SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

how it could work

Équipe: 2023-24 Rangers de New York
Date de création initiale: 21 juill. 2022
Publié: 21 juill. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
2925 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 750 000 $
65 750 000 $
12 350 000 $
22 750 000 $
64 000 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Depth D, De
1775 000 $
Transactions
NYR
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (ANA)
Détails additionnels:
any team, not sure on the return
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de COL
Logo de NYR
Logo de WPG
Logo de NYR
2024
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de ANA
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
2025
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
Logo de NYR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $83 917 082 $610 892 $1 472 500 $-417 082 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Rangers de New York
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
11 642 857 $11 642 857 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
C, AD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
2 350 000 $2 350 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance450 000 $$450K)
AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $
AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 641 667 $3 641 667 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
828 333 $828 333 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AG
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
5 666 667 $5 666 667 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Rangers de New York
828 333 $828 333 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
797 500 $797 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Rangers de New York
762 500 $762 500 $
C
UFA - 1
Depth D, De
775 000 $775 000 $

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
21 juill. 2022 à 16 h 6
#1
LosPatos
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 3,315
Mentions "j'aime": 1,823
Ducks actually could bite on this. They need a defensive veteran who can eat TOI
21 juill. 2022 à 16 h 8
#2
MGITBPITNHL
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,495
Mentions "j'aime": 1,530
Not worth moving Lindgren to give the 3C a 6x4. Just put Goodrow there next season
21 juill. 2022 à 16 h 26
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 199
Mentions "j'aime": 44
Really, really hoping we can move Trouba next season.
21 juill. 2022 à 16 h 30
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 2,988
Mentions "j'aime": 877
Chytil's fate was sealed the second they signed Trocheck. He's out. They'll find a cheaper 3C option or just plug Goodrow in.
Masonh618 a aimé ceci.
21 juill. 2022 à 17 h 5
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 170
Mentions "j'aime": 35
Quoting: Masonh618
Not worth moving Lindgren to give the 3C a 6x4. Just put Goodrow there next season


Quoting: Shakabakes
Chytil's fate was sealed the second they signed Trocheck. He's out. They'll find a cheaper 3C option or just plug Goodrow in.


Probably gonna have to move Lindgren either way, unless they can find a 3C for 1mil. Goodrow is a meh 3rd C and if Trocheck or Zibanejad go down long term we're screwed. Can't contend with Panarin-Goodrow-Kakko as the 2nd line.
21 juill. 2022 à 20 h 12
#6
MGITBPITNHL
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,495
Mentions "j'aime": 1,530
Quoting: SomethingKindaGeneric
Probably gonna have to move Lindgren either way, unless they can find a 3C for 1mil. Goodrow is a meh 3rd C and if Trocheck or Zibanejad go down long term we're screwed. Can't contend with Panarin-Goodrow-Kakko as the 2nd line.


I wouldn’t panic about that. Goodrow played a lot of first line RW this past season and was fine
21 juill. 2022 à 20 h 22
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 170
Mentions "j'aime": 35
Quoting: Masonh618
I wouldn’t panic about that. Goodrow played a lot of first line RW this past season and was fine


not winning a cup with fine

look at the depth of the teams that have won a cup lately. they're not putting overpaid grinders in their top 6. not gonna have the cap space to add like we did last year either.

say zibanejad gets another concussion. you're going Trocheck-Goodrow-Brodzinski-Carpenter down the middle? you think that's beating tampa/carolina etc in 7 games? you gotta have contingency plans and our center depth is totally drained. maybe you can move a young D for a young C (Kings might be interested), but if you're going into the season with Goodrow as ur 3rd best center (and no other top 9 center options) you're just wasting our marquee wingers.
21 juill. 2022 à 22 h 54
#8
MGITBPITNHL
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,495
Mentions "j'aime": 1,530
Quoting: SomethingKindaGeneric
not winning a cup with fine

look at the depth of the teams that have won a cup lately. they're not putting overpaid grinders in their top 6. not gonna have the cap space to add like we did last year either.

say zibanejad gets another concussion. you're going Trocheck-Goodrow-Brodzinski-Carpenter down the middle? you think that's beating tampa/carolina etc in 7 games? you gotta have contingency plans and our center depth is totally drained. maybe you can move a young D for a young C (Kings might be interested), but if you're going into the season with Goodrow as ur 3rd best center (and no other top 9 center options) you're just wasting our marquee wingers.


Well way to cherry pick an injury to the one forward who would kill the entire depth. Not to mention, you don’t even have a contingency plan either lol. Trocheck-Chytil-Brodzinski-Carpenter also isn’t beating Tampa/Carolina so why even bring this up?

If anything, maybe the best move is move Goodrow so that you can spend under $1.5M on a 4th liner. If you’re willing to stomach four years of $1.25M after 2027 dead cap you’ll get cap credit for 2023-25. But still, I don’t really understand your massive opposition. This is a cup contender, especially post trade deadline.
22 juill. 2022 à 11 h 11
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 9
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Quoting: Masonh618
Not worth moving Lindgren to give the 3C a 6x4. Just put Goodrow there next season


If Goodrow is our 3C we are in massive trouble, he's a mediocre at best 4th liner. He was not good when he jumped up in the lineup even to the third line. He was an anchor to Panarin and Strome, an anchor to Mika and Kreider and an anchor to Laf and Chytil. That contract needs to go, it was a bad idea from the moment they traded for his rights
22 juill. 2022 à 11 h 43
#10
MGITBPITNHL
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,495
Mentions "j'aime": 1,530
Quoting: LGR89
If Goodrow is our 3C we are in massive trouble, he's a mediocre at best 4th liner. He was not good when he jumped up in the lineup even to the third line. He was an anchor to Panarin and Strome, an anchor to Mika and Kreider and an anchor to Laf and Chytil. That contract needs to go, it was a bad idea from the moment they traded for his rights

A mediocre 3C is reasonable but a mediocre 4th liner??? Goodrow was arguably our most effective defensive forward outside of Zibanejad, and he improved his offense output from the numbers he accumulated with the freaking Lightning out of all teams.

C’mon man, you know none of what you said is true. You only said it because you hate the contract. (To be clear, it is bad)
26 juill. 2022 à 13 h 47
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 9
Mentions "j'aime": 1
Quoting: Masonh618
A mediocre 3C is reasonable but a mediocre 4th liner??? Goodrow was arguably our most effective defensive forward outside of Zibanejad, and he improved his offense output from the numbers he accumulated with the freaking Lightning out of all teams.

C’mon man, you know none of what you said is true. You only said it because you hate the contract. (To be clear, it is bad)


44.44% CF, 44.48% SF, 44.42% xGF%, all at 5v5... he was not good at all last year. He was far from our most effective defensive forward, he was one of the least effective. He improved his offensive numbers because he was getting play time with Panarin, his metrics were atrocious. He made that line significantly worse with him than without him, the contract is horrible but he wasn't much better as a player
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage