SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

whos there left for the top 4 D

Créé par: zizougaffar
Équipe: 2022-23 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 23 juill. 2022
Publié: 23 juill. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
man, idk who could the Sens target for the top 4 D other than Chychrun. Tanev or Andersson maybe but I don't see the flames trading them (esp Andersson), even if they have many players playing on the right side. Maybe Carlo, but again, Boston's prob planning to compete at least this season. Klingberg is a great OFD, but we are not really in need for that right now, unless they pair him with Sanderson and let Sanderson take care of the defensive part, even as the biggest Sanderson believer it's risky to do that.

(Batherson and Formenton are in this in case they are cleared from the hockey canada 2018 scandal, if they aint they are removed from the team)
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 500 000 $
11 500 000 $
43 500 000 $
Transactions
ARI
  1. Bernard-Docker, Jacob
  2. Järventie, Roby
  3. Sokolov, Egor
  4. Zaitsev, Nikita
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (OTT)
  6. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (WSH)
Détails additionnels:
Top 5 protected
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de NSH
2024
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de TBL
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2182 500 000 $78 459 881 $0 $4 025 000 $4 040 119 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 205 714 $8 205 714 $
AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
7 950 000 $7 950 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 975 000 $4 975 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AD, C
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG
RFA
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
762 500 $762 500 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
950 000 $950 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 666 667 $3 666 667 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
23 juill. 2022 à 0 h 35
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 9,527
Mentions "j'aime": 8,968
sam girard, jakob chychrun, or klingberg on a 1 year deal would be the best options tbh. maybe we can swing a brannstrom to LAK for one of their RD deal (like durzi or roy)
23 juill. 2022 à 0 h 39
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 573
Mentions "j'aime": 242
Quoting: Alfie11
sam girard, jakob chychrun, or klingberg on a 1 year deal would be the best options tbh. maybe we can swing a brannstrom to LAK for one of their RD deal (like durzi or roy)


Girard seems like the type of player that the sens are not looking for. By that, I mean his size is probably the thing that is stopping the sens from getting him. He's a great player, but they already have one in Branny and they don't like him already, at least DJ does not, Dorion traded for him. I like the idea of getting a RD from the kings, although i would prefer Roy over Durzi because Durzi seems like a Klingberg lite
23 juill. 2022 à 1 h 18
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 9,527
Mentions "j'aime": 8,968
Quoting: zizougaffar
Girard seems like the type of player that the sens are not looking for. By that, I mean his size is probably the thing that is stopping the sens from getting him. He's a great player, but they already have one in Branny and they don't like him already, at least DJ does not, Dorion traded for him. I like the idea of getting a RD from the kings, although i would prefer Roy over Durzi because Durzi seems like a Klingberg lite

Eh at least Durzi could run PP2. Roy is better defensively though. And presumably Brannstrom would be either part of the package for Girard, or shipped out separately, perhaps in the Zaitsev dump (Chabot-Zub / Sanderson-Girard / Holden-Hamonic)
zizougaffar a aimé ceci.
23 juill. 2022 à 1 h 20
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 573
Mentions "j'aime": 242
Quoting: Alfie11
Eh at least Durzi could run PP2. Roy is better defensively though. And presumably Brannstrom would be either part of the package for Girard, or shipped out separately, perhaps in the Zaitsev dump (Chabot-Zub / Sanderson-Girard / Holden-Hamonic)


I mean would definitly not mind having Girard, but I think Dj would oppose having him cuz of his size, even though he was decent in the playoffs
23 juill. 2022 à 1 h 22
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 9,527
Mentions "j'aime": 8,968
Quoting: zizougaffar
I mean would definitly not mind having Girard, but I think Dj would oppose having him cuz of his size, even though he was decent in the playoffs

If DJ can’t work with anyone under 6’1” then DJ won’t be working for the Sens for long lol. I’m personally of the opinion that we’re probably gonna have a new coach when we enter our window, so I wouldn’t be surprised if he’s gone in the next season or two, and Girard is good enough that if you can get him for an affordable price in terms of assets then you should definitely do that.
23 juill. 2022 à 1 h 29
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 573
Mentions "j'aime": 242
Quoting: Alfie11
If DJ can’t work with anyone under 6’1” then DJ won’t be working for the Sens for long lol. I’m personally of the opinion that we’re probably gonna have a new coach when we enter our window, so I wouldn’t be surprised if he’s gone in the next season or two, and Girard is good enough that if you can get him for an affordable price in terms of assets then you should definitely do that.


I think, there is some truth to having a bit of size on defense in order to be successful in the playoffs, if we look at the last few cup winners, they almost all had defenders over 6'0 atleast, only exception was the avs with Girard, but he only played like 7 games cuz of injuries, so he wasnt as effective this playoffs. As for DJ, I still could see him lead us into our winning window, the players seem to like him and they really love to play for him and he makes sure everyone gives their best effort out on the ice. Now is he a great coach, prob not, but he is still a young one who can and prob has learned alot along the way. Only way i see him gone is if the team has a shambolic start that can't be attributed to smth else (i.e covid or injuries)
23 juill. 2022 à 1 h 35
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 9,527
Mentions "j'aime": 8,968
Quoting: zizougaffar
I think, there is some truth to having a bit of size on defense in order to be successful in the playoffs, if we look at the last few cup winners, they almost all had defenders over 6'0 atleast, only exception was the avs with Girard, but he only played like 7 games cuz of injuries, so he wasnt as effective this playoffs. As for DJ, I still could see him lead us into our winning window, the players seem to like him and they really love to play for him and he makes sure everyone gives their best effort out on the ice. Now is he a great coach, prob not, but he is still a young one who can and prob has learned alot along the way. Only way i see him gone is if the team has a shambolic start that can't be attributed to smth else (i.e covid or injuries)

I mean Makar is under 6’ as well, but regardless, Girard would be our only small guy. You can have one, maybe two, and be fine imo. Chabot, Sanderson, Zub, Kleven, JBD, Thomson can fill out the long term lineup with plenty of size. I think that if we bring in a top 4 D, the expectation should be playoffs, and DJ might be gone if we fall short of that. If we don’t get another top 4 D or face a bunch of major injuries again then maybe he has a longer leash.
zizougaffar a aimé ceci.
23 juill. 2022 à 1 h 39
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 573
Mentions "j'aime": 242
Quoting: Alfie11
I mean Makar is under 6’ as well, but regardless, Girard would be our only small guy. You can have one, maybe two, and be fine imo. Chabot, Sanderson, Zub, Kleven, JBD, Thomson can fill out the long term lineup with plenty of size. I think that if we bring in a top 4 D, the expectation should be playoffs, and DJ might be gone if we fall short of that. If we don’t get another top 4 D or face a bunch of major injuries again then maybe he has a longer leash.


ngl, i forgot Makar was 5'11, the way he plays makes you think he's a 6'0 foot player, but I guess that debunks my theory. The expectations this year has to be playoffs or at least be in the race for it at the end of the season, and if we aren't achieving either, DJ is long gone, esp if Dorion gets him that top 4 D
Alfie11 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage