SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

What even is this team

Créé par: glarson17
Équipe: 2022-23 Sharks de San Jose
Date de création initiale: 13 juill. 2022
Publié: 13 juill. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Like, what? These moves are rough. I don’t mind the players they signed so much as the aav. What was the point of moving on from Burns if you just give that money to Nico Sturm and Michael Benning? And why give Sturm 3 years and Benning 4? That’s just bad. They trading away/bought out/failed to qualify close to 100 points in 3 players. They brought in half of that.

They could have got Colin Miller for $2 mil per, couldn’t sign Vatrano or Marchment.

I don’t see them signing Strome although I would like them to add some sort of shred of offense.

If Grier fails to move one of the three goaltenders, that would be a massive loss. A colossally horrendous week for San Jose.

To be fair, I’ve been in on the rebuild and changing the roster. The wrong pieces are just being moved. Move on from DW jr who had some of the best drafts in a long time and decided to keep Tim Burke who has been around since the beginning of time. Adding just grit and size to the roster and moving back in time in hockey isn’t going to help this organization. The nhl is evolving to being faster and more skilled and San Jose seems to be going backwards. It is early in griers tenure, and I’ve been cautiously optimistic, but this is looking rough thus far.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 200 000 $
22 250 000 $
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
22 775 000 $
33 000 000 $
11 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
41 250 000 $
11 500 000 $
Transactions
SJS
  1. Puljujärvi, Jesse [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
Sharks have to add some “talent” at some point, no?
EDM
  1. Reimer, James
Détails additionnels:
Solid 1B for Edmonton on a lower deal
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de CAR
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de CBJ
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de COL
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
2025
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
Logo de SJS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $74 206 668 $0 $300 000 $8 293 332 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
894 167 $894 167 $
AG
RFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
916 667 $916 667 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 025 000 $1 025 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 775 000 $2 775 000 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 175 000 $2 175 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
DG/DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
13 juill. 2022 à 23 h 41
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 2,921
Mentions "j'aime": 1,491
Edmonton won't be trading for a goalie until something falters as Skinner lost his exemption so will be the backup/1B to start the season.
13 juill. 2022 à 23 h 47
#2
MisstheWhalers
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 23,625
Mentions "j'aime": 12,352
The Burns trade doesn't look very good imo, pretty sure that's the biggest retention in history that's longer than one season.
Unless that prospect is something special you got a 3rd for that cap space which hardly seems like enough.

I really didn't think the trading back in the draft was a good move either.

I liked Grier as a player but so far as a GM his moves look questionable at best.
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
13 juill. 2022 à 23 h 53
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2019
Messages: 405
Mentions "j'aime": 69
That trade scenario has passed but Edmonton could use Gadjovich.
14 juill. 2022 à 0 h 41
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 5,214
Mentions "j'aime": 2,867
Couldn’t agree more. I’m not sure there’s a single move which I would call a genuine W.

Sharks are replacing good prospects and/or already good players for rando depth players who are getting ridiculous term and AAV. Lindblom is the only one I was remotely ok with but at the end of they day, they basically swapped Balcers for a more expensive version of himself.

And this fu6king dummy is forcing all our young players out of the lineup with these signings.

Totally baffling stuff.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage