Seattle easily says no. Gonna have to give up more than a 6th next year for a defenseman who is better and cheaper.

That Kraken trade man. Leafs fans are funnny

Crouse is a stud. The leafs would have to be the team adding a pick.

. . . not to mention almost 4 years younger.

I love you leaf haters; I wouldn’t make that trade but in no world is Larson better than Muzzin. Salary and injuries factor in but one has won Stanley cups and world cups and one was left exposed for expansion draft.

Just as patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel, accusing a disinterested fan of being guilty of team-wide bias is the last refuge of an adherent that has no legitimate argument. Basing your evaluation of a player's worth today on his performance in 2012 and 2014 is a mug's game.

By the way, tell me again about Muzzin winning more than one Stanley Cup.

2014 Stanley cup, 2016 World Cup. Sidney Crosby last won a cup in 2017…Larson was just exposed last year by a team with almost no nhl caliber defenders, but sure he’s top shelf. If you think Larson is better than muzzin, then we disagree.

Larsson was exposed because his contract was expiring and he'd already told Edmonton that he wasn't re-signing. He got selected in the expansion draft and immediately signed his new contract, which contains an absolute NTC until next summer.

How do you know that, are you his agent? Oilers chose to leave him unexposed as they valued other dmen above him. And then he signed for mid level money on an expansion team, hardly a top dman. Muzzin has been a top dman for most of his career; injuries have hurt past few years but I repeat - no way Larson is better than muzzin

The Oilers chose to leave him exposed because he was a UFA. If you don't want to acknowledge the reality of that, fine.