aime": 517
Quoting: Jco5ta5
Getting Kane as a UFA will cost you $8-9.5M and you won’t have him for the 22/23 playoff run at 50% off.


Well then no need for him!
28 juill. 2022 à 21 h 56
#18
go Sharks go
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 862
Mentions "j'aime": 396
Quoting: CP11
My thought process was Sharks do not need 3 NHL contract goalies. Also only 4 AHL Defensemen under contract right now. Phillips is 20 years old and seemed like a good prospect to send back. While if Mrazek gets hurt, Blackhawks are screwed. Which I'm not sure if they'd mind for 1st round draft position lol.


correct, we don’t need 3 goalies, but we also don’t need LD. After we sign Ferraro, we will have 6 NHL level LD. Some are old and some have short term contracts, but guys like Ferraro and Kniazev are young and most likely part of San Jose’s long term plans. Hatakka and Knyzhov are both young guys in the AHL who also have decent potential. I also agree with the idea that Blackhawks might be happy if they don’t have any good goalies lol. Sharks prob try to get a mid round pick for him.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage