SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

What Happens Now

Créé par: LosPatos
Équipe: 2022-23 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 21 juill. 2022
Publié: 21 juill. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 000 000 $
21 770 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1950 000 $
1800 000 $
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Zucker, Jason
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (PIT)
PIT
    Future Considerations
    2.
    NYR
    1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (COL)
    3.
    ANA
    1. Nyquist, Gustav
    2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (CBJ)
    CBJ
      Future considerations
      Rachats de contrats
      Enfoui
      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
      2023
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de PIT
      Logo de CBJ
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de MIN
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      2024
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de BOS
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      2025
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      Logo de ANA
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2182 500 000 $61 527 917 $0 $4 200 000 $20 972 083 $
      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
      AG, C
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
      C, AG
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
      AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      2 037 500 $2 037 500 $
      AG
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
      AD, C
      UFA - 5
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      3 650 000 $3 650 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
      5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
      AG, AD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
      C, AG
      RFA - 3
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
      AD, AG
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      1 295 000 $1 295 000 $
      AG, AD
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
      C, AG
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
      2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 1
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      Logo de Rangers de New York
      3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
      DG
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
      DD
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
      G
      M-NTC
      UFA - 5
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
      DG/DD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
      DD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      950 000 $950 000 $
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      750 000 $750 000 $
      DG/DD
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      1 770 000 $1 770 000 $
      DG/DD
      RFA - 2
      Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
      Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
      1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
      AG, C
      UFA - 1

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner
      21 juill. 2022 à 15 h 50
      #1
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2019
      Messages: 1,704
      Mentions "j'aime": 888
      CBJ decline, we need Gavrikov unless we upgrade on him. If you want Nyquist instead of Zucker, we can talk.
      LosPatos, Ajp_18, Viqsi and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
      21 juill. 2022 à 15 h 51
      #2
      Dolzhenkov Is Coming
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2022
      Messages: 3,571
      Mentions "j'aime": 5,125
      Papa Russian Gavy is too important to the care and livelihood of his Russian children in Columbus. You can't have him.
      LosPatos, Ajp_18, Viqsi and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
      21 juill. 2022 à 15 h 53
      #3
      Démarrer sujet
      LosPatos
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: déc. 2019
      Messages: 3,315
      Mentions "j'aime": 1,823
      Quoting: dk325
      Papa Russian Gavy is too important to the care and livelihood of his Russian children in Columbus. You can't have him.


      Quoting: benjgc
      CBJ decline, we need Gavrikov unless we upgrade on him. If you want Nyquist instead of Zucker, we can talk.



      Good to know haha. Didn’t realize Gavrikov had such an important role with CBJ. Thanks for the insight
      OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
      21 juill. 2022 à 16 h 3
      #4
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2022
      Messages: 50
      Mentions "j'aime": 25
      I think CBJ says no but if it were me id ship him off for the bruins second and Min 3rd. I feel like people overlook how much of a liability he was last season for us. A lot of jackets fans (including myself at times) blamed our defensive woes on a young defensive core but Gavrikov had a pretty bad season and I think people are overlooking that because hes a fan favorite and seems to be a tremendous locker room guy.
      21 juill. 2022 à 16 h 13
      #5
      Dolzhenkov Is Coming
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mars 2022
      Messages: 3,571
      Mentions "j'aime": 5,125
      Quoting: Lstroupe
      I think CBJ says no but if it were me id ship him off for the bruins second and Min 3rd. I feel like people overlook how much of a liability he was last season for us. A lot of jackets fans (including myself at times) blamed our defensive woes on a young defensive core but Gavrikov had a pretty bad season and I think people are overlooking that because hes a fan favorite and seems to be a tremendous locker room guy.


      You're very far off if you think Gavy was a liability. His stats show that he still managed to record an above average defensive WAR rating while being paired with some of the worst defensive players in the league statistically. Gavy also became one of the best 5v5 offensive WAR defensemen in the league last year. He's worth a hell of a lot more than a 2nd and 3rd, especially to the Jackets.
      Viqsi et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
      21 juill. 2022 à 16 h 14
      #6
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2015
      Messages: 42
      Mentions "j'aime": 9
      I doubt Ron Hextall does, but the Pittsburgh Penguins fanbase says yes.
      OldNYIfan et LosPatos a aimé ceci.
      21 juill. 2022 à 16 h 34
      #7
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2022
      Messages: 50
      Mentions "j'aime": 25
      Quoting: dk325
      You're very far off if you think Gavy was a liability. His stats show that he still managed to record an above average defensive WAR rating while being paired with some of the worst defensive players in the league statistically. Gavy also became one of the best 5v5 offensive WAR defensemen in the league last year. He's worth a hell of a lot more than a 2nd and 3rd, especially to the Jackets.


      Personally i dont pay attention to WAR ratings. There are a lot of things WAR ratings dont take into account. I just dont think Gavrikov has the hockey IQ to be a top 4 defenseman. I see WAR as a glorified +/- stat
      21 juill. 2022 à 17 h 6
      #8
      Once a Kings Fan Too
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2018
      Messages: 39,665
      Mentions "j'aime": 24,580
      I like all of your moves, but it's time to start accumulating 2024 second-rounders.
      LosPatos a aimé ceci.
       
      Répondre
      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
      Question:
      Options:
      Ajouter une option
      Soumettre le sondage